Skip to main content
Back

lec 31

Study Guide - Smart Notes

Tailored notes based on your materials, expanded with key definitions, examples, and context.

Mysteries of Evolutionary Biology

Introduction to Evolutionary Mysteries

Evolutionary biology seeks to explain not only the diversity of life but also puzzling behaviors that seem to contradict the principle of individual fitness. Some behaviors, such as alarm calling, homosexual behavior, and menopause, appear to reduce an individual's direct reproductive success. Understanding these phenomena requires integrating concepts such as kin selection, inclusive fitness, and adaptive versus non-adaptive explanations.

Altruism and Alarm Calling

Alarm Calling in Animals

Alarm calling is a behavior in which an individual emits a warning signal to alert conspecifics (members of the same species) to the presence of a predator. This behavior is widespread in social animals, including birds, mammals, and insects. Although alarm calling can increase the caller's risk of predation, it benefits the group by increasing the survival chances of relatives and other group members.

  • Definition: Altruism is a behavior that benefits another individual at a cost to the actor.

  • Example: Prairie dogs and ground squirrels are well-known for their alarm calls when predators are near.

Meerkats standing alert, an example of alarm calling and vigilance in social animals

Functional Explanations for Alarm Calling

Several hypotheses have been proposed to explain the evolution of alarm calling and similar altruistic behaviors:

  • Kin Selection Hypothesis: Individuals increase their inclusive fitness by helping relatives survive and reproduce.

  • Reciprocal Altruism: Individuals help others with the expectation that the favor will be returned in the future.

  • Selfish Herd Effect: Alarm calling may reduce the caller's risk by causing confusion or by positioning the caller in the center of the group.

Alarm Calling in Prairie Dogs

Prairie dogs provide a classic example of kin-selected alarm calling. Studies show that prairie dogs are more likely to give alarm calls when close relatives are present, supporting the kin selection hypothesis.

Prairie dogs in a colony, illustrating social structure and kin selectionPrairie dog standing alert, a typical posture during alarm calling

Empirical Evidence: Alarm Calling and Kin Presence

Experimental data demonstrate that the presence of kin increases the likelihood of alarm calling in prairie dogs, especially among females. This supports the idea that alarm calling is an altruistic behavior favored by kin selection.

Bar graph showing percentage of simulated badger attacks in which prairie dogs gave alarm calls, with and without kin present

Kin Selection and Inclusive Fitness

Hamilton's Rule

W.D. Hamilton formalized the concept of kin selection with the following rule:

  • B: Benefit to the recipient

  • r: Coefficient of relatedness between actor and recipient

  • C: Cost to the actor

Altruism will evolve if the benefit to the recipient, weighted by relatedness, exceeds the cost to the actor.

Diagram showing coefficients of relatedness for half-siblings, full-siblings, and cousins

Inclusive Fitness

Inclusive fitness is the sum of an individual's direct fitness (from personal reproduction) and indirect fitness (from aiding the reproduction of relatives). Natural selection acting on inclusive fitness is termed kin selection.

  • Direct fitness: Results from an individual's own reproduction.

  • Indirect fitness: Results from the reproduction of relatives, weighted by relatedness.

Classification of Social Interactions

Social interactions can be classified based on their effects on the actor and the recipient:

Recipient benefits

Recipient is harmed

Actor benefits

Mutualism

Selfishness

Actor is harmed

Altruism

Spite

Matrix classifying social interactions: mutualism, altruism, selfishness, spite

Flagging Behavior in White-Tailed Deer

Tail Flagging as an Alarm Signal

White-tailed deer exhibit a conspicuous tail-flagging behavior when alarmed. Several hypotheses have been proposed to explain this behavior, including signaling to conspecifics and confusing predators.

White-tailed deer displaying tail-flagging behavior

Functional Hypotheses for Tail Flagging

The following table summarizes predictions from different hypotheses explaining tail-flagging in white-tailed deer:

Hypothesis

Tail Flagging Directed at Predator Rather than Conspecifics

Tail Flagging Only when Conspecifics Are Present

Tail Flagging More Frequent at Safe Distances

Flash behavior

Yes

No

No prediction

Risk-free alarm signal

No prediction

Yes

No prediction

Risk-prone alarm signal

No

Yes

No

Cohesive signal

No prediction

Yes

No prediction

Detection signal

Yes

No

No

Table summarizing functional explanations for tail flagging in white-tailed deer

Kin Selection and Altruism in Bats

Reciprocal Altruism in Vampire Bats

Vampire bats exhibit reciprocal food sharing, where individuals regurgitate blood meals to feed unrelated conspecifics who have failed to feed. This behavior is explained by reciprocal altruism, where the cost to the donor is outweighed by the expectation of future reciprocation.

Vampire bat, an example of reciprocal altruismColony of vampire bats, illustrating social structure and food sharing

Evolution of Homosexual Behavior

Homosexual Behavior in Animals

Homosexual behavior is observed in many animal species and is not unique to humans. Its evolutionary basis is debated, with both adaptive and non-adaptive explanations proposed.

  • Heritability: Sexual orientation shows heritability in humans (Pillard & Bailey 1998).

  • Hormonal influences: Prenatal hormone exposure may play a role (Balthazart 2011).

  • Neuroanatomical differences: Differences in the hypothalamus and brain structure have been observed (LeVay 1991; Swabb & Hofman 1990).

  • Fraternal Birth Order Effect: Increased likelihood of homosexuality in men with more older brothers, possibly due to maternal immune response (Puts et al. 2006).

Theories Explaining Evolution of Homosexual Behavior

  • Non-adaptive explanations:

    • Mistaken identity

    • Prison effect (deprivation-induced)

    • Evolutionary byproduct

    • Pleasure hypothesis

  • Adaptive explanations:

    • Social glue (bonding and alliance formation)

    • Practice for courtship and mating

    • Overdominance (heterozygote advantage)

    • Kin selection (increasing inclusive fitness by aiding relatives)

Evolution of Menopause: The Grandmother Hypothesis

Post-Reproductive Lifespan in Social Species

Most female animals reproduce throughout their lives, but a few species, including humans and some whales, have a prolonged post-reproductive lifespan. The grandmother hypothesis suggests that menopause evolved because post-reproductive females increase their inclusive fitness by helping care for grandchildren.

  • Many hands theory: Grandmothers assist with childcare, increasing survival of grandchildren.

  • Inclusive fitness theory: Grandmothers who provide care increase their genetic contribution to future generations.

  • Longevity genes: Postmenopausal lifespan may be a byproduct of genes for longevity.

Diagram summarizing kin selection and evolutionary explanations for post-reproductive lifespan

Summary: Kin Selection and Evolutionary Theory

Evolution is defined as changes in allele frequencies in a population over generations. Kin selection and inclusive fitness provide powerful frameworks for understanding seemingly paradoxical behaviors such as alarm calling, altruism, postmenopausal longevity, and possibly homosexual behavior. These effects are most pronounced in social animals living in groups with many related individuals.

Pearson Logo

Study Prep