A government health agency (.gov) posts a summary of nutrition guidance citing multiple systematic reviews. According to green-flag criteria, which claim about this source is most justified?

A .gov summary guarantees the finding applies to every individual regardless of age, sex, or health status.

It must be biased because governments always underreport benefits of nutritional products sold by private companies.

It is likely a reputable source because government agencies usually synthesize peer-reviewed evidence and note population relevance, though individual applicability still requires checking study details.

Any .gov source is considered primary experimental research and therefore does not require further validation or peer review checking.