Designed for learning, built for growth: How Big Ben Education Group reimagined short-term programs

Kathy Chan
Teacher talking to girl working on laptop in classroom smiling
Reading time: 3 minutes

The challenge: Creating meaningful learning in short-term programs

In recent years, Big Ben Education Group faced a challenge: how to deliver meaningful learning within short-term programs. Although teachers were passionate and students motivated, their short-term courses lacked a clear academic structure, making learning feel rushed and less impactful. At the same time, they relied heavily on a single market and sought to attract a more diverse, global student mix.

This raised a critical question: How do you design a short-term program that is both academically meaningful and appealing to a global student audience? That question led to the launch of their first Winter Camp in 2024.

The turning point: From camp to structured learning experience

The Winter Camp marked a major shift. For the first time, students from across China, Korea, Japan, Central Asia and the Middle East were brought together. Managing this level of cultural and linguistic diversity required more than enthusiasm; it required structure.

The school introduced Big English as a core academic framework, giving teachers clarity on learning objectives and ensuring consistency across levels, even within a condensed timeframe.

But the transformation didn’t stop in the classroom. Excursions were redesigned with clear learning goals, turning them into opportunities for real-world language application. This shift from activities to outcomes required careful planning and strong collaboration between academic and operations teams.  What emerged was something new – a structured, student-centered learning experience that balanced academic rigor with real-world engagement.

How do you make a short term course feel meaningful?
Play
Privacy and cookies

By watching, you agree Pearson can share your viewership data for marketing and analytics for one year, revocable by deleting your cookies.

The results: Building momentum and a more inclusive learning culture

The success of the Winter Camp created immediate momentum. It paved the way for a Summer Camp and inspired the introduction of additional programs, including:

  • Speaking-focused sessions
  • Reading clubs
  • Free Saturday classes

These initiatives were designed to support students with different learning speeds, time zones and cultural backgrounds, ensuring a more inclusive experience for all.

For students, the impact was clear. They weren’t just attending classes; they were part of a supportive, immersive learning community.

For teachers, it was equally rewarding, demonstrating how structured programs, when combined with flexibility, could significantly boost student confidence and engagement.

The biggest takeaway? When education is designed with both structure and empathy, growth becomes sustainable.

The tools behind their success

Pearson resources played an important role in enabling this transformation. Across programs, the school used course materials such as Big English, Speakout, Side by Side, English Code, and Wider World to provide a consistent academic foundation.

Digital tools like Pearson English Connect and Test Hub supported lesson planning, assessment and progress tracking, particularly valuable in intensive camp settings.

For placement and progression, assessments including Level Test, Benchmark Test and PTE helped ensure accurate tracking and allowed clear communication of progress with students and parents.

Together, these tools allowed the Big Ben Education Group to maintain academic clarity and structure, while keeping the overall experience dynamic, interactive and student-focused.

Scaling for the future

What began as a solution to a short-term challenge has evolved into a long-term strategy for growth.

By combining structured learning with inclusive design, Big Ben Education Group has not only strengthened its programs but also built a more diverse, resilient and future-ready learning community.

Read our blog posts 'GSE Partner School Program: Batari School and Maitreyawira School.' and 'Japan’s English education evolves with international standards: How CEFR-J and GSE support learning'.

Explore our courses and tests

Don't miss our other blogs.

  • Students sat at a table with microphones talking
    Building fluent, confident speakers: better ways to assess speaking
    By Charlotte Guest
    Reading time: 6 minutes

    Why traditional speaking assessments can make students feel stressed

    Traditional speaking tests often feel high-stakes and performative. Students are asked to respond on demand, usually in front of a teacher or peers, with little room for hesitation or self-correction. This setup can make it harder for students to show what they can really do because:

    • Time pressure shifts focus from communicating meaning to avoiding mistakes
    • Teacher-centered evaluation can feel judgmental rather than supportive
    • One-off testing may not capture a learner's true abilitiy, especially if they're nervous. 

    When people feel anxious, it often affects their fluency. They find it harder to think so they pause more, forget words and feel less confident. As a result, assessments may reflect how comfortable someone feels under pressure, rather than how effectively they can communicate.

    Key components of speaking fluency to evaluate

    Fluency isn't just about talking fast. It involves several clear signs.

  • People studying in a classroom with one holding her hand up
    How to teach business English to beginner learners
    By Margaret O'Keeffe
    Reading time: 4 minutes

    Teaching business English to beginners can feel challenging, especially when learners have limited vocabulary and confidence. However, with the right structure and focus, you can help students build practical workplace communication skills step by step.

