How to assess your learners using the GSE Assessment Frameworks

Billie Jago
Billie Jago
A teachet stood in front of a class in front of a board, smiling at his students.
Reading time: 4 minutes

With language learning, assessing both the quality and the quantity of language use is crucial for accurate proficiency evaluation. While evaluating quantity (for example the number of words written or the duration of spoken production) can provide insights into a learner's fluency and engagement in a task, it doesn’t show a full picture of a learner’s language competence. For this, they would also need to be evaluated on the quality of what they produce (such as the appropriateness, accuracy and complexity of language use). The quality also considers factors such as grammatical accuracy, lexical choice, coherence and the ability to convey meaning effectively.

In order to measure the quality of different language skills, you can use the Global Scale of English (GSE) assessment frameworks.

Developed in collaboration with assessment experts, the GSE Assessment Frameworks are intended to be used alongside the GSE Learning Objectives to help you assess the proficiency of your learners.

There are two GSE Assessment Frameworks: one for adults and one for young learners.

What are the GSE Assessment Frameworks?

  • The GSE Assessment Frameworks are intended to be used alongside the GSE Learning Objectives to help teachers assess their learners’ proficiency of all four skills (speaking, listening, reading and writing).
  • The GSE Learning Objectives focus on the things a learner can do, while the GSE Assessment Frameworks focus on how well a learner can do these things.
  • It can help provide you with examples of what proficiencies your learners should be demonstrating.  
  • It can help teachers pinpoint students' specific areas of strength and weakness more accurately, facilitating targeted instruction and personalized learning plans.
  • It can also help to motivate your learners, as their progress is evidenced and they can see a clear path for improvement.

An example of the GSE Assessment Frameworks

This example is from the Adult Assessment Framework for speaking.

As you can see, there are sub-skills within speaking (and for the other three main overarching skills – writing, listening and reading). Within speaking, these are production and fluency, spoken interaction, language range and accuracy.

The GSE range (and corresponding CEFR level) is shown at the top of each column, and there are descriptors that students should ideally demonstrate at that level.

However, it is important to note that students may sit across different ranges, depending on the sub-skill. For example, your student may show evidence of GSE 43-50 production and fluency and spoken interaction, but they may need to improve their language range and accuracy, and therefore sit in a range of GSE 36-42 for these sub-skills.

The GSE assessment frameworks in practice – let’s try

So, how can you use these frameworks as a teacher in your lesson? Let’s look at an example.

Imagine you are teaching a class of adult learners at GSE 43-50 (B1). This week, your class has been working towards writing an essay about living in the city vs the countryside. Your class has just written their final essay and you want to assess what they have produced.

Look at the writing sub-skills in the GSE Assessment Framework for adults. Imagine these are the criteria you are using to assess your students’ writing.

You read one of your student's essays, and in their essay they demonstrate that they can:

  • Express their opinion on the advantages and disadvantages of living in the city vs the countryside
  • Make relevant points which are mostly on-topic
  • Use topic-related language
  • Connect their ideas logically and in a way that flows well
  • Write in clear paragraphs

However, you notice that:

  • They tend to repeat common words, such as city, town, countryside, nice, busy
  • They don’t use punctuation effectively, for example missing commas, long sentences, missing capitalization
  • They have some issues with grammatical structures

Compare the above notes to the GSE Assessment Frameworks. What level is your learner demonstrating in each sub-skill? How could you evidence this using the criteria?

Now, compare your answers to the ideas below.

The points marked in the GSE 43-50 column are evidence that the student is at the expected writing level for their class, based on what you observed in their essay. The points marked in the GSE 36-42 column could be shown to the student to tell them what they need to focus on to improve, based on their essay.

Customizing the GSE assessment frameworks

The GSE Assessment Frameworks are flexible and customizable, and you can use the descriptors for your specific purpose. You can choose the appropriate GSE Assessment Frameworks for your context, and build your own formative assessment based on these.

In the example above, you were only assessing an essay, so you could ignore any contexts that were not applicable to that scenario. For example, writes personal and semi-formal letters and emails relating to everyday matters, or incorporates some relevant details from external sources.

Another benefit of the frameworks is that you can personalize assessments and create tailored learning roadmaps for individual students. Of course, not all learners are the same, so the descriptors allow students to see which sub-skill they need to work on in order to bring their writing (or speaking, listening or reading) up to their expected level. It also helps you as the teacher to understand what sub-skills to focus on in lessons to improve these main skills.

Finally, don’t be afraid to introduce your students to these descriptors or translate them into the learner's first language for lower levels. It is a great way for them to pinpoint and reflect on their strengths and areas for improvement, rather than simply getting a score and not understanding how to get to the next level of confidence and ability.

By incorporating the GSE Assessment Frameworks into your course for formative assessment, you can build students’ confidence and help them better reflect on their learning.

Learn more about the GSE

More blogs from Pearson

  • People studying in a classroom with one holding her hand up
    How to teach business English to beginner learners
    提交者 Margaret O'Keeffe
    Reading time: 4 minutes

    Teaching business English to beginners can feel challenging, especially when learners have limited vocabulary and confidence. However, with the right structure and focus, you can help students build practical workplace communication skills step by step.

    Focus on high-frequency workplace vocabulary

    For beginners learners, communication matters more than complexity. Teaching commonly-used workplace vocabulary allows students to express basic ideas quickly and clearly.

