Talking technology: Teaching 21st century communication strategies

Ken Beatty
Ken Beatty
A teacher holding a tablet to a young student in a classroom sat at a table
Reading time: 4 minutes

When my son created a web consulting business as a summer job, I offered to have business cards made for him. “Oh Dad,” he said, “Business cards are so 20th century!”

It was an embarrassing reminder that communication norms are constantly changing, as are the technologies we use. Younger generations share contact information on their phones’ social media apps, not with business cards. A similar shift has been the move away from business cards featuring fax numbers. “What’s a fax?” my son might ask.

Fax machines have had a surprisingly long life–the first fax machine was invented in 1843–but they have been largely retired because it’s easier to send images of documents via email attachments.

More recent technologies, such as the 1992 invention of text messages, seem here to stay, but continue to evolve with innovations like emojis, a 1998 innovation whose name combines the Japanese words e (picture) and moji (character). 

The 55/38/7 rule and the three Cs

Changing technologies challenge language teachers who struggle to prepare students with the formats and the strategies they need to be effective in academic, business, and social settings. These challenges start with questions about why we have particular norms around communication. These norms form a culture of communication.

The artist/musician Brian Eno defines culture as what we don’t have to do. We may have to walk, but we don’t have to dance. Dancing, therefore, is culture. Communication is full of cultural practices that we don’t strictly need to do, but which make communication more successful. These include practices based on the 55/38/7 Rule and The Three Cs.

The 55/38/7 rule is often misinterpreted as being about what someone hears when we speak. It actually refers to the insights of University of California professor, Albert Mehrabian, who looked at how our attitudes, feelings, and beliefs influence our trust in what someone says.

Mehrabian suggests words only account for seven percent of a message’s impact; tone of voice makes up 38 percent, and body language–including facial expressions–account for the other 55 percent. The consequence of this for our students is that it’s sometimes not so important what they are saying as how they are saying it.

Another way of looking at this nonverbal communication is in terms of The Three Cs: context, clusters, and congruence

Context is about the environment in which communication takes place, any existing relationship between the speakers, and the roles they have. Imagine how each of these factors change if, for example, you met a surgeon at a party compared to meeting the same surgeon in an operating theater where you are about to have your head sawn open.

Clusters are the sets of body language expressions that together make up a message; smiling while walking toward someone is far different than smiling while carefully backing away.

Congruence refers to how body language matches–or doesn’t match–a speaker’s words. People saying, “Of course! It’s possible!” while unconsciously shaking their heads from side to side are perhaps being less than truthful.

How does a culture of communication practices translate to new technologies? Mobile phone texts, just like 19th-century telegraph messages before them, need to be precise in conveying their meaning.

In virtual meetings (on Teams and Google Hangouts, for example), students need to understand that tone of voice, facial expressions, and body language may be more important than the words they share.

Politeness as one constant

An additional key concern in virtual meetings is politeness. Once, in preparation for a new textbook, I was involved in soliciting topics of interest to university teachers. I was surprised that several teachers identified the need to teach politeness. The teachers pointed out that the brevity of social media meant that students were often unwittingly rude in their requests (typical email: “Where’s my grade!”). Moreover, such abruptness was crossing over to their in-person interactions.

Politeness includes civility, getting along with others, as well as deference, showing respect to those who may have earned it through age, education, and achievement. But politeness is also related to strategies around persuasion and how to listen actively, engage with other speakers by clarifying and elaborating points and ask a range of question types. Online or in person, if students cannot interrupt politely or know when it is better to listen, whatever they have to say will be lost in the court of bad opinion.

This is particularly important in preparation for academic and business contexts where students need to interact in groups, such as seminar settings and business meetings. Within these, it’s necessary for students to be able to take on a variety of roles, including leadership, taking notes, and playing devil’s advocate to challenge what a group thinks.

Engaging students with project work

Role-play can help raise awareness of these strategies among students, but it’s not enough to just take on a variety of roles found in common academic and business exchanges; students need to be able to reflect after each role-play session and infer what strategies are successful.

Technology-based projects can also help students engage in a range of communication strategies. For example, a Pearson series, StartUp, embraces technology in each unit by sprinkling various text messages and web-based research tasks. There are also multimedia projects where students use their phones to collect images or video and share the results in presentations that develop their critical thinking.

