How to assess your learners using the GSE Assessment Frameworks

Billie Jago
Billie Jago
A teachet stood in front of a class in front of a board, smiling at his students.
Reading time: 4 minutes

With language learning, assessing both the quality and the quantity of language use is crucial for accurate proficiency evaluation. While evaluating quantity (for example the number of words written or the duration of spoken production) can provide insights into a learner's fluency and engagement in a task, it doesn’t show a full picture of a learner’s language competence. For this, they would also need to be evaluated on the quality of what they produce (such as the appropriateness, accuracy and complexity of language use). The quality also considers factors such as grammatical accuracy, lexical choice, coherence and the ability to convey meaning effectively.

In order to measure the quality of different language skills, you can use the Global Scale of English (GSE) assessment frameworks.

Developed in collaboration with assessment experts, the GSE Assessment Frameworks are intended to be used alongside the GSE Learning Objectives to help you assess the proficiency of your learners.

There are two GSE Assessment Frameworks: one for adults and one for young learners.

What are the GSE Assessment Frameworks?

  • The GSE Assessment Frameworks are intended to be used alongside the GSE Learning Objectives to help teachers assess their learners’ proficiency of all four skills (speaking, listening, reading and writing).
  • The GSE Learning Objectives focus on the things a learner can do, while the GSE Assessment Frameworks focus on how well a learner can do these things.
  • It can help provide you with examples of what proficiencies your learners should be demonstrating.  
  • It can help teachers pinpoint students' specific areas of strength and weakness more accurately, facilitating targeted instruction and personalized learning plans.
  • It can also help to motivate your learners, as their progress is evidenced and they can see a clear path for improvement.

An example of the GSE Assessment Frameworks

This example is from the Adult Assessment Framework for speaking.

As you can see, there are sub-skills within speaking (and for the other three main overarching skills – writing, listening and reading). Within speaking, these are production and fluency, spoken interaction, language range and accuracy.

The GSE range (and corresponding CEFR level) is shown at the top of each column, and there are descriptors that students should ideally demonstrate at that level.

However, it is important to note that students may sit across different ranges, depending on the sub-skill. For example, your student may show evidence of GSE 43-50 production and fluency and spoken interaction, but they may need to improve their language range and accuracy, and therefore sit in a range of GSE 36-42 for these sub-skills.

The GSE assessment frameworks in practice  let’s try

So, how can you use these frameworks as a teacher in your lesson? Let’s look at an example.

Imagine you are teaching a class of adult learners at GSE 43-50 (B1). This week, your class has been working towards writing an essay about living in the city vs the countryside. Your class has just written their final essay and you want to assess what they have produced.

Look at the writing sub-skills in the GSE Assessment Framework for adults. Imagine these are the criteria you are using to assess your students’ writing.

You read one of your student's essays, and in their essay they demonstrate that they can:

  • Express their opinion on the advantages and disadvantages of living in the city vs the countryside
  • Make relevant points which are mostly on-topic
  • Use topic-related language
  • Connect their ideas logically and in a way that flows well
  • Write in clear paragraphs

However, you notice that:

  • They tend to repeat common words, such as city, town, countryside, nice, busy
  • They don’t use punctuation effectively, for example missing commas, long sentences, missing capitalization
  • They have some issues with grammatical structures

Compare the above notes to the GSE Assessment Frameworks. What level is your learner demonstrating in each sub-skill? How could you evidence this using the criteria?

Now, compare your answers to the ideas below.

The points marked in the GSE 43-50 column are evidence that the student is at the expected writing level for their class, based on what you observed in their essay. The points marked in the GSE 36-42 column could be shown to the student to tell them what they need to focus on to improve, based on their essay.

Customizing the GSE assessment frameworks

The GSE Assessment Frameworks are flexible and customizable, and you can use the descriptors for your specific purpose. You can choose the appropriate GSE Assessment Frameworks for your context, and build your own formative assessment based on these.

In the example above, you were only assessing an essay, so you could ignore any contexts that were not applicable to that scenario. For example, writes personal and semi-formal letters and emails relating to everyday matters, or incorporates some relevant details from external sources.

Another benefit of the frameworks is that you can personalize assessments and create tailored learning roadmaps for individual students. Of course, not all learners are the same, so the descriptors allow students to see which sub-skill they need to work on in order to bring their writing (or speaking, listening or reading) up to their expected level. It also helps you as the teacher to understand what sub-skills to focus on in lessons to improve these main skills.

Finally, don’t be afraid to introduce your students to these descriptors or translate them into the learner's first language for lower levels. It is a great way for them to pinpoint and reflect on their strengths and areas for improvement, rather than simply getting a score and not understanding how to get to the next level of confidence and ability.

By incorporating the GSE Assessment Frameworks into your course for formative assessment, you can build students’ confidence and help them better reflect on their learning.

