Grammar 101: insider tips and tricks to instantly improve your writing (part 1)

Hannah Lawrence
Hannah Lawrence
woman uses highlighter on book
Reading time: 4 minutes

I've always been fascinated by language and writing: as a child, I wrote newsletters for my classmates and books about my imaginary friends' adventures. That love of words eventually led me into a career as a writer, editor and proofreader. Over my career, I've checked thousands of reports, articles and blogs – and I see the same grammatical mistakes time and time again.

In this blog series, I'll share my favourite tips and tricks to help you remember those tricky grammar rules; whether you're writing for work, to learn or just for fun, these posts will help you improve your English and write with more confidence. Here are the top three grammar rules that people ask me to explain:

1) "Which" or "that"?

2) "Less" or "fewer"? 

3) "Me" or "I"?

Grammar 101
Play
Privacy and cookies

By watching, you agree Pearson can share your viewership data for marketing and analytics for one year, revocable by deleting your cookies.

"Which" or "that"?

We use "that" to introduce a phrase that is essential for fully understanding a sentence. For example, if a colleague asks you to "Join me in the meeting room that has a red door", then this tells us that there is more than one meeting room, but only one has a red door. Without this piece of information, you won't know where to meet your colleague. Phrases like this that hold essential information are called "restrictive clauses".

In comparison, “which” introduces additional information that isn’t essential for understanding the sentence’s meaning. At a different office, if your colleague asks you to "Join me in the meeting room, which has a red door", then this tells us that there is only one meeting room and it happens to have a red door. You don't need to know the colour of the door to understand where to meet. These are called "non-restrictive clauses" and are separated with commas, unlike restrictive clauses.

Also compare: 
"Simon brought his dog that has three legs." (This tells us that Simon has more than one dog and only one of those dogs has three legs.)

"Jada brought her dog, which has three legs." (This tells us that Jada only has one dog. The dog also happens to have three legs.)

"Less" or "fewer"?

"Fewer" is for items that you can count: it means "not as many". 

"Less" is for mass concepts: it means "not as much". 

For example: "I'm trying to have less sugar in my diet. As part of this, I'm going to have fewer spoons of sugar in my coffee."

Another example: "I had less time to work this week, so I did fewer hours on the assignment."

"Time" is uncountable but "hours" are countable. 

"Me" or "I"?

Should you say “Jane, Carlos and I went to the movies?” or “Jane, Carlos and me went to the movies?”

Use "I" when you're doing something – when you are the "subject" of the sentence.

Use "me" when something is being done to you – when you are the "object" of the sentence. 

So, "I" is correct here. Here's the easiest way to know which one to use: remove the other people from the sentence and see if it still makes sense.

Incorrect: “Me went to the movies.”

Correct: “I went to the movies.”

Therefore, it's correct to say: “Jane, Carlos and I went to the movies.” 

That's when you're the subject of the sentence, now compare it to a case when you're the object. 

Incorrect: "Jane invited I to the movies." 

Correct: "Jane invited me to the movies."

Bonus tip: remember to always put other people first. So, in our first example, it is always "Jane, Carlos and I", rather than "I, Jane and Carlos". 

Grammar can be tricky, but it gets easier with practice – and a few insider secrets. Look out for the next post in this series, where we’ll explore more common grammar mistakes and how to avoid them.

More blogs from Pearson

  • A teacher looking at a laptop with two female students
    Why learn and love grammar in the digital age?
    By Jennifer Recio Lebedev
    Reading time: 5 minutes

    Back in 2023, I gave my first piano recital. Despite having played since childhood, I had limited performance experience. A string of negative self-talk held me back in the past:

    •  I’m bad at performing.
    • I can’t play for other people.

    But then I did it. I sat down at the baby grand, alone on the stage with my teacher in the wings, watching. My performance was not perfect, but I got through it…and my music was met with applause and positive comments afterwards. I have continued to perform each year and although I still get nervous, I know I am improving. The difference is that I am talking and thinking differently about myself and my music. This allows me to perform better.

    Does this make you wonder how much more some English language students could achieve if they let go of their anxiety, dislike and other limiting beliefs about studying and using grammar?

  • A teachr pointing at a workbook on a table inbetween two students
    Common mistakes teachers make and how to avoid them
    By Charlotte Guest
    Reading time: 5 minutes

    Teaching is a profession built on reflection. Even the most experienced educators occasionally look back at a lesson and think, “I could have done that better.” The truth is that mistakes are not a sign of failure; they are a powerful source of professional growth.

    There are many common mistakes teachers make. When newer language teachers recognize them early on, it can prevent ineffective habits from becoming routine. Whereas when experienced educators revisit these common mistakes, it can reveal subtle patterns that affect student engagement and learning. See if you recognize any of these common mistakes – and then learn techniques and strategies to avoid them.

    Why recognizing teaching mistakes accelerates professional growth

    The best teachers treat mistakes as diagnostic tools. Instead of asking “Did this lesson work?” they ask more useful questions:

    • What evidence shows that students understood the concept?
    • Who participated and who stayed silent?
    • Which activities generated genuine communication?

    This reflective approach is the foundation of professional development for teachers. When teachers regularly evaluate their methods, they move from simply delivering lessons to practicing responsive teaching, adapting instruction based on student needs in real time.

    In other words, the goal isn’t perfection. It’s continuous improvement.

  • A woman sat at a table contemplating
    How can I learn to think in a new language?
    By Charlotte Guest
    Reading time: 4 minutes

    If you are learning a language, you may understand many words but still translate everything in your head. Thinking in a new language means you understand and form ideas directly in that language, without relying on your first language. Most learners move from “understanding nothing” to “understanding more than they speak”, then progressing to simple conversations, and finally thinking naturally in the language. This shift takes practice, but it is possible for every learner – especially if you follow these tips. 

    Build a strong base with core vocabulary and grammar

    When learning a language, you do not need thousands of words at the start. You need the right words.

    Focus on 300–500 high-frequency words – the most common words in a language – and basic grammar. These are words that appear in most daily conversations and texts, and learning them helps you speak and understand basic sentences quickly. With these core words, you can:

    • Talk about your daily life
    • Ask simple questions
    • Share opinions
    • Describe past and future plans

    Short daily lessons (even 15 minutes) are very effective. Combine vocabulary, grammar, listening and speaking in a clear order. A strong base makes it much easier to start thinking in the language.