BackChapter 16: Public Choices, Public Goods, and Healthcare – Microeconomics Study Notes
Study Guide - Smart Notes
Tailored notes based on your materials, expanded with key definitions, examples, and context.
Public Choices
Introduction to Public Choices
Public choices are decisions that have broad consequences for society, often made by political leaders or public servants. These choices impact the allocation of scarce resources and shape policies such as regulation, taxation, and government spending.
Definition: A public choice is a decision affecting many people or society as a whole.
Examples: Tax policy, government spending, price regulation, and international trade decisions.
Importance: Large quantities of resources are allocated through public choices.
Why Governments Exist
Governments play a crucial role in the economy for three main reasons:
Establish and maintain property rights
Provide nonmarket mechanisms for allocating scarce resources
Implement arrangements that redistribute income and wealth
Government Failure
Replacing markets with government allocation is complex and can lead to inefficiency, known as government failure.
Government failure: Occurs when government actions result in inefficiency, either through overprovision or underprovision of goods and services.
Political Marketplace
Public choices are made in a political marketplace involving four groups:
Voters
Firms
Politicians
Bureaucrats
Voters and firms express demand for policies through votes and campaign contributions, while politicians and bureaucrats supply policies and public goods.
Political Equilibrium
A political equilibrium occurs when the choices of all groups are compatible, and no group can improve its position by changing its choice.
Median Voter Theorem & Political Economy
Median Voter Theorem: Political candidates tend to adopt policies favored by the median voter to maximize votes.
Asymmetry: Winners from policies are often concentrated, while losers are diffuse, leading to large per-capita gains for winners and small losses for losers.
Classification of Goods
Excludability and Rivalry
Goods and services are classified based on whether they are excludable or nonexcludable, and rival or nonrival.
Excludable: Only those who pay can enjoy the benefits (e.g., private security, farmed fish, ticketed concerts).
Nonexcludable: Impossible or costly to prevent anyone from benefiting (e.g., police services, ocean fish, TV broadcasts).
Rival: One person's use reduces availability for others (e.g., consuming a fish).
Nonrival: One person's use does not reduce availability for others (e.g., watching a TV broadcast).
Four-Fold Classification of Goods
Excludable | Nonexcludable | |
|---|---|---|
Rival | Private Goods Food, drink, car, farmed fish | Common Resources Ocean fish, atmosphere, national parks |
Nonrival | Club Goods Cable TV, bridge/tunnel | Public Goods National defense, law, air traffic control |
Government Provision of Goods
Public Goods: Nonrival and nonexcludable (e.g., national defense).
Common Resources: Rival and nonexcludable (e.g., ocean fish).
Club Goods: Nonrival and excludable (e.g., Netflix, cable TV).
Private Goods: Rival and excludable (e.g., food, farmed fish).
Healthcare and Education
Healthcare: Consists of healthcare services and health insurance. Governments provide these due to market inefficiency and unfair distribution.
Education: Provided by governments because of external benefits—societal gains from an educated population.
Providing Public Goods
The Free-Rider Problem
A free rider benefits from a good or service without paying for it. Public goods create a free-rider problem, as no one can be excluded from their benefits, reducing the incentive to pay.
Valuing Public Goods
Value of a private good: Maximum amount an individual is willing to pay for one more unit.
Value of a public good: Maximum amount all individuals are willing to pay for one more unit.
Total benefit: Dollar value placed on a given quantity of a good.
Marginal benefit: Increase in total benefit from a one-unit increase in quantity.
The marginal benefit of a public good diminishes as quantity increases.
Marginal Social Benefit and Cost
Marginal Social Benefit (MSB): Sum of all individuals' marginal benefits at each quantity.
Marginal Social Cost (MSC): Determined similarly to private goods.
Efficient Quantity: Achieved when .
Equation:
Efficient Provision and Political Competition
Private firms underprovide public goods due to the free-rider problem.
Government provision, funded by taxation, can overcome this problem.
Political competition drives parties to propose the efficient quantity of public goods.
Principle of Minimum Differentiation: Competing parties/firms tend to adopt similar policies/products to appeal to the majority.
Overprovision and Bureaucratic Incentives
Bureaucrats may seek to maximize their department's budget, leading to overprovision of public goods.
Rational Ignorance: Voters may choose not to acquire information about policies if the cost exceeds expected benefit, enabling bureaucratic overprovision and deadweight loss.
The Economics of Healthcare
Market Failure in Healthcare
Healthcare is often underprovided and unfairly distributed in a purely market system due to:
People underestimate the benefits of healthcare.
People underestimate their future healthcare needs.
Many cannot afford necessary care, especially those with chronic conditions or the aged.
Marginal Social Benefit in Healthcare
The marginal social benefit of healthcare exceeds the perceived marginal benefit, leading to inefficient underprovision in competitive markets.
Deadweight loss results when only those able and willing to pay receive care.
Public Funding Approaches
Levels of public funding vary by country (e.g., UK: 83%, Canada: 70%, US: 48%).
Three main approaches:
Universal coverage, single payer (government as sole purchaser)
Private and government insurance (mixed system)
Subsidized private insurance (e.g., Obamacare)
Universal Coverage, Single Payer
Government provides healthcare to all at zero or low price.
Quantity supplied is fixed, often less than efficient quantity, leading to waiting times and some deadweight loss.
Fairness is emphasized, but access may vary based on ability to navigate the system.
Private and Government Insurance
Healthcare provided by private doctors/hospitals, funded by private insurance, government programs, and out-of-pocket payments.
Quantity provided may exceed efficient quantity, creating deadweight loss.
Subsidized Private Insurance (Obamacare)
Government provides subsidies to make insurance affordable.
Subsidy creates a gap between price paid by consumers and price received by insurers.
Increases number of insured, but efficiency depends on whether marginal social benefit exceeds willingness/ability to pay.
Vouchers as an Alternative
Vouchers can be used to buy specified goods (e.g., health insurance).
Advantages:
Can be used with public or private provision
Governments can control total value to prevent overproduction
Distributes public contribution across many consumers
Encourages competition and quality service at lowest cost
Key Equations and Concepts
Efficient Provision of Public Goods:
Marginal Benefit:
Deadweight Loss: Area between MSB and MSC when quantity is not efficient
Summary Table: Classification of Goods
Type of Good | Rival? | Excludable? | Examples |
|---|---|---|---|
Private Good | Yes | Yes | Food, car, farmed fish |
Public Good | No | No | National defense, law |
Common Resource | Yes | No | Ocean fish, atmosphere |
Club Good | No | Yes | Cable TV, bridge/tunnel |
Additional info: These notes expand on the provided slides and text, adding definitions, examples, and equations for clarity and completeness. The tables are reconstructed from the classification scheme described in the materials.