How to assess your learners using the GSE Assessment Frameworks

Billie Jago
Billie Jago
A teachet stood in front of a class in front of a board, smiling at his students.
Reading time: 4 minutes

With language learning, assessing both the quality and the quantity of language use is crucial for accurate proficiency evaluation. While evaluating quantity (for example the number of words written or the duration of spoken production) can provide insights into a learner's fluency and engagement in a task, it doesn’t show a full picture of a learner’s language competence. For this, they would also need to be evaluated on the quality of what they produce (such as the appropriateness, accuracy and complexity of language use). The quality also considers factors such as grammatical accuracy, lexical choice, coherence and the ability to convey meaning effectively.

In order to measure the quality of different language skills, you can use the Global Scale of English (GSE) assessment frameworks.

Developed in collaboration with assessment experts, the GSE Assessment Frameworks are intended to be used alongside the GSE Learning Objectives to help you assess the proficiency of your learners.

There are two GSE Assessment Frameworks: one for adults and one for young learners.

What are the GSE Assessment Frameworks?

  • The GSE Assessment Frameworks are intended to be used alongside the GSE Learning Objectives to help teachers assess their learners’ proficiency of all four skills (speaking, listening, reading and writing).
  • The GSE Learning Objectives focus on the things a learner can do, while the GSE Assessment Frameworks focus on how well a learner can do these things.
  • It can help provide you with examples of what proficiencies your learners should be demonstrating.  
  • It can help teachers pinpoint students' specific areas of strength and weakness more accurately, facilitating targeted instruction and personalized learning plans.
  • It can also help to motivate your learners, as their progress is evidenced and they can see a clear path for improvement.

An example of the GSE Assessment Frameworks

This example is from the Adult Assessment Framework for speaking.

As you can see, there are sub-skills within speaking (and for the other three main overarching skills – writing, listening and reading). Within speaking, these are production and fluency, spoken interaction, language range and accuracy.

The GSE range (and corresponding CEFR level) is shown at the top of each column, and there are descriptors that students should ideally demonstrate at that level.

However, it is important to note that students may sit across different ranges, depending on the sub-skill. For example, your student may show evidence of GSE 43-50 production and fluency and spoken interaction, but they may need to improve their language range and accuracy, and therefore sit in a range of GSE 36-42 for these sub-skills.

The GSE assessment frameworks in practice – let’s try

So, how can you use these frameworks as a teacher in your lesson? Let’s look at an example.

Imagine you are teaching a class of adult learners at GSE 43-50 (B1). This week, your class has been working towards writing an essay about living in the city vs the countryside. Your class has just written their final essay and you want to assess what they have produced.

Look at the writing sub-skills in the GSE Assessment Framework for adults. Imagine these are the criteria you are using to assess your students’ writing.

You read one of your student's essays, and in their essay they demonstrate that they can:

  • Express their opinion on the advantages and disadvantages of living in the city vs the countryside
  • Make relevant points which are mostly on-topic
  • Use topic-related language
  • Connect their ideas logically and in a way that flows well
  • Write in clear paragraphs

However, you notice that:

  • They tend to repeat common words, such as city, town, countryside, nice, busy
  • They don’t use punctuation effectively, for example missing commas, long sentences, missing capitalization
  • They have some issues with grammatical structures

Compare the above notes to the GSE Assessment Frameworks. What level is your learner demonstrating in each sub-skill? How could you evidence this using the criteria?

Now, compare your answers to the ideas below.

The points marked in the GSE 43-50 column are evidence that the student is at the expected writing level for their class, based on what you observed in their essay. The points marked in the GSE 36-42 column could be shown to the student to tell them what they need to focus on to improve, based on their essay.

Customizing the GSE assessment frameworks

The GSE Assessment Frameworks are flexible and customizable, and you can use the descriptors for your specific purpose. You can choose the appropriate GSE Assessment Frameworks for your context, and build your own formative assessment based on these.

In the example above, you were only assessing an essay, so you could ignore any contexts that were not applicable to that scenario. For example, writes personal and semi-formal letters and emails relating to everyday matters, or incorporates some relevant details from external sources.

Another benefit of the frameworks is that you can personalize assessments and create tailored learning roadmaps for individual students. Of course, not all learners are the same, so the descriptors allow students to see which sub-skill they need to work on in order to bring their writing (or speaking, listening or reading) up to their expected level. It also helps you as the teacher to understand what sub-skills to focus on in lessons to improve these main skills.

Finally, don’t be afraid to introduce your students to these descriptors or translate them into the learner's first language for lower levels. It is a great way for them to pinpoint and reflect on their strengths and areas for improvement, rather than simply getting a score and not understanding how to get to the next level of confidence and ability.

By incorporating the GSE Assessment Frameworks into your course for formative assessment, you can build students’ confidence and help them better reflect on their learning.

