How to assess your learners using the GSE Assessment Frameworks

Billie Jago
Billie Jago
A teachet stood in front of a class in front of a board, smiling at his students.
Reading time: 4 minutes

With language learning, assessing both the quality and the quantity of language use is crucial for accurate proficiency evaluation. While evaluating quantity (for example the number of words written or the duration of spoken production) can provide insights into a learner's fluency and engagement in a task, it doesn’t show a full picture of a learner’s language competence. For this, they would also need to be evaluated on the quality of what they produce (such as the appropriateness, accuracy and complexity of language use). The quality also considers factors such as grammatical accuracy, lexical choice, coherence and the ability to convey meaning effectively.

In order to measure the quality of different language skills, you can use the Global Scale of English (GSE) assessment frameworks.

Developed in collaboration with assessment experts, the GSE Assessment Frameworks are intended to be used alongside the GSE Learning Objectives to help you assess the proficiency of your learners.

There are two GSE Assessment Frameworks: one for adults and one for young learners.

What are the GSE Assessment Frameworks?

  • The GSE Assessment Frameworks are intended to be used alongside the GSE Learning Objectives to help teachers assess their learners’ proficiency of all four skills (speaking, listening, reading and writing).
  • The GSE Learning Objectives focus on the things a learner can do, while the GSE Assessment Frameworks focus on how well a learner can do these things.
  • It can help provide you with examples of what proficiencies your learners should be demonstrating.  
  • It can help teachers pinpoint students' specific areas of strength and weakness more accurately, facilitating targeted instruction and personalized learning plans.
  • It can also help to motivate your learners, as their progress is evidenced and they can see a clear path for improvement.

An example of the GSE Assessment Frameworks

This example is from the Adult Assessment Framework for speaking.

As you can see, there are sub-skills within speaking (and for the other three main overarching skills – writing, listening and reading). Within speaking, these are production and fluency, spoken interaction, language range and accuracy.

The GSE range (and corresponding CEFR level) is shown at the top of each column, and there are descriptors that students should ideally demonstrate at that level.

However, it is important to note that students may sit across different ranges, depending on the sub-skill. For example, your student may show evidence of GSE 43-50 production and fluency and spoken interaction, but they may need to improve their language range and accuracy, and therefore sit in a range of GSE 36-42 for these sub-skills.

The GSE assessment frameworks in practice – let’s try

So, how can you use these frameworks as a teacher in your lesson? Let’s look at an example.

Imagine you are teaching a class of adult learners at GSE 43-50 (B1). This week, your class has been working towards writing an essay about living in the city vs the countryside. Your class has just written their final essay and you want to assess what they have produced.

Look at the writing sub-skills in the GSE Assessment Framework for adults. Imagine these are the criteria you are using to assess your students’ writing.

You read one of your student's essays, and in their essay they demonstrate that they can:

  • Express their opinion on the advantages and disadvantages of living in the city vs the countryside
  • Make relevant points which are mostly on-topic
  • Use topic-related language
  • Connect their ideas logically and in a way that flows well
  • Write in clear paragraphs

However, you notice that:

  • They tend to repeat common words, such as city, town, countryside, nice, busy
  • They don’t use punctuation effectively, for example missing commas, long sentences, missing capitalization
  • They have some issues with grammatical structures

Compare the above notes to the GSE Assessment Frameworks. What level is your learner demonstrating in each sub-skill? How could you evidence this using the criteria?

Now, compare your answers to the ideas below.

The points marked in the GSE 43-50 column are evidence that the student is at the expected writing level for their class, based on what you observed in their essay. The points marked in the GSE 36-42 column could be shown to the student to tell them what they need to focus on to improve, based on their essay.

Customizing the GSE assessment frameworks

The GSE Assessment Frameworks are flexible and customizable, and you can use the descriptors for your specific purpose. You can choose the appropriate GSE Assessment Frameworks for your context, and build your own formative assessment based on these.

In the example above, you were only assessing an essay, so you could ignore any contexts that were not applicable to that scenario. For example, writes personal and semi-formal letters and emails relating to everyday matters, or incorporates some relevant details from external sources.

