After an ANOVA rejects $H_0$, you plan to run Tukey pairwise comparisons manually. Which sequence of steps correctly describes the procedure you should report in your methods section?

If the software does not provide $p$-values for Tukey, report only the ANOVA $F$ statistic and conclude which pairs differ based on visual inspection of means without performing any standardized comparisons.

Use the ANOVA MSE to compute $p$-values directly for each pair by dividing the mean differences by MSE and looking up $F$-table values; skip any reference to the studentized range since$p$-values are always available.

Compute pairwise independent $t$-tests for all pairs at $\alpha =0.05$, then apply Tukey's $q$ to the smallest $t$-score only and report that value as the definitive pairwise conclusion.

Extract MSE from ANOVA (within-group variance), compute $df=N-k$ to find the appropriate $q$ critical value for the chosen alpha and $k$, calculate each (for equal $n$), compare each $q$ to $q_{crit}$, and report which pairs are significant along with their $q$ statistics.