    Focus on:

    • Everyday work routines (emails, meetings, schedules)
    • Common verb–noun combinations (for example, “make a call,” “solve a problem”)
    • Simple functional phrases for greetings and offers

    This focus on high-frequency language helps learners retain and reuse it more easily.

    Introduce vocabulary in manageable, meaningful ways

    Vocabulary learning becomes more effective when it is limited and contextualized. Instead of overwhelming students, introduce a small number of new words per lesson and place them in realistic scenarios.

    For example:

    • Phone conversations
    • Short emails or messages
    • Daily task lists

    Memory improves when learners interact with words actively. Matching exercises, sentence-building and personalization tasks all strengthen recall because they require learners to process meaning rather than just memorize.

  • Two young girls fistbumping eachother in celebration
    Debunking myths about neurodivergence and language learning
    提交者 Charlotte Guest
    Reading time: 5 minutes

    Can neurodivergent learners really learn a new language?

    Neurodivergent people can learn new languages successfully. Often, what seems like an inability is actually due to a mismatch between traditional teaching methods and how different brains process information.

    Research across ADHD, autism and dyslexia consistently shows that language learning is not only possible but can offer cognitive, social and even emotional benefits. The key variable isn’t capacity, it’s approach.

    Common myths about ADHD, autism and dyslexia in language learning

    Myth 1: “People with ADHD can’t focus enough to learn a language”

    Fact: ADHD brains often thrive with novelty, variety and stimulation,  all of which language learning naturally provides.

    While research on ADHD and language learning is still emerging, scholars highlight that the field is under-researched, not evidence of inability. This gap reinforces that perceived difficulties are often due to teaching methods rather than learner capacity. Traditional methods (long grammar drills, passive memorization) can fail ADHD learners. But when learning includes:

    • Short, varied activities
    • Speaking and interaction
    • Gamified tools
    • Real-world usage

    Attention often improves, not worsens.

    Reframe: It’s not a focus deficit, it’s a method mismatch.

    Myth 2: “Dyslexia makes learning another language too difficult”

    Fact: Dyslexia affects reading and decoding,  not intelligence or the ability to acquire language.

    In fact, many dyslexic learners:

    • Excel in spoken language skills
    • Develop strong pattern recognition
    • Benefit from multisensory input (audio + visual + movement)

    Difficulties usually arise when teaching is overly text-heavy.

    Reframe: Dyslexia changes how language is learned, not whether it can be learned.

    Myth 3: “Autistic learners shouldn’t be pushed into bilingualism”

    Fact: There is no evidence that learning multiple languages harms autistic individuals. Reviews have shown that bilingualism does not have negative effects on autistic children, despite long-standing misconceptions among professionals. In many cases, it can:

    • Support communication flexibility
    • Enhance social connection (especially in multilingual families)
    • Strengthen cognitive processing

    The outdated belief that bilingualism causes confusion has been widely debunked. More recent reviews also highlight cognitive, social and identity-related benefits of bilingualism in autism, challenging deficit-based assumptions. 

    Reframe: Language learning can expand communication,  not limit it.

    Myth 4: “Neurodivergent learners just need more discipline”

    Fact: What looks like “lack of effort” is often cognitive overload.

    Neurodivergent learners may struggle when:

    • Instructions are unclear
    • Tasks rely on one learning modality
    • Pacing is rigid
    • Working memory is overloaded

    Educational research shows that students are very different from each other, and teaching should change to fit those differences.

    Reframe: The issue isn’t motivation,  it’s accessibility.

    Why traditional teaching methods don’t work for every brain

    Most language classrooms still rely on:

    • Heavy text-based instruction
    • One-size-fits-all pacing
    • Passive memorization
    • Limited sensory engagement

    These approaches conflict with what we know about different ways of learning (learner modalities),  the idea that people process information differently (visual, auditory, kinesthetic, etc.).

    The modality principle of multimedia learning shows that people learn better when information is presented through multiple channels (e.g., visuals + audio instead of text alone). This is especially important for neurodivergent learners.

    Bottom line: When teaching adapts to the learner, outcomes improve dramatically.

    How educators and parents can support diverse learners

    Start with this principle: the learner is not the problem; the system might be.

    For educators:

    • Offer multiple ways to engage with content
    • Design activities that include speaking, listening, and movement
    • Avoid equating speed with ability
    • Normalize different learning paths

    For parents:

    • Focus on encouragement, not pressure
    • Choose programs that emphasize communication, not rote memorization
    • Advocate for inclusive teaching approaches in schools
  • A woman holding papers walking through a campus smiling
    Waiting for English test results? Get your scores faster
    提交者 Abi Fordham
    Reading time: 3 minutes

    Let’s be honest. One of the hardest parts of taking an English test isn’t the test itself; it’s what happens afterward. That strange limbo where the test is over, but your future still feels on hold. You’re waiting, refreshing your inbox, thinking about every question you answered, and wondering how long it’ll be until you can finally move on with your plans. If that sounds like you, just remember: it’s totally normal. Completely normal.

    Why waiting feels so intense (and why it’s not “impatience”)

    The moment you finish a test, your brain jumps ahead to everything that depends on that score:

    • Can I apply this week?
    • Will I meet the deadline?
    • Do I need to prepare a backup option?
    • When can I tell my family?

    It’s not just curiosity. It’s the need for certainty so you can take the next step. Because studying in the USA involves so many moving parts – applications, forms, accommodation, visa timelines – and every one of them depends on knowing your score.

    Fast results aren’t just a nice bonus; they directly impact how smoothly your study plan goes.