Assessing listening skills with the GSE

Leonor Corradi
Leonor Corradi
A teacher standing next to a student who is sat down, he has a pen and is gesturing to her work on the table.
Reading time: 4 minutes

In today’s interconnected world, effective communication in English is more crucial than ever. As educators and language learners seek to measure and improve English proficiency, a resource like the Global Scale of English (GSE) offers a valuable framework for assessment. This blog post will explore how the GSE can be used to assess listening skills, providing insights into how it also helps tailor instruction and support language development.

For listening skills, the GSE focuses on how well learners can understand spoken English in different contexts. It assesses comprehension at varying levels of complexity:

Understanding simple information: At lower levels, learners are expected to understand basic information, such as simple instructions or everyday topics. The GSE provides learning objectives for how well learners can grasp essential details.

Understanding main ideas: As proficiency grows, learners should be able to identify main ideas and key points in more complex spoken texts, such as conversations and broadcasts. The GSE outlines how well learners can extract important information from various sources.

Understanding detailed information: At advanced levels, learners are expected to comprehend detailed and nuanced information, including implicit meaning and speaker intent. The GSE describes the level of detail and depth of understanding required at these stages.

The GSE also shows how students engage in different operations of listening, from global comprehension, recognizing information and identifying specific information to extracting information. By taking this into account, teachers can monitor students’ progress and assess their listening skills. An example will show this in action.

Let’s consider a level, say GSE 30-35 (equivalent to low A2 on the CEFR) and focus on how students process information. When checking a listening activity, rather than simply focusing on whether the answers are correct or incorrect, we can analyze our learners using the GSE and see what progress they are making and what we need to do as teachers to help them move on. Heres how:

Learning objectives

GSE

Date 1

Date 2

Date 3

Date 4

Can understand basic information about someone when introduced to them using simple language.

28

 

 

 

 

Can recognize phrases and content words related to basic personal and family information.

30

 

 

 

 

Can identify simple information in a short video, provided that the visual supports this information and the delivery is slow and clear.

30

 

 

 

 

Can extract key factual information - prices, times and dates - from short clear, simple announcements.

30

 

 

 

 

Can identify basic factual information in short, simple dialogues or narratives on familiar everyday topics, if spoken slowly and clearly.

32

 

 

 

 

Can understand key information about arrangements in simple dialogues spoken slowly and clearly.

32

 

 

 

 

Can understand information related to people's daily routines.

32

 

 

 

 

Can understand the main information in short, simple dialogues about familiar activities, if spoken slowly and clearly.

33

 

 

 

 

Can identify key information from short audio recordings, if spoken slowly and clearly.

33

 

 

 

 

Can understand the main information in simple conversations about hobbies and interests.

34

 

 

 

 

Can extract key factual information such as prices, times and dates from a recorded phone message.

35

 

 

 

 

Can recognize some fixed expressions used to confirm information.

35

 

 

 

 

Can identify specific information in short, simple dialogues in which speakers make arrangements to do something, if spoken slowly and clearly.

35

 

 

 

 
We should analyze the items in the listening activity using the following criteria, criteria that we can find by analyzing the learning objectives
  • Should there be any support?
  • Are learners being asked to use a number of different listening modes?

Every class will include a range of different abilities: some students get all of the questions right, whereas others may not. In this case, the GSE provides teachers with an extremely valuable tool to assess learners’ performance.

We may see that students are performing well at the understanding and recognition level but still find it hard to identify and extract specific information. Will we solve this by simply giving them more listening activities? Well, no. To support them in identifying and extracting specific information, we need to help them understand and identify clues in a text. Analyzing the written audioscripts is the best way to help learners understand what they are listening to.

We can also use the same table, above, to record information each time we do a listening activity.

Students write the date and compare results to the ones they fill out in the future. This way, they can truly see progress and if they’ve mastered a particular learning objective, something hard for them to see, even if we tell them so.