    Focus on high-frequency workplace vocabulary

    For beginners learners, communication matters more than complexity. Teaching commonly-used workplace vocabulary allows students to express basic ideas quickly and clearly.

    Focus on:

    • Everyday work routines (emails, meetings, schedules)
    • Common verb–noun combinations (for example, “make a call,” “solve a problem”)
    • Simple functional phrases for greetings and offers

    This focus on high-frequency language helps learners retain and reuse it more easily.

    Introduce vocabulary in manageable, meaningful ways

    Vocabulary learning becomes more effective when it is limited and contextualized. Instead of overwhelming students, introduce a small number of new words per lesson and place them in realistic scenarios.

    For example:

    • Phone conversations
    • Short emails or messages
    • Daily task lists

    Memory improves when learners interact with words actively. Matching exercises, sentence-building and personalization tasks all strengthen recall because they require learners to process meaning rather than just memorize.

  • Two young girls fistbumping eachother in celebration
    Debunking myths about neurodivergence and language learning
    By Charlotte Guest
    Reading time: 5 minutes

    Can neurodivergent learners really learn a new language?

    Neurodivergent people can learn new languages successfully. Often, what seems like an inability is actually due to a mismatch between traditional teaching methods and how different brains process information.

    Research across ADHD, autism and dyslexia consistently shows that language learning is not only possible but can offer cognitive, social and even emotional benefits. The key variable isn’t capacity, it’s approach.

    Common myths about ADHD, autism and dyslexia in language learning

    Myth 1: “People with ADHD can’t focus enough to learn a language”

    Fact: ADHD brains often thrive with novelty, variety and stimulation,  all of which language learning naturally provides.

    While research on ADHD and language learning is still emerging, scholars highlight that the field is under-researched, not evidence of inability. This gap reinforces that perceived difficulties are often due to teaching methods rather than learner capacity. Traditional methods (long grammar drills, passive memorization) can fail ADHD learners. But when learning includes:

    • Short, varied activities
    • Speaking and interaction
    • Gamified tools
    • Real-world usage

    Attention often improves, not worsens.

    Reframe: It’s not a focus deficit, it’s a method mismatch.

    Myth 2: “Dyslexia makes learning another language too difficult”

    Fact: Dyslexia affects reading and decoding,  not intelligence or the ability to acquire language.

    In fact, many dyslexic learners:

    • Excel in spoken language skills
    • Develop strong pattern recognition
    • Benefit from multisensory input (audio + visual + movement)

    Difficulties usually arise when teaching is overly text-heavy.

    Reframe: Dyslexia changes how language is learned, not whether it can be learned.

    Myth 3: “Autistic learners shouldn’t be pushed into bilingualism”

    Fact: There is no evidence that learning multiple languages harms autistic individuals. Reviews have shown that bilingualism does not have negative effects on autistic children, despite long-standing misconceptions among professionals. In many cases, it can:

    • Support communication flexibility
    • Enhance social connection (especially in multilingual families)
    • Strengthen cognitive processing

    The outdated belief that bilingualism causes confusion has been widely debunked. More recent reviews also highlight cognitive, social and identity-related benefits of bilingualism in autism, challenging deficit-based assumptions. 

    Reframe: Language learning can expand communication,  not limit it.

    Myth 4: “Neurodivergent learners just need more discipline”

    Fact: What looks like “lack of effort” is often cognitive overload.

    Neurodivergent learners may struggle when:

    • Instructions are unclear
    • Tasks rely on one learning modality
    • Pacing is rigid
    • Working memory is overloaded

    Educational research shows that students are very different from each other, and teaching should change to fit those differences.

    Reframe: The issue isn’t motivation,  it’s accessibility.

    Why traditional teaching methods don’t work for every brain

    Most language classrooms still rely on:

    • Heavy text-based instruction
    • One-size-fits-all pacing
    • Passive memorization
    • Limited sensory engagement

    These approaches conflict with what we know about different ways of learning (learner modalities),  the idea that people process information differently (visual, auditory, kinesthetic, etc.).

    The modality principle of multimedia learning shows that people learn better when information is presented through multiple channels (e.g., visuals + audio instead of text alone). This is especially important for neurodivergent learners.

    Bottom line: When teaching adapts to the learner, outcomes improve dramatically.

    How educators and parents can support diverse learners

    Start with this principle: the learner is not the problem; the system might be.

    For educators:

    • Offer multiple ways to engage with content
    • Design activities that include speaking, listening, and movement
    • Avoid equating speed with ability
    • Normalize different learning paths

    For parents:

    • Focus on encouragement, not pressure
    • Choose programs that emphasize communication, not rote memorization
    • Advocate for inclusive teaching approaches in schools