Another benefit of the frameworks is that you can personalize assessments and create tailored learning roadmaps for individual students. Of course, not all learners are the same, so the descriptors allow students to see which sub-skill they need to work on in order to bring their writing (or speaking, listening or reading) up to their expected level. It also helps you as the teacher to understand what sub-skills to focus on in lessons to improve these main skills.

Finally, don’t be afraid to introduce your students to these descriptors or translate them into the learner's first language for lower levels. It is a great way for them to pinpoint and reflect on their strengths and areas for improvement, rather than simply getting a score and not understanding how to get to the next level of confidence and ability.

By incorporating the GSE Assessment Frameworks into your course for formative assessment, you can build students’ confidence and help them better reflect on their learning.

Learn more about the GSE

More blogs from Pearson

  • Students studying together at a table
    What students wish they’d done earlier when planning to study in the USA
    By Abi Fordham
    Reading time: 2 minutes

    If you spend enough time reading student forums, Reddit threads or comment sections about studying in the USA, you begin to notice a pattern.

    There’s plenty of advice about what students should do next. But much less about what they wish they’d done earlier.

    Those reflections usually appear later in the process, after applications have been submitted or deadlines have passed. Often, they come with a sense of hindsight: “I wish I’d known this sooner.”

    For students still early in the process, planning ahead can make everything feel far more manageable – and these tips are here to help.

    Starting earlier helps more than you think

    One of the most common reflections from students is that they waited until something felt urgent.

    Until a deadline appeared. Until a university responded. Until friends started applying.

    By that point, the process often felt rushed and stressful.

    Students who started earlier didn’t necessarily have everything figured out. In many cases, they simply gave themselves more time to think clearly, explore options and make decisions without pressure.

    Starting early doesn’t mean completing everything immediately. It simply means beginning before the process becomes overwhelming.

    Many students don’t realize how much flexibility they have

    Many students assume there is only one way to complete each step of the study abroad process. One test format. One timeline. One fixed path.

    In reality, there are now more flexible options available to students applying to universities in the USA.

    For example, some English language tests can now be taken from home, making it easier for students to fit preparation and testing around school, work or other commitments. This can reduce travel time, scheduling difficulties and unnecessary stress earlier in the application journey.

    Having more flexibility often helps students feel more in control of the process overall.

    Comparing timelines usually creates more stress

    This is something that comes up constantly in student discussions online.

    One student already has an offer. Another has booked their English test. Someone else is still deciding where to apply.

    It’s easy to feel behind, even when you’re not.

    What many students realize later is that study abroad timelines are rarely comparable. Different universities, application requirements, intake dates and personal circumstances all affect how long the process takes.

    The students who felt most confident were usually the ones focused on their own next step rather than someone else’s progress.

    Small steps create momentum

    Another common theme in student reflections is the importance of momentum.

    Not huge achievements. Just consistent progress.

    Researching universities. Booking a test. Submitting one document. Sending one email.

    Small actions help the process feel more realistic and manageable. Over time, they build confidence and make studying abroad feel achievable rather than distant.

    Confidence often comes later than expected

    Many students spend the early stages of the process questioning themselves.

    Am I choosing the right university?
    Am I applying at the right time?
    Am I making the right decisions?

    Later, many reflect that they were more prepared than they initially believed.

    The process itself teaches students how to make decisions, adapt to uncertainty and move forward even without having every answer immediately.

    Waiting until you feel completely ready can sometimes unnecessarily delay progress.

    Final thoughts

    Planning to study in the USA is a major decision, and it’s normal for the process to feel uncertain at times. But many students later realise that starting earlier, staying focused on manageable steps and avoiding unnecessary comparison made the experience much easier.

    You do not need to have everything figured out straight away. Often, the most helpful thing is simply beginning.

  • Two women outside studying and smiling
    How to keep students motivated during intensive summer English courses
    By Richard Cleeve
    Reading time: 5 minutes

    Intensive summer English courses can be exciting, fast-paced and highly rewarding for both learners and teachers. Adult learners and teens often arrive motivated and enthusiastic, ready to improve their English skills quickly. However, it can be challenging to maintain student engagement over long study hours during the summer months.

    With warm weather, holidays and distractions competing for students’ attention, educators need effective strategies to keep learners focused, motivated and actively participating throughout the course.

    Here are eight practical ways to motivate students during intensive summer English courses.

