How teachers can use the GSE for professional development

Fajarudin Akbar
Fajarudin Akbar
A teacher helping a teenage student working at her desk in a library
Reading time: 4.5 minutes

As English teachers, we’re usually the ones helping others grow. We guide learners through challenges, celebrate their progress and push them to reach new heights. But what about our own growth? How do we, as educators, continue to develop and refine our practice?

The Global Scale of English (GSE) is often seen as a tool for assessing students. However, in my experience, it can also be a powerful guide for teachers who want to become more intentional, reflective, and confident in their teaching. Here's how the GSE has helped me in my own journey as an English teacher and how it can support yours too.

About the GSE

The GSE is a proficiency scale developed by Pearson. It measures English ability across four skills – listening, speaking, reading and writing – on a scale from 10 to 90. It’s aligned with the CEFR but offers more detailed learning objectives, which can be incredibly useful in diverse teaching contexts.

I first encountered the GSE while exploring ways to better personalize learning objectives in my Business English classes. As a teacher in a non-formal education setting in Indonesia, I often work with students who don’t fit neatly into one CEFR level. I needed something more precise, more flexible, and more connected to real classroom practice. That’s when the GSE became a turning point.

Reflecting on our teaching practice

The GSE helped me pause and reflect. I started reading through the learning objectives and asking myself important questions. Were my lessons really aligned with what learners at this level needed? Was I challenging them just enough or too much?

By using the GSE as a mirror, I began to see areas where I could improve. For example, I realized that, although I was confident teaching speaking skills, I wasn’t always giving enough attention to writing development. The GSE didn’t judge me. It simply showed me where I could grow.

Planning with purpose

One of the best things about the GSE is that it brings clarity to lesson planning. Instead of guessing whether an activity is suitable for a student’s level, I now check the GSE objectives. If I know a learner is at GSE 50 in speaking, I can design a role-play that matches that level of complexity. If another learner is at GSE 60, I can challenge them with more open-ended tasks.

Planning becomes easier and more purposeful. I don’t just create lessons, I design learning experiences that truly meet students where they are.

Collaborating with other teachers

The GSE has also become a shared language for collaboration. When I run workshops or peer mentoring sessions, I often invite teachers to explore the GSE Toolkit together. We look at learning objectives, discuss how they apply to our learners, and brainstorm ways to adapt materials.

These sessions are not just about theory: they’re energizing. Teachers leave with new ideas, renewed motivation and a clearer sense of how to bring their teaching to the next level.

Getting started with the GSE

If you’re curious about how to start using the GSE for your own growth, here are a few simple steps:

  • Visit the GSE Teacher Toolkit and explore the learning objectives for the skills and levels you teach.
  • Choose one or two objectives that resonate with you and reflect on whether your current lessons address them.
  • Try adapting a familiar activity to better align with a specific GSE range.
  • Use the GSE when planning peer observations or professional learning communities. It gives your discussions a clear focus.

Case study from my classroom

I once had a private Business English student preparing for a job interview. Her speaking skills were solid – around GSE 55 – but her writing was more limited, probably around GSE 45. Instead of giving her the same tasks across both skills, I personalized the lesson.

For speaking, we practiced mock interviews using complex questions. For writing, I supported her with guided sentence frames for email writing. By targeting her actual levels, not just a general CEFR level, she improved faster and felt more confident.

That experience reminded me that when we teach with clarity, learners respond with progress.

Challenges and solutions

Of course, using the GSE can feel overwhelming at first. There are many descriptors, and it can take time to get familiar with the scale. My advice is to start small: focus on one skill or one level. Also, use the Toolkit as a companion, not a checklist.

Another challenge is integrating the GSE into existing materials, and this is where technology can help. I often use AI tools like ChatGPT to adjust or rewrite tasks so they better match specific GSE levels. This saves time and makes differentiation easier.

Teachers deserve development too

Teaching is a lifelong journey. The GSE doesn’t just support our students, it also supports us. It helps us reflect, plan, and collaborate more meaningfully. Most of all, it reminds us that our growth as teachers is just as important as the progress of our learners.

If you’re looking for a simple, practical, and inspiring way to guide your professional development, give the GSE a try. It helped me grow, and I believe it can help you too.

Additional resources

Read our blog posts 'Improving professional development with 'Teaching with the GSE' and 'GSE Teacher Toolkit: Teaching mixed ability classes'. 

Learn about the GSE

About the author

Fajarudin Akbar is an English teacher, a teachers' community facilitator, and an educational technology practitioner based in Indonesia. He has a passion for continuous professional development, global education, and Open Educational Resources. Fajar helps students and teachers unlock their potential by making learning more personalized, practical, and purposeful.

More blogs from Pearson

  • Students sat at a table with microphones talking
    Building fluent, confident speakers: better ways to assess speaking
    By Charlotte Guest
    Reading time: 6 minutes

    Why traditional speaking assessments can make students feel stressed

    Traditional speaking tests often feel high-stakes and performative. Students are asked to respond on demand, usually in front of a teacher or peers, with little room for hesitation or self-correction. This setup can make it harder for students to show what they can really do because:

    • Time pressure shifts focus from communicating meaning to avoiding mistakes
    • Teacher-centered evaluation can feel judgmental rather than supportive
    • One-off testing may not capture a learner's true abilitiy, especially if they're nervous. 

