Tailoring language learning for diverse needs with the GSE

Hebatallah Morsy
Hebatallah Morsy
Children sat next to their teacher in a classroom, smiling at eachother
Czas czytania: 5 minutes

Why inclusive language teaching matters more than ever

You’ve probably heard the word “inclusive” more and more in recent years, though I first encountered it over 20 years ago. (I say 20 because that’s when I graduated, and we had a course on diverse learners called “individual differences.” But back then, actually meeting their needs wasn’t nearly as comprehensive as it is today.)

Today, learners come with a wide range of proficiency levels, cognitive styles, educational background, and personal goals. That’s why ensuring equitable learning opportunities is no longer optional — it’s essential. In simple terms, inclusive teaching means making sure all learners feel they belong and can succeed.

It calls for differentiated instruction, flexible assessment and learning materials that respect individual needs. That’s where the Global Scale of English (GSE) comes in.

Inclusive language teaching with the GSE
Play
Privacy and cookies
By watching, you agree Pearson can share your viewership data for marketing and analytics for one year, revocable upon changing cookie preferences. Disabling cookies may affect video functionality. More info...

What is the GSE and why is it useful for inclusion?

The Global Scale of English (GSE), acts like a detailed map of English proficiency, breaking down skills in listening, speaking, reading, and writing from 10 to 90. Its “can-do” statements clearly show what learners can do at each stage, removing guesswork about their readiness. Instead of just labeling a student as "intermediate", you can specify skills like "taking messages", "communicating enquiries" and "explaining problems" (GSE 53 – Skill: writing).

These descriptors are "SMART":

  • Specific
  • Measurable
  • Achievable 
  • Realistic
  • Time-bound

This supports the kind of individualized goal-setting that inclusive teaching demands (Kormos, 2017).

How the GSE supports inclusive teaching practices

Understanding learner profiles with the GSE

One of the first steps in inclusive teaching is figuring out each learner's starting point, which is challenging in a diverse classroom. The GSE helps track progress in listening, speaking, reading and writing, offering clearer insights into students' skills.

For example, two learners in the same "intermediate" class may have different skills: one may excel in discussion but struggle with writing, while the other may be the opposite. The GSE can identify these differences, allowing tailored support instead of generic solutions.

Setting personalized goals for progress

Once you understand your learners' starting point, the next step is knowing where and how to guide them. The GSE simplifies this with its library of clear, ready-to-use "can-do" statements. Unlike vague goals such as “improve reading” these are specific targets like “Can understand short, simple personal emails and letters” (GSE 37). This clarity helps learners see progress and keeps your planning and feedback focused.

Example: For a learner with dyslexia who excels in speaking and listening but struggles with reading and writing, the GSE allows you to highlight strengths like “Can give or seek personal views and opinions in discussing topics of interest.” (GSE 46) and areas for support such as “Can make simple, logical paragraph breaks in a longer text.” (GSE 45).

Planning inclusive lessons and activities

Now that you’ve set personalized goals, you can adapt one task to meet various needs in the classroom while staying aligned with the same learning outcome. No need for multiple lesson plans – just tweak the task with the GSE as your guide.

To make that happen, you might:

  • Provide differentiated task sheets
  • Offer varied texts
  • Adjust the complexity of output
  • Use flexible grouping

Example: If the class aims for "Can write an email” (GSE 36–50), one group uses a sentence-starter, another writes freely, and a third refines tone and style. It’s the same task, adapted to each learner's level.

And what about ESP? If you’re teaching something like English for Nursing, the GSE can still help, for example, by timing your content so that learners won’t be overwhelmed.

Example – English for Nursing:

  • GSE 50: Can make a set of instructions easier to understand by uttering them slowly, a few words or signs at a time, employing verbal and non-verbal emphasis to facilitate understanding.
  • GSE 62: Can describe how to do something, giving detailed instructions.

Instead of jumping into complex hospital vocabulary too soon, you can scaffold toward it with general English descriptors.

Designing inclusive assessments

Assessment can make or break an inclusive classroom. Done well, it opens doors; done poorly, it can shut them. The GSE helps you design assessments that:

  • Reflect real skill growth
  • Allow different ways to demonstrate learning
  • Maintain high standards with flexibility

To make this work in practice, you can:

  • Use performance-based tasks (like presentations or role-plays)
  • Build portfolios that show progress over time
  • Add self- and peer-assessment using GSE descriptors
  • Offer flexible formats (such as oral, written, visual and tech-based)

Example: For the goal “Can understand short, simple personal emails and letters", let learners choose between writing to a friend, replying to an invitation, or requesting information from a company. The objective is the same, but the paths to get there are different.

And for learners who are neurodiverse? You can:

  • Break tasks into smaller steps (chunking)
  • Use visual checklists tied to “can-do” goals
  • Simplify instructions without watering down the objective
  • Add audio or visual options to support processing

These aren’t extra accommodations, they’re examples of good teaching.

To recap, the GSE helps us set goals with students, track progress via portfolios, offer task choices, scaffold lessons, introduce ESP content when ready and design group work based on GSE strengths.

Read our blog posts 'GSE Teacher Toolkit: Teaching mixed ability classes' and 'Why don’t my students speak English in class?'.