Learn more about the GSE

More blogs from Pearson

  • A woman reading a book outdoors smiling
    Fun Halloween activities for your class to practise English
    By Charlotte Guest
    Reading time: 4 minutes

    Halloween is a fun opportunity to bring something different into the classroom. It gives students a chance to learn new vocabulary, practise English and explore traditions and stories.

    Here are some simple Halloween classroom ideas for students of different ages and English levels.

    1. Learn Halloween vocabulary

    Start with some common Halloween words. You could introduce words such as pumpkin, costume, witch, ghost, spider, skeleton, haunted house, monster and bat.

    For younger students, use pictures, actions or simple definitions to help them understand the words.

    With older students, go beyond basic vocabulary. Ask them to find adjectives to describe a Halloween scene, such as mysterious, frightening, creepy, strange or unusual. They could then write short descriptions using the new words.

    2. Create a Halloween story

    Give students a few Halloween words and ask them to create a short story.

    For younger learners, give them five words such as ghost, pumpkin, forest, cat and door. They can create a simple story using the words.

    Older students can take this further. Give them a story opening, such as: “When I opened the door, I immediately knew something was wrong…”

    Ask them to continue the story. You could challenge them to include a twist at the end or tell the story from the point of view of a different character.

  • Students stood around a laptop together talking
    Are PTE Express scores hard to interpret?
    By Alice Bazzi
    Reading time: 2 minutes

    For admissions teams, managing a high volume of international applications, clarity and speed are critical. English language test scores play a central role in decision-making, but only if they are easy to interpret and apply.

    A common concern when introducing a new test is whether it will add complexity. Will teams need additional training? Will it slow down the admissions process? In reality, PTE Express has been designed specifically to simplify how scores are understood and used in admissions workflows.

    Each PTE Express score report provides a clear overall score, alongside individual skill breakdowns for speaking, writing, reading and listening. This structured approach ensures that the admissions teams can quickly assess both a candidate’s general proficiency and specific strengths and/or gaps without the need to decode a complex scoring system.

    Importantly, PTE Express aligns with recognized frameworks such as the Global Scale of English (GSE). This makes it straightforward for institutions to map scores to existing entry requirements and benchmark levels, supporting consistency across different applicant cohorts. The reports are delivered digitally through a secure platform, meaning scores can be accessed, verified and shared instantly.

    For admissions teams working with tight deadlines, this removes manual steps and reduces any administrative burdens associated with traditional paper-based or fragmented reporting systems.

    From a decision-making perspective, this clarity translates into efficiency. There is no need for extended interpretation or additional validation; the scores are presented in a way that is immediately usable and aligned to institutional needs. Agents also benefit from this level of transparency.

    Clear, easy-to-explain scoring helps them guide students more effectively, ensuring realistic expectations and stronger alignment between the student's ability and the institutional requirements. For government and regulatory bodies, consistent and interpretable scores support compliance, audit processes and large-scale decision-making.

    The bottom line

    PTE Express scores are built for the modern admissions environment. With clear, structured, recognized benchmarks and digital delivery, they provide fast, transparent and reliable insights that enable confident decisions at scale.

  • A woman walking through ferns in the woods
    10 creepy cryptids you should know about
    By Charlotte Guest
    Reading time: 4 minutes

    Cryptids are creatures that are often unseen and mysterious. They are shrouded in legends and stories that have been passed down for generations, making them a fascination for humans for centuries. If you're looking to add a little more creativity to your story writing, learning about these elusive beings can be a great way to do so. In today's post, we'll take a closer look at some examples of cryptids, to get your imagination racing.

    What are cryptids?

    Cryptids are mythical creatures or beings whose existence cannot be proven by science. Some may claim to have seen them but there's usually no solid proof of the encounter. They exist in folklore, mythology and urban legends. Cryptids can be found in cultures all around the world, from the Loch Ness Monster in Scotland to the Chupacabra in Latin America.

    Here are ten cryptids you'll want to learn about this Halloween season:

    Barghest

    The Barghest is a ghostly black dog cryptid that appears in the folklore of Yorkshire and Lancashire. It is often associated with misfortune, and sightings of this ominous creature continue to be reported.

    Owlman

    The Owlman is a humanoid creature with owl-like features such as red eyes, wings and feathers. Sightings of this mysterious creature have been reported around the village of Mawnan Smith in Cornwall, adding an eerie twist to local legend.

    The Kraken

    The Kraken is a legendary sea monster of gigantic size and octopus-like appearance, said to dwell in the deep sea and feasting on ships that are unfortunate enough to come across it.

    Water Leaper (Llamhigyn Y Dwr)

    The Water Leaper, also known as the Linton Worm or Lindworm, is a Welsh cryptid believed to inhabit bodies of water such as ponds and rivers. Descriptions vary, but it is often depicted as a fearsome water-dwelling creature.