    When people feel anxious, it often affects their fluency. They find it harder to think so they pause more, forget words and feel less confident. As a result, assessments may reflect how comfortable someone feels under pressure, rather than how effectively they can communicate.

    Key components of speaking fluency to evaluate

    Fluency isn't just about talking fast. It involves several clear signs.

  • People studying in a classroom with one holding her hand up
    How to teach business English to beginner learners
    By Margaret O'Keeffe
    Reading time: 4 minutes

    Teaching business English to beginners can feel challenging, especially when learners have limited vocabulary and confidence. However, with the right structure and focus, you can help students build practical workplace communication skills step by step.

    Focus on high-frequency workplace vocabulary

    For beginners learners, communication matters more than complexity. Teaching commonly-used workplace vocabulary allows students to express basic ideas quickly and clearly.

    Focus on:

    • Everyday work routines (emails, meetings, schedules)
    • Common verb–noun combinations (for example, “make a call,” “solve a problem”)
    • Simple functional phrases for greetings and offers

    This focus on high-frequency language helps learners retain and reuse it more easily.

    Introduce vocabulary in manageable, meaningful ways

    Vocabulary learning becomes more effective when it is limited and contextualized. Instead of overwhelming students, introduce a small number of new words per lesson and place them in realistic scenarios.

    For example:

    • Phone conversations
    • Short emails or messages
    • Daily task lists

    Memory improves when learners interact with words actively. Matching exercises, sentence-building and personalization tasks all strengthen recall because they require learners to process meaning rather than just memorize.

  • Two young girls fistbumping eachother in celebration
    Debunking myths about neurodivergence and language learning
    By Charlotte Guest
    Reading time: 5 minutes

    Can neurodivergent learners really learn a new language?

    Neurodivergent people can learn new languages successfully. Often, what seems like an inability is actually due to a mismatch between traditional teaching methods and how different brains process information.

    Research across ADHD, autism and dyslexia consistently shows that language learning is not only possible but can offer cognitive, social and even emotional benefits. The key variable isn’t capacity, it’s approach.

    Common myths about ADHD, autism and dyslexia in language learning

    Myth 1: “People with ADHD can’t focus enough to learn a language”

    Fact: ADHD brains often thrive with novelty, variety and stimulation,  all of which language learning naturally provides.

    While research on ADHD and language learning is still emerging, scholars highlight that the field is under-researched, not evidence of inability. This gap reinforces that perceived difficulties are often due to teaching methods rather than learner capacity. Traditional methods (long grammar drills, passive memorization) can fail ADHD learners. But when learning includes:

    • Short, varied activities
    • Speaking and interaction
    • Gamified tools
    • Real-world usage

    Attention often improves, not worsens.

    Reframe: It’s not a focus deficit, it’s a method mismatch.

    Myth 2: “Dyslexia makes learning another language too difficult”

    Fact: Dyslexia affects reading and decoding,  not intelligence or the ability to acquire language.

    In fact, many dyslexic learners:

    • Excel in spoken language skills
    • Develop strong pattern recognition
    • Benefit from multisensory input (audio + visual + movement)

    Difficulties usually arise when teaching is overly text-heavy.

    Reframe: Dyslexia changes how language is learned, not whether it can be learned.

    Myth 3: “Autistic learners shouldn’t be pushed into bilingualism”

    Fact: There is no evidence that learning multiple languages harms autistic individuals. Reviews have shown that bilingualism does not have negative effects on autistic children, despite long-standing misconceptions among professionals. In many cases, it can:

    • Support communication flexibility
    • Enhance social connection (especially in multilingual families)
    • Strengthen cognitive processing

    The outdated belief that bilingualism causes confusion has been widely debunked. More recent reviews also highlight cognitive, social and identity-related benefits of bilingualism in autism, challenging deficit-based assumptions. 

    Reframe: Language learning can expand communication,  not limit it.

    Myth 4: “Neurodivergent learners just need more discipline”

    Fact: What looks like “lack of effort” is often cognitive overload.

    Neurodivergent learners may struggle when:

    • Instructions are unclear
    • Tasks rely on one learning modality
    • Pacing is rigid
    • Working memory is overloaded

    Educational research shows that students are very different from each other, and teaching should change to fit those differences.

    Reframe: The issue isn’t motivation,  it’s accessibility.

    Why traditional teaching methods don’t work for every brain

    Most language classrooms still rely on:

    • Heavy text-based instruction
    • One-size-fits-all pacing
    • Passive memorization
    • Limited sensory engagement

    These approaches conflict with what we know about different ways of learning (learner modalities),  the idea that people process information differently (visual, auditory, kinesthetic, etc.).

    The modality principle of multimedia learning shows that people learn better when information is presented through multiple channels (e.g., visuals + audio instead of text alone). This is especially important for neurodivergent learners.

    Bottom line: When teaching adapts to the learner, outcomes improve dramatically.

    How educators and parents can support diverse learners

    Start with this principle: the learner is not the problem; the system might be.

    For educators:

    • Offer multiple ways to engage with content
    • Design activities that include speaking, listening, and movement
    • Avoid equating speed with ability
    • Normalize different learning paths

    For parents:

    • Focus on encouragement, not pressure
    • Choose programs that emphasize communication, not rote memorization
    • Advocate for inclusive teaching approaches in schools