For example:

Make your own video

Step 1 Choose a favorite restaurant or meal.

Step 2 Make a 30-second video. Talk about the meal. Describe what you eat and drink. Explain why you like it.

Step 3 Share your video. Answer questions and get feedback.

This simple project subconsciously reinforces the unit’s vocabulary and grammar. It also allows students to personalize the project based on things that they need to talk about in daily life–their local foods in this case. This means that each student’s presentation is unique. Unlike with essay assignments, students tend to work hard to craft several versions until they are satisfied because they know their work will be seen by other students and that they will be asked questions that only they can answer.

All this forces students to consider speaking strategies, as well as strategies for appropriate facial expressions and body language. Similarly, they have to use active listening strategies when listening to others’ presentations while asking questions. As technology continues to evolve, teachers need to integrate new applications into their teaching so students learn how to communicate with the tools they have at their disposal.

More blogs from Pearson

  • A woman sat at a table contemplating
    How can I learn to think in a new language?
    By Charlotte Guest
    Reading time: 4 minutes

    If you are learning a language, you may understand many words but still translate everything in your head. Thinking in a new language means you understand and form ideas directly in that language, without relying on your first language. Most learners move from “understanding nothing” to “understanding more than they speak”, then progressing to simple conversations, and finally thinking naturally in the language. This shift takes practice, but it is possible for every learner – especially if you follow these tips. 

    Build a strong base with core vocabulary and grammar

    When learning a language, you do not need thousands of words at the start. You need the right words.

    Focus on 300–500 high-frequency words – the most common words in a language – and basic grammar. These are words that appear in most daily conversations and texts, and learning them helps you speak and understand basic sentences quickly. With these core words, you can:

    • Talk about your daily life
    • Ask simple questions
    • Share opinions
    • Describe past and future plans

    Short daily lessons (even 15 minutes) are very effective. Combine vocabulary, grammar, listening and speaking in a clear order. A strong base makes it much easier to start thinking in the language.

  • Teacher and students discussing over a laptop
    Gamification techniques that boost student participation
    By Charlotte Guest
    Reading time: 6 minutes

    Why do students willingly spend hours trying to beat a game level, but struggle to spend ten minutes revising vocabulary? The difference is design. Gamification in education takes the design principles that make games so compelling – clear goals, visible progress, achievable challenges and immediate feedback – and applies them to everyday learning tasks. 

    Why gamification works in education

    Game-design elements – such as points, badges, leaderboards, levels, progress indicators, instant feedback and choice – increase participation and motivation. When students can see their progress, earn recognition and understand exactly what they’re working toward, tasks feel purposeful and effort feels rewarded. When carefully integrated into a learning management system (LMS), gamification turns every action, whether it’s a quiz, discussion or assignment, into an opportunity for quick feedback and visible progress.

    74% of teachers now use digital game-based learning tools, and the worldwide market is expanding at approximately 28% annually through 2030. This highlights how important it is to have platforms that include badges, leaderboards, adaptive tests and analytics to help students and teachers.

    Points and rewards systems

    Points and rewards are quantifiable tokens granted for desired behaviours (for example, submitting work, collaborating, mastering skills). They give instant, visible credit that reinforces habits and makes effort trackable across activities. When paired with choice and feedback, they sustain engagement without replacing intrinsic interest.

    In the classroom, students can earn points for things like attending regularly, submitting work on time, taking part in small quizzes or posting in forums. This gives quick feedback to show student effort and participation. Studies show that gamification can boost motivation to learn by up to 83%. However, it’s important to balance external rewards with chances for choice and reflection, because too much focus on rewards can reduce the natural desire to learn over time.

  • Woman uses AI on computer
    Why grammar still matters in a world of AI
    By Hannah Lawrence
    Reading time: 7 minutes

    Given that AI can already write emails for us, generate reports and meeting summaries, do we really still need grammar skills? Surely we can just sit back, relax and leave our writing tasks to the machines?

    Don’t be fooled. AI is certainly revolutionizing our productivity and our work processes, but human oversight of AI is still essential – and grammar is fundamental to that oversight. In the same way that calculators didn’t eliminate the need for numeracy and spellcheck didn’t eliminate the need for spelling knowledge, AI doesn’t eliminate the need for language awareness.