Utilizing the GSE

The Global Scale of English provides a structured and detailed approach to assessing speaking and listening skills. By using the GSE framework, teachers can offer precise, level-appropriate feedback and tailor their instruction to meet learners' needs. This not only enhances the learning experience but also ensures that learners effectively develop their English communication skills. Whether you're a teacher or a learner, embracing the GSE can lead to more targeted, effective, and meaningful language assessment.

Explore the teaching resources available at GSE to support learning, including tools like our GSE Toolkit. 

Read our other post 'How the GSE can help teachers personalize activities'.

Learn more about the GSE

More blogs from Pearson

  • A woman sat at a table contemplating
    How can I learn to think in a new language?
    提交者 Charlotte Guest
    Reading time: 4 minutes

    If you are learning a language, you may understand many words but still translate everything in your head. Thinking in a new language means you understand and form ideas directly in that language, without relying on your first language. Most learners move from “understanding nothing” to “understanding more than they speak”, then progressing to simple conversations, and finally thinking naturally in the language. This shift takes practice, but it is possible for every learner – especially if you follow these tips. 

    Build a strong base with core vocabulary and grammar

    When learning a language, you do not need thousands of words at the start. You need the right words.

    Focus on 300–500 high-frequency words – the most common words in a language – and basic grammar. These are words that appear in most daily conversations and texts, and learning them helps you speak and understand basic sentences quickly. With these core words, you can:

    • Talk about your daily life
    • Ask simple questions
    • Share opinions
    • Describe past and future plans

    Short daily lessons (even 15 minutes) are very effective. Combine vocabulary, grammar, listening and speaking in a clear order. A strong base makes it much easier to start thinking in the language.

  • Teacher and students discussing over a laptop
    Gamification techniques that boost student participation
    提交者 Charlotte Guest
    Reading time: 6 minutes

    Why do students willingly spend hours trying to beat a game level, but struggle to spend ten minutes revising vocabulary? The difference is design. Gamification in education takes the design principles that make games so compelling – clear goals, visible progress, achievable challenges and immediate feedback – and applies them to everyday learning tasks. 

    Why gamification works in education

    Game-design elements – such as points, badges, leaderboards, levels, progress indicators, instant feedback and choice – increase participation and motivation. When students can see their progress, earn recognition and understand exactly what they’re working toward, tasks feel purposeful and effort feels rewarded. When carefully integrated into a learning management system (LMS), gamification turns every action, whether it’s a quiz, discussion or assignment, into an opportunity for quick feedback and visible progress.

    74% of teachers now use digital game-based learning tools, and the worldwide market is expanding at approximately 28% annually through 2030. This highlights how important it is to have platforms that include badges, leaderboards, adaptive tests and analytics to help students and teachers.

    Points and rewards systems

    Points and rewards are quantifiable tokens granted for desired behaviours (for example, submitting work, collaborating, mastering skills). They give instant, visible credit that reinforces habits and makes effort trackable across activities. When paired with choice and feedback, they sustain engagement without replacing intrinsic interest.

    In the classroom, students can earn points for things like attending regularly, submitting work on time, taking part in small quizzes or posting in forums. This gives quick feedback to show student effort and participation. Studies show that gamification can boost motivation to learn by up to 83%. However, it’s important to balance external rewards with chances for choice and reflection, because too much focus on rewards can reduce the natural desire to learn over time.

  • Woman uses AI on computer
    Why grammar still matters in a world of AI
    提交者 Hannah Lawrence
    Reading time: 7 minutes

    Given that AI can already write emails for us, generate reports and meeting summaries, do we really still need grammar skills? Surely we can just sit back, relax and leave our writing tasks to the machines?

    Don’t be fooled. AI is certainly revolutionizing our productivity and our work processes, but human oversight of AI is still essential – and grammar is fundamental to that oversight. In the same way that calculators didn’t eliminate the need for numeracy and spellcheck didn’t eliminate the need for spelling knowledge, AI doesn’t eliminate the need for language awareness.