More blogs from Pearson

  • A woman and man working together on laptop in library
    AI in Language Education: What educators should use (and what to avoid)
    By Charlotte Guest
    Reading time: 5 minutes

    AI is changing language classrooms fast, but not every tool adds value. The best teachers use AI as a partner, supporting planning, feedback and differentiation, while keeping key moments of teaching human.

    Here’s what works, what to avoid, and how to use AI responsibly in ESL classrooms.

    How AI is transforming language teaching

    AI is transforming how teachers work, but it doesn't replace them.

    At its best, AI enhances three core areas:

    • Planning efficiency: Generate lesson outlines, activities and scaffolding in minutes
    • Differentiation at scale: Adapt materials for mixed-level classrooms instantly
    • Feedback loops: Provide faster, more frequent feedback on writing and practice tasks

    But the key shift is pedagogical. AI aligns naturally with:

    • Learner-centered methods: Students engage more actively with adaptive content
    • Teaching like a coach: Teachers guide, refine and personalize rather than deliver everything directly
    • Modern teaching methodology: Blended, flexible and responsive instruction

    When used effectively, AI allows teachers to concentrate on the most important aspects of language learning: interaction, communication and human connection.

  • A woman smiling working on a laptop
    Studying in the USA? A fast at-home English test is now an option
    By Abi Fordham
    Reading time: 2 minutes

    If you’re a student planning to study in the USA, life probably feels a bit like having too many tabs open at once. University sites. Visa info. Messages from friends already abroad. And a growing list of things that all feel important.

    Somewhere in the middle of that is your English test.

    A test people trust for good reason

    For years, students have chosen PTE because it’s built to be trusted, backed by real expertise, research and quality. That’s why it’s become a familiar name for students planning to study abroad, and why institutions trust it too. That foundation hasn’t changed. What has changed is how students live, learn, and prepare today.

    Same roots, for different routes

    PTE Express originates from the same principles. Same values. Same attention. It’s simply tailored for a different kind of test taker at a specific point in their journey. If you’re aiming to study in the USA and need a quick, at-home English test, PTE Express is made to fit into your life rather than forcing you to reshape everything around a test date. And let’s address test anxiety because it’s a real concern.

    Many students worry about English tests. Not because they don’t know English, but because test situations can make things feel harder than they should be. Speaking to an examiner face‑to‑face can feel intimidating. Worrying about being misunderstood because of your accent is a real concern. Travelling to a test centre adds pressure before you even start. Sitting in an unfamiliar room can make nerves worse.

    That’s not a lack of ability. That’s just being human. While PTE Academic already addresses lots of these worries, we have gone a step further with PTE Express.

    Why at‑home testing can feel different

    One of the quiet benefits of an at‑home test is how much calmer it can feel. You’re in a familiar space. You control your environment. There’s no examiner in front of you, just you and the screen. For many students, that makes it easier to focus and show their real English, without the extra stress that comes from unfamiliar settings or face‑to‑face pressure. PTE Express was designed with this in mind: calm, considered, and supportive, while still being secure and trusted by institutions.

    When the USA is the plan

    If you already know the USA is your destination, things can start to feel more time‑sensitive. Deadlines get closer. Decisions feel heavier. You’re no longer exploring, you’re preparing your next move. PTE Express fits naturally here. It’s a fast, at‑home option for US study, built on the foundations of Pearson that students already trust, and delivered in a way that works for when life is busy and timelines are tight.

    A choice that actually reduces pressure

    The good news is, you don’t have to overthink this. If you want to keep your options open across different countries, there’s a trusted path in PTE Academic that supports that. If you’re focused on studying in the USA and want something fast, familiar and at home, there’s now an option designed for exactly that. No trade‑offs. No feeling like you’re cutting corners. Just choices that match different moments.

    Focus on what really matters

    Studying in the USA is a big step. It’s about independence, growth and starting something new. Your English test should feel like something that supports you quietly in the background, not something that adds more stress to an already intense moment. With PTE Express now live in most countries, including India, students heading to the USA have a calm, trusted at‑home option, built on foundations that have been relied on for years. And sometimes, feeling calm and confident is exactly what helps you do your best.  

  • Man sat outdoors holding a tablet smiling
    Understanding and managing technostress
    By Amy Malloy
    Reading time: 2 minutes

    What is technostress?

    If you find yourself constantly checking social media or feeling pressure to keep up with the latest technology, you may be experiencing technostress. It can show up in different ways, including difficulty focusing on everyday tasks, low motivation or mood, and anxiety around using technology. It even causes some people to avoid digital tools altogether.

    Technostress affects people differently, but at its core is a shared experience, as Chiapetta (2017) defines it: “Technostress is a syndrome that occurs when a person, subjected to information overload and continuous contact with digital devices, develops a state of stress.” This constant exposure to technology has only got more extreme since Chiapetta since defined the syndrome. As a result, technostress is something that more and more people are likely to experience.