How to assess your learners using the GSE Assessment Frameworks

Billie Jago
Billie Jago
A teachet stood in front of a class in front of a board, smiling at his students.
Reading time: 4 minutes

With language learning, assessing both the quality and the quantity of language use is crucial for accurate proficiency evaluation. While evaluating quantity (for example the number of words written or the duration of spoken production) can provide insights into a learner's fluency and engagement in a task, it doesn’t show a full picture of a learner’s language competence. For this, they would also need to be evaluated on the quality of what they produce (such as the appropriateness, accuracy and complexity of language use). The quality also considers factors such as grammatical accuracy, lexical choice, coherence and the ability to convey meaning effectively.

In order to measure the quality of different language skills, you can use the Global Scale of English (GSE) assessment frameworks.

Developed in collaboration with assessment experts, the GSE Assessment Frameworks are intended to be used alongside the GSE Learning Objectives to help you assess the proficiency of your learners.

There are two GSE Assessment Frameworks: one for adults and one for young learners.

What are the GSE Assessment Frameworks?

  • The GSE Assessment Frameworks are intended to be used alongside the GSE Learning Objectives to help teachers assess their learners’ proficiency of all four skills (speaking, listening, reading and writing).
  • The GSE Learning Objectives focus on the things a learner can do, while the GSE Assessment Frameworks focus on how well a learner can do these things.
  • It can help provide you with examples of what proficiencies your learners should be demonstrating.  
  • It can help teachers pinpoint students' specific areas of strength and weakness more accurately, facilitating targeted instruction and personalized learning plans.
  • It can also help to motivate your learners, as their progress is evidenced and they can see a clear path for improvement.

An example of the GSE Assessment Frameworks

This example is from the Adult Assessment Framework for speaking.

As you can see, there are sub-skills within speaking (and for the other three main overarching skills – writing, listening and reading). Within speaking, these are production and fluency, spoken interaction, language range and accuracy.

The GSE range (and corresponding CEFR level) is shown at the top of each column, and there are descriptors that students should ideally demonstrate at that level.

However, it is important to note that students may sit across different ranges, depending on the sub-skill. For example, your student may show evidence of GSE 43-50 production and fluency and spoken interaction, but they may need to improve their language range and accuracy, and therefore sit in a range of GSE 36-42 for these sub-skills.

The GSE assessment frameworks in practice – let’s try

So, how can you use these frameworks as a teacher in your lesson? Let’s look at an example.

Imagine you are teaching a class of adult learners at GSE 43-50 (B1). This week, your class has been working towards writing an essay about living in the city vs the countryside. Your class has just written their final essay and you want to assess what they have produced.

Look at the writing sub-skills in the GSE Assessment Framework for adults. Imagine these are the criteria you are using to assess your students’ writing.

You read one of your student's essays, and in their essay they demonstrate that they can:

  • Express their opinion on the advantages and disadvantages of living in the city vs the countryside
  • Make relevant points which are mostly on-topic
  • Use topic-related language
  • Connect their ideas logically and in a way that flows well
  • Write in clear paragraphs

However, you notice that:

  • They tend to repeat common words, such as city, town, countryside, nice, busy
  • They don’t use punctuation effectively, for example missing commas, long sentences, missing capitalization
  • They have some issues with grammatical structures

Compare the above notes to the GSE Assessment Frameworks. What level is your learner demonstrating in each sub-skill? How could you evidence this using the criteria?

Now, compare your answers to the ideas below.

The points marked in the GSE 43-50 column are evidence that the student is at the expected writing level for their class, based on what you observed in their essay. The points marked in the GSE 36-42 column could be shown to the student to tell them what they need to focus on to improve, based on their essay.

Customizing the GSE assessment frameworks

The GSE Assessment Frameworks are flexible and customizable, and you can use the descriptors for your specific purpose. You can choose the appropriate GSE Assessment Frameworks for your context, and build your own formative assessment based on these.

In the example above, you were only assessing an essay, so you could ignore any contexts that were not applicable to that scenario. For example, writes personal and semi-formal letters and emails relating to everyday matters, or incorporates some relevant details from external sources.

Another benefit of the frameworks is that you can personalize assessments and create tailored learning roadmaps for individual students. Of course, not all learners are the same, so the descriptors allow students to see which sub-skill they need to work on in order to bring their writing (or speaking, listening or reading) up to their expected level. It also helps you as the teacher to understand what sub-skills to focus on in lessons to improve these main skills.

Finally, don’t be afraid to introduce your students to these descriptors or translate them into the learner's first language for lower levels. It is a great way for them to pinpoint and reflect on their strengths and areas for improvement, rather than simply getting a score and not understanding how to get to the next level of confidence and ability.

By incorporating the GSE Assessment Frameworks into your course for formative assessment, you can build students’ confidence and help them better reflect on their learning.

Learn more about the GSE

More blogs from Pearson

  • University students walking outside on campus
    Elevate your agency’s brand: The PTE Express effect
    By Alice Bazzi
    Reading time: 2 minutes

    In the competitive world of international education, your agency’s reputation is everything. Families trust you to guide them through one of the most important decisions of their children’s lives, and institutions rely on you to send well-prepared students. Every recommendation you make reflects on your brand.

    That’s why it’s important to choose solutions backed by a strong, trusted global reputation. PTE Express, powered by Pearson, is more than an English test; it also helps strengthen your organisation’s credibility in a competitive market.

    Why reputation matters in student recruitment

    Parents and students do not just look for speed and convenience, but also look for efficiency, reliability and integrity. When you recommend a test that universities recognize, you strengthen your own position as a trusted advisor. Furthermore, Pearson assessments are renowned for their quality and transparency: values that resonate with both your customers and your university partners.

    The Pearson advantage: Global recognition and trust

    Pearson is known throughout the education sector for its excellence. With decades of experience in learning and assessments, Pearson has built a reputation that institutions around the world rely on. PTE Express reflects this heritage, offering a secure, reliable English proficiency test designed with admissions in mind.

    When you recommend PTE Express, you are not just offering speed to your students but also offering a test backed by credibility, innovation and a well-trusted brand.

    How PTE Express enhances your brand

    • Professionalism: Recommending a Pearson-backed test signals that your agency prioritizes quality and compliance.
    • Reliability: Institutions know PTE Express scores are authentic and secure, reducing friction in the admissions process.
    • Client confidence: Families feel reassured when they see a globally-recognized name associated with their child’s academic future.

    The alignment positions your agency as a market leader, capable of delivering solutions that meet university standards.

    Security and speed: A winning combination

    PTE Express not only protects integrity through its high-quality security but also accelerates success. Students receive certified results within 48 hours, enabling them to meet tight deadlines without compromising quality.

    For agents, this means fewer delays, smoother workflows and happier clients who will most likely refer more students in the long run. By promoting a test that combines speed with security, you differentiate yourself from competitors.

    Building long-term relationships through trust

    Your reputation grows through consistently supporting your students and earning the trust of families who recommend you to others. As more students