    1. Start the course strong

    The first class sets the tone for the entire course. Students form early impressions about the learning environment, classroom expectations and teaching style, so it’s important to begin with energy, structure and clear objectives.

    For teen learners, establish classroom expectations early by creating class rules together or developing a collaborative class contract. This helps build accountability while creating a positive learning environment.

    For adult learners, ensure students leave the first lesson feeling they have already learned something valuable. Icebreakers and communicative activities are important, but learners should also experience meaningful progress from day one.

    A strong start builds trust, confidence and long-term motivation.

    2. Personalize the learning experience

    One of the best ways to improve student engagement in English language learning is through personalization.

    Take time to learn about your students':

    • Interests and hobbies
    • Academic goals
    • Professional ambitions
    • Travel or study plans
    • Preferred learning styles

    Use surveys, discussion activities or learner profiles early in the course to gather information. You can then tailor lessons, projects and speaking tasks to topics students genuinely care about.

    When learners see content connected to their personal lives and future goals, their motivation increases naturally.

  • Man working in office looking at papers
    How the Slate and PTE partnership is streamlining admissions for greater efficiency
    By Alice Bazzi
    Reading time: 4 minutes

    Admissions teams today are under increasing pressure to ensure the application process is done quickly, fairly and at scale, without compromising integrity or student experience. As international applicant volumes increase and digital processes become the norm, efficiency across admissions workflows has never been more critical. 

    That is why the recent partnership between Slate and PTE aims to simplify the process of receiving, reviewing and trusting English language test results. 

    A shared focus on admissions efficiency 

    Slate is widely used by higher education institutions across the United States to manage the full student lifecycle, from initial inquiry through enrollment. Admissions teams rely on Slate to centralize data, reduce manual processes and support informed decision-making at speed.

    Through the Slate and PTE partnership, PTE scores are integrated directly into admissions workflows, reducing friction for admissions officers and eliminating unnecessary administrative steps. Rather than navigating multiple systems or manually verifying results, admissions teams can access PTE scores while decisions are already being made.

    Reducing manual work and administrative burden

    One of the biggest challenges admissions teams face is losing time to manual processes, such as downloading score reports, checking authentication, uploading files or reconciling data across platforms.

    By integrating PTE into Slate:

    • English test results are received directly within the admissions platform
    • Manual entry and document handling are reduced
    • Verification becomes simpler and more reliable
    • Processing time per application is shortened

    This directly supports admissions teams who are managing high application volumes with limited resources, enabling them to focus less on administration and more on applicant evaluation. 

    Faster, more confident decision-making

    Speed matters, but confidence matters just as much. Admissions teams need to trust the data they’re working with, especially when making conditional offers or final decisions.

    Having PTE results embedded within Slate allows admissions officers to:

    • Review scores quickly and consistently
    • Make faster decisions without leaving their workflow
    • Reduce delays caused by missing or manually-uploaded documentation
    • Maintain consistency across admissions teams and cycles

    The result is a smoother review experience that supports both operational efficiency and institutional standards.

    A better experience for admissions teams and students

    Streamlined admissions workflows don’t just benefit institutions; they improve the experience for students too.

    When systems work together:

    • Applicants face fewer delays and follow‑ups
    • Admissions communication becomes clearer and more timely
    • Offer turnaround times are reduced
    • Institutions present a more modern, efficient admissions experience

    This joined‑up approach helps institutions remain competitive, responsive and student‑focused,  particularly when engaging international applicants navigating complex admissions requirements. 

    Supporting innovation in admissions operations

    Beyond efficiency gains, the Slate and PTE partnership reflects a broader commitment to innovation in admissions operations.

    By integrating trusted English proficiency data into established institutional workflows, the partnership supports:

    • Scalable admissions processes
    • Greater consistency across decision‑making
    • Reduced operational risk
    • Long‑term efficiency as application volumes grow

    For admissions teams, this means future‑ready systems designed to evolve with changing recruitment and enrolment needs. 

    Streamlining admissions with Slate and PTE

    The partnership between Slate and PTE is built on a shared understanding of what admissions teams need most: clarity, efficiency, and confidence.

    By bringing English test scores directly into admissions workflows, institutions can reduce complexity, streamline operations and deliver faster, more reliable outcomes, all while maintaining the integrity and trust that admissions decisions demand.