Skip to main content
Back

Condorcet Voting Paradox definitions

Control buttons has been changed to "navigation" mode.
1/15
  • Condorcet Voting Paradox

    A situation where majority voting among three or more options leads to a cycle of winners, causing inconsistent outcomes.
  • Majority Voting

    A decision process where the option with the most votes wins, but can result in paradoxical or manipulated outcomes.
  • Preference Order

    The ranking of choices by individuals or groups, which determines their voting behavior in pairwise comparisons.
  • Non-Transitive Cycle

    A sequence where option A beats B, B beats C, but C beats A, violating logical consistency in voting results.
  • Voting Agenda

    The sequence in which options are paired and voted on, significantly affecting the final outcome.
  • Policy Manipulation

    The strategic arrangement of voting order to ensure a desired option wins, regardless of overall preferences.
  • Pairwise Comparison

    A method where two options are voted against each other, revealing group preferences and influencing results.
  • Group Preference

    The collective ranking of choices by a subgroup, which shapes their voting decisions in each round.
  • Elimination Process

    The removal of options through sequential votes, narrowing choices and impacting which policy prevails.
  • Policy Outcome

    The final decision or winning option resulting from the voting process, often shaped by agenda manipulation.
  • Transitive Property

    A logical principle where if A beats B and B beats C, then A should beat C, but fails in the paradox scenario.
  • Voting Sequence

    The order in which votes are conducted, which can be exploited to favor certain outcomes.
  • Inconsistent Results

    Outcomes where majority voting does not yield a clear winner, leading to cycles or contradictions.
  • Policyholder

    An individual or group with the power to set the voting agenda, potentially influencing the final decision.
  • Societal Outcome

    The result of collective voting, which may not reflect the true preferences of the majority due to manipulation.