Monopolistic Competition, Oligopoly, and Game Theory in Microeconomics

Study Guide - Smart Notes

Tailored notes based on your materials, expanded with key definitions, examples, and context.

Monopolistic Competition and Other Market Structures

Market Concentration

Market concentration measures the extent to which a small number of firms dominate total sales in a market. It is a key indicator of market structure and competitiveness.

Four-Firm Concentration Ratio: The percentage of total market revenue accounted for by the four largest firms.
Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI): The sum of the squares of the market shares of each firm in the market. It is used to assess the level of competition.

Example: If Firm 1 has 50% market share, Firm 2 has 25%, Firm 3 has 15%, and Firm 4 has 10%, then:

Limitations: Concentration measures may not capture all aspects of market power, such as barriers to entry or product differentiation.

Characteristics of Monopolistic Competition

Monopolistic competition is a market structure characterized by many firms selling similar but not identical products.

Large number of firms: Each firm has a small market share and limited market power.
Product differentiation: Firms compete on product quality, price, and marketing.
Free entry and exit: Firms can enter or leave the market with relative ease.

Characteristic	Perfect Competition	Monopolistic Competition	Oligopoly	Monopoly
Number of firms	Many	Many	Few	One
Type of product	Identical	Differentiated	Identical or differentiated	Unique
Barriers to entry	None	Low	High	Very high
Examples	Wheat, corn	Shampoo, shoes	Airlines, autos	Cable TV

Price and Output in Monopolistic Competition

Short-Run Price and Output Decision

In the short run, a firm in monopolistic competition behaves similarly to a monopolist, choosing output where marginal revenue equals marginal cost.

Firms can earn economic profits or losses in the short run.

Long-Run Equilibrium

In the long run, entry and exit of firms drive economic profit to zero.

Firms produce at a level where price equals average total cost.
Excess capacity and markup exist compared to perfect competition.

Comparison with Perfect Competition

Markup: Price exceeds marginal cost in monopolistic competition.
Excess capacity: Firms do not produce at minimum average cost.

Efficiency in Monopolistic Competition

Monopolistic competition may not achieve allocative or productive efficiency due to product differentiation and excess capacity.

Product Development and Marketing

Product Development

Firms innovate to differentiate their products and gain market share, but innovation is costly and may not always lead to efficiency.

Incentive to innovate arises from potential entry by other firms.
Firms weigh marginal benefits against marginal costs.

Advertising

Advertising is used to increase demand and differentiate products.

All firms can advertise, which may lead to higher costs but also higher demand.
Efficiency of advertising and brand names depends on whether it provides useful information or simply increases costs.

Example: Compare market outcomes when all firms advertise versus when no firms advertise. Advertising can shift demand curves and affect equilibrium price and quantity.

Oligopoly

Definition and Characteristics

An oligopoly is a market structure with a small number of firms, significant barriers to entry, and interdependent decision-making.

Barriers to entry: High, due to economies of scale, patents, or control of resources.
Small number of firms: Each firm must consider the actions of rivals when making decisions.

Oligopoly Games and Game Theory

Prisoner's Dilemma

The prisoner's dilemma illustrates how rational decision-makers may not cooperate, even when it is in their best interest.

	P2: Don't confess	P2: Confess
P1: Don't confess	(5,5)	(20,2)
P1: Confess	(2,20)	(15,15)

Simultaneous choices: Each player chooses without knowing the other's choice.
Full information: Payoffs are known to both players.

Dominant Strategy and Nash Equilibrium

Dominant strategy: A strategy that yields the highest payoff regardless of the other player's action.
Nash equilibrium: Each player chooses the best strategy given the other player's choice, maximizing their own payoff.

Example: Two firms choose between low price and high price. Payoff matrix:

	Firm 2: Low Price	Firm 2: High Price
Firm 1: Low Price	(10,10)	(20,5)
Firm 1: High Price	(6,20)	(15,15)

Game of Chicken

The game of Chicken models situations where two players can either cooperate or risk a costly conflict.

	Apple's advantage	Samsung's advantage
Apple	50	20
Samsung	20	50

Repeated Games and Sequential Games

Repeated Games

In repeated games, players interact multiple times, allowing for strategies like Tit for Tat, which can sustain cooperation.

	Canada Brand: Tit for Tat	Canada Brand: Always cheat
Website Bakeries: Tit for Tat	(100+100 each year)	(100+100 each year)
Website Bakeries: Always cheat	(400+100 each year)	(400+100 each year)

Example: If firms collude in the first period, they may continue to collude in future periods.

Sequential Entry Games

Sequential games involve players making decisions one after another, with later players observing earlier actions. Backward induction is used to solve these games.

Backward induction: Analyzing the game from the end to determine optimal strategies at each stage.

Anti-Combine Law

Anti-combine laws are designed to prevent collusion and promote competition. (Read by yourselves)

Additional info: Some tables and diagrams were inferred and reconstructed for clarity. Academic context was added to ensure completeness and self-contained explanations.