Learn more about the GSE

About the author

Hebatallah Morsy has over 18 years of experience in teaching, curriculum design, and educational leadership. She’s worked with prestigious national and international organizations, where she’s led everything from curriculum development to launching creative initiatives like extracurricular clubs for eager learners. A regular at ELT conferences, she enjoys sharing insights on educational development, assessment, and teacher growth—always with a fresh perspective and a thoughtful approach.

More blogs from Pearson

  • Woman writing on whiteboard with two women watching her, smiling
    Writing your own English language materials with the GSE
    By Billie Jago
    Czas czytania: 4 minutes

    Being an English language teacher means you’re also probably (definitely) a materials writer. You likely tailor or create language materials for your students that are suited to their needs and interests, either as supplements to your course materials or for communicative lessons. Alternatively, you might be a teacher who creates paid, published materials available for students worldwide to enjoy.

    With this in mind, think of the materials you’ve developed and ask yourself the following:

    • How do you level your grammar or vocabulary for the content you write?
    • How do you find topic-related vocabulary to extend your students’ knowledge of language?
    • How do you contextualize new grammar or vocabulary?

    You can use many different resources, from online dictionaries to course workbooks to a Google search. Still, the Global Scale of English is a reference that provides everything you need to write great learning materials, all in one place. It can help save you valuable time as a teacher and materials writer.

    For me, the GSE was a game changer as an English teacher, and it continues to be as I write materials. The GSE is not just a tool; it’s a companion in the complex journey of material development, offering clarity and direction at every step. It can guide you in creating effective, engaging learning resources.

    How to use the GSE toolkit to create your own materials

    1. Establishing clear Learning Objectives

    The GSE helps you start with a clear roadmap. It provides detailed descriptors for language proficiency at every level, ensuring your materials align with specific learning objectives. For instance, if you’re creating a beginner-level reading comprehension activity, the GSE descriptors will guide you on the appropriate complexity of vocabulary and sentence structures.

    Take a look at the Learning Objectives tab in the GSE Toolkit to learn more.

    2. Designing level-appropriate content

    Once objectives are set, the GSE assists in tailoring the content difficulty to the targeted proficiency level. Its numerical scale, ranging from 10 to 90, allows you to pinpoint the exact level of language skills required and design your materials accordingly. This precision ensures that learners are neither overwhelmed nor under-challenged.

    You can set the level you are looking for by sliding the bar along the scale, so it corresponds to the appropriate CEFR level or GSE range.

  • Friends sat on a moving train together talking
    What is the hardest language to learn?
    By Charlotte Guest
    Czas czytania: 4 minutes

    It's incredible that thousands of languages are spoken worldwide, each with its own set of challenges for learners. A question that often pops up is: "Which language is the hardest to learn?". Today we take a closer look at this question and consider different factors that make learning a language challenging.

    What is the hardest language to learn? 

    Learning a language is a complex process that involves several components, including phonetics (sounds), morphology (word formation), syntax (sentence structure), semantics (meaning), and pragmatics (communication in context). These factors all contribute to the perceived difficulty of a language.

    Language difficulty

    The U.S. Foreign Service Institute ranks languages based on their difficulty for English speakers. Factors include similarity to English and script complexity.

    FSI Language Difficulty Rankings

    • Category I: Easiest languages (e.g. Spanish, French, Italian)
    • Category II: Moderately difficult languages (e.g. German, Indonesian)
    • Category III: Difficult languages (e.g. Russian, Hebrew, Arabic)
    • Category IV: Very difficult languages (e.g. Chinese, Japanese, Korean)

    In theory, you should also be able to apply this the other way around to work out how hard It would be for someone to learn English. But it isn't quite as simple as that in practice.

  • A man working on a laptop in a library smiling
    Are remote English tests lower standard?
    By Alice Bazzi
    Czas czytania: 2 minutes

    As digital testing becomes more widespread, a common perception still persists: that remote testing or at-home tests are somehow lower in quality than traditional test center exams. For institutions and governments, this raises an important question: does the delivery format impact the standard of assessment? 

    The reality is, the quality of the test is defined by design, scoring and security, not by location. 

    PTE Express is built on the same core principles as established English proficiency tests, including rigorous test development, validated content and standardized scoring processes. The academic integrity of the test remains consistent regardless of whether it is taken in a test center or from home. 

    In many ways, remote testing introduces additional layers of oversight. PTE Express incorporates advanced features such as biometric identity verification, AI-enabled monitoring and fraud detection algorithms to ensure that each test session meets strict security standards. These systems provide continuous monitoring and create detailed audit trails, offering institutions greater transparency into how tests are conducted and validated. 

    For US institutions evaluating large volumes of international applicants, this ensures that remote scores can be trusted to meet the same standards as in-person testing without limiting access based on geography.

    Governments also benefit from scalable, secure testing solutions that support broader participation while maintaining compliance and integrity. Agents, in turn, can confidently recommend remote testing options knowing they deliver both accessibility and credibility. 

    The bottom line 

    Remote testing is not a lower standard, but it is an evolution of English testing delivery. PTE Express demonstrates that it is possible to maintain high-quality, secure and globally consistent assessment in a fully online format.