BackScientific Investigation: Steps, Hypotheses, and Theories
Study Guide - Smart Notes
Tailored notes based on your materials, expanded with key definitions, examples, and context.
Scientific Investigation
Introduction to Scientific Investigation
Scientific investigations are systematic processes used by scientists to explain observations and test the conclusions of previous studies. These investigations follow a series of logical steps, though the order may vary depending on the situation. Creativity, imagination, and a strong knowledge base are essential components of scientific inquiry.
Steps of a Scientific Investigation
Make Observations: Gathering information about phenomena or events using the senses or scientific tools.
Ask a Question: Formulating a question based on observations to guide the investigation.
Form a Hypothesis: Proposing a logical, testable explanation or prediction that addresses the question.
Test the Hypothesis: Designing and conducting experiments or studies to collect data and evaluate the hypothesis.
Draw Conclusions: Analyzing data to determine whether the results support or refute the hypothesis.
Communicate Results: Sharing findings with others through reports, presentations, or publications.
Key Points to Remember
Hypothesis: Must be logical, based on scientific knowledge, and testable. It can be supported or not supported by observational evidence.
Experiments: Designed to test hypotheses. They usually test how one variable (independent variable) affects another (dependent variable), while all other parameters are controlled.
Example: In an experiment to test the effect of sunlight on plant growth:
Independent variable: Amount of sunlight
Dependent variable: Plant height
Controlled variables: Amount of water, soil type, etc.
Other Types of Scientific Investigations:
Natural Studies: Observing phenomena in nature where variables cannot be controlled.
Modeling: Creating models (representations) to better understand complex systems or processes.
Accurate Measurements: Reliable data and careful observations are essential for drawing valid conclusions.
Hypotheses vs. Theories
Definitions and Differences
Scientific theories and hypotheses are both important in the scientific method, but they differ in scope and level of support.
Hypothesis: A tentative explanation or prediction that can be tested through experimentation and observation. A group of related hypotheses may be tested many times and require substantial supporting evidence before being accepted as a theory.
Theory: A well-established, broad explanation for a wide range of phenomena, supported by a large body of evidence. Theories are generally accepted as true but can change if new discoveries are made.
Theories have almost always been tested multiple times by independent scientists to ensure accuracy.
If an observation does not agree with an accepted scientific theory, further experimentation is necessary to determine whether the observation is mistaken or the theory needs revision.
Summary Table: Hypotheses vs. Theories
Aspect | Hypothesis | Theory |
|---|---|---|
Definition | Tentative explanation or prediction | Well-established explanation for a broad range of phenomena |
Testing | Tested through experiments and observations | Supported by extensive evidence and repeated testing |
Acceptance | Not widely accepted until supported by evidence | Generally accepted by the scientific community |
Changeability | Can be rejected or modified based on results | Can change if new evidence contradicts it |
Additional info: The scientific method is iterative; scientists may repeat steps or revise hypotheses and theories as new data become available.