BackMicroeconomics Study Guide: Market Failure, Externalities, Public Goods, Common Goods, and Information
Study Guide - Smart Notes
Tailored notes based on your materials, expanded with key definitions, examples, and context.
Unit 5: Market Failure
Introduction
Market failure occurs when the allocation of goods and services by a free market is not efficient, often leading to a net social welfare loss. Understanding market failure is essential in microeconomics, as it explains why government intervention may be necessary.
Definition: Market failure is a situation in which the market does not allocate resources efficiently on its own.
Main causes: Externalities, public goods, common goods, and information asymmetries.
Externalities
Negative and Positive Externalities
Externalities are costs or benefits that affect third parties who are not directly involved in a transaction. They can be negative (imposing costs) or positive (providing benefits).
Negative Externality: Occurs when an action imposes a cost on others (e.g., pollution).
Positive Externality: Occurs when an action provides a benefit to others (e.g., education).
Efficiency Loss: The difference between the private outcome and the socially optimal (cooperative) outcome.
Example: Pollution from a factory affects nearby residents who are not compensated for the harm.
Formula:
Marginal Social Cost (MSC) = Marginal Private Cost (MPC) + Marginal External Cost (MEC)
Marginal Social Benefit (MSB) = Marginal Private Benefit (MPB) + Marginal External Benefit (MEB)
Coase Theorem
The Coase Theorem states that if property rights are well-defined and transaction costs are low, private parties can negotiate to resolve externalities efficiently without government intervention.
Key Points: Assigning property rights can lead to efficient outcomes.
Limitations: High transaction costs or ill-defined property rights can prevent negotiation.
Taxes and Subsidies
Governments can correct externalities by imposing taxes (for negative externalities) or providing subsidies (for positive externalities).
Pigovian Tax: A tax imposed to correct a negative externality, set equal to the marginal external cost.
Pigovian Subsidy: A subsidy provided to encourage activities with positive externalities, set equal to the marginal external benefit.
Formula:
Pigovian Tax = Marginal External Cost
Pigovian Subsidy = Marginal External Benefit
Public Goods
Characteristics of Public Goods
Public goods are goods that are non-excludable and non-rivalrous, meaning that no one can be prevented from using them and one person's use does not reduce availability to others.
Non-excludable: Cannot prevent people from using the good.
Non-rivalrous: One person's use does not diminish another's use.
Examples: National defense, public parks, street lighting.
The Free-Rider Problem
The free-rider problem occurs when individuals benefit from a good without paying for it, leading to under-provision of public goods.
Key Point: Because people can benefit without paying, private markets may fail to supply public goods efficiently.
Properties of Public Goods
Non-excludable and non-rivalrous
Subject to free-rider problem
Often provided by government
Table: Demand for a Public Good
The following table shows the quantities demanded by Angela and Barbara at various prices. It illustrates how to aggregate individual demand for a public good.
Price | Angela | Barbara | Aggregate |
|---|---|---|---|
0 | 10 | 8 | 18 |
2 | 6 | 4 | 10 |
4 | 4 | 2 | 6 |
6 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Additional info: The aggregate demand for a public good is found by summing individual quantities at each price.
Examples of Public Goods
Taylor Swift concert at Rogers Centre (if open to all)
Public transit and subway systems
National defense
Common Goods
Characteristics of Common Goods
Common goods are non-excludable but rivalrous, meaning anyone can use them, but one person's use reduces availability for others.
Non-excludable: Cannot prevent people from using the good.
Rivalrous: One person's use diminishes another's use.
Examples: Fisheries, public highways, clean air.
Tragedy of the Commons
The tragedy of the commons occurs when individuals overuse a common resource, leading to depletion or degradation.
Key Point: Without regulation, common goods tend to be overused.
Table: Classification of Goods
Type of Good | Rivalrous | Excludable |
|---|---|---|
Private Good | Yes | Yes |
Public Good | No | No |
Common Good | Yes | No |
Club Good | No | Yes |
Additional info: Club goods are excludable but non-rivalrous (e.g., subscription services).
Examples of Common-Goods Problems
Light from a lighthouse
Airport runway at night
Highway toll-free at night
Information
Information Asymmetry
Information asymmetry occurs when one party in a transaction has more or better information than the other, leading to market inefficiency.
Principal-Agent Problem: Occurs when an agent (e.g., employee) has different incentives than the principal (e.g., employer).
Adverse Selection: Occurs when one party takes advantage of having more information (e.g., in insurance markets).
Moral Hazard: Occurs when one party takes more risks because they do not bear the full consequences.
Examples of Information Problems
Lemons and Plums: Used to describe markets with quality uncertainty (e.g., used cars).
Principal-Agent: Employees may not act in the best interest of employers.
Adverse Selection: Purchasing insurance when you know you are at higher risk.
Moral Hazard: Taking more risks after obtaining insurance.
Table: Information Problems
Problem | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
Principal-Agent | Agent acts in own interest, not principal's | Employee shirking at work |
Adverse Selection | One party has hidden information before transaction | High-risk individuals buying insurance |
Moral Hazard | One party changes behavior after transaction | Driving recklessly after buying car insurance |
Summary Table: Types of Goods
Type | Rivalrous | Excludable | Examples |
|---|---|---|---|
Private Good | Yes | Yes | Food, clothing |
Public Good | No | No | National defense, street lighting |
Common Good | Yes | No | Fisheries, clean air |
Club Good | No | Yes | Subscription TV, private parks |
Additional info: These classifications help determine the appropriate policy response to market failures.