BackOptimization, Game Theory, and Equilibrium in Microeconomics
Study Guide - Smart Notes
Tailored notes based on your materials, expanded with key definitions, examples, and context.
Optimization, Games, and Equilibrium
Introduction to Optimization
Optimization is a fundamental concept in microeconomics, describing how economic agents (such as individuals or firms) make choices to achieve the best possible outcome given their constraints. An agent is said to be optimizing when they select the best feasible option available to them.
Optimization using total value: Involves calculating the total value (benefit minus cost) of each feasible option and choosing the one with the highest total value.
Optimization using marginal analysis: Focuses on the change in total value when moving from one option to another, using these marginal comparisons to select the best option.
Both methods yield identical answers when applied correctly.
Game Theory and Equilibrium
Many economic problems involve strategic interactions between multiple agents, which are best analyzed using game theory. A game is a multi-person decision problem where the outcome for each participant depends on the choices of others.
Nash Equilibrium: A situation in which each agent chooses a strategy that maximizes their benefit, given the strategies chosen by others. No agent can improve their outcome by unilaterally changing their strategy.
Game theory is used to predict outcomes in competitive and cooperative environments.
Optimization: Choosing the Best Feasible Option
Challenges in Optimization
Even when aiming to optimize, agents may face difficulties:
Limited information
Complexity in sorting through information
Lack of experience with the situation
Making the best choice does not always guarantee a good outcome due to uncertainty or external factors
Optimization Techniques
There are two primary techniques for optimization in microeconomics:
Total Value Method: Calculate net benefit as total benefit minus total cost for each option.
Marginal Analysis: Compare the change in net benefit (marginal benefit minus marginal cost) when moving from one option to another. The optimal choice is where marginal benefit equals marginal cost.
Formula:
Total Net Benefit:
Marginal Benefit:
Marginal Cost:
Optimization Condition:
Optimization Application: Choosing the Best Feasible Option
Steps for Optimization Using Total Value
Translate all costs and benefits into common units (e.g., dollars per month).
Calculate the total net benefit for each alternative.
Select the alternative with the highest net benefit.
Example: Scrolling Tablet or Phone
Suppose you are deciding how many hours per day to spend watching videos or reading news on your tablet or smartphone. The following table summarizes the total benefits and costs for different hours spent:
Hours (watching/reading) | Total benefits (amusement or knowledge) | Total costs (mental and physical fatigue; missing out on lecture, homework, and social activities) |
|---|---|---|
1 | $35 | $20 |
2 | $70 | $40 |
3 | $90 | $65 |
4 | $100 | $100 |
Net Benefit Calculation
Hours | Benefit | Cost | Net Benefit |
|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1 | 35 | 20 | 15 |
2 | 70 | 40 | 30 |
3 | 90 | 65 | 25 |
4 | 100 | 100 | 0 |
Example: The optimal number of hours is 2, as it yields the highest net benefit ($30).
Optimization Using Marginal Analysis
Steps for Marginal Analysis
Translate all costs and benefits into common units.
Calculate the marginal consequences (marginal benefit and marginal cost) of moving between alternatives.
Choose the best alternative where moving to it makes you better off and moving away makes you worse off.
Marginal Analysis Table
Hours | Benefit | Marginal Benefit | Cost | Marginal Cost | MB-MC | Net Benefit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 |
1 | 35 | 35 | 20 | 20 | 15 | 15 |
2 | 70 | 35 | 40 | 20 | 15 | 30 |
3 | 90 | 20 | 65 | 25 | -5 | 25 |
4 | 100 | 10 | 100 | 35 | -25 | 0 |
Example: The optimal choice is where marginal benefit equals marginal cost. Here, the net benefit is maximized at 2 hours.
Application: New Tablet (Lower Costs)
If costs are reduced (e.g., due to less eye fatigue), the optimal number of hours may change:
Hours | Benefit | Cost | Net Benefit |
|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1 | 35 | 20 | 15 |
2 | 70 | 35 | 35 |
3 | 90 | 50 | 40 |
4 | 100 | 75 | 25 |
Example: With lower costs, the optimal number of hours increases to 3, where net benefit is maximized at $40.
Summary Table: Optimization Approaches
Method | Key Steps | Optimality Condition |
|---|---|---|
Total Value | Calculate net benefit for each option; choose the highest | Maximum net benefit |
Marginal Analysis | Compare marginal benefit and marginal cost between options | Marginal Benefit = Marginal Cost |
Key Terms and Definitions
Optimization: The process of choosing the best feasible option given constraints.
Net Benefit: The difference between total benefit and total cost.
Marginal Benefit (MB): The additional benefit from one more unit of an activity.
Marginal Cost (MC): The additional cost from one more unit of an activity.
Nash Equilibrium: A set of strategies where no player can benefit by changing their strategy while others keep theirs unchanged.
Game Theory: The study of strategic interactions among rational decision-makers.
Additional info: The notes also reference graphical analysis and the importance of comparing net benefits visually, as well as the application of these concepts to real-world decision-making scenarios.