Which argument best evaluates why coordination between federal programs and community-based organizations is essential to reduce residual food insecurity?

Coordination is unnecessary because federal programs have uniform reach and community organizations add only redundant bureaucracy, so coupling them achieves no additional benefit.

Coordination leverages federal funding and standardization with local knowledge, cultural tailoring, and distribution flexibility; together they can address both eligibility barriers and last-mile delivery challenges that each system alone cannot fully solve.

Community organizations should replace federal programs entirely because local groups have infinite capacity and no requirement for standardized reporting or accountability.

Coordination increases complexity and therefore always worsens access; the best approach is to lock all food assistance into a single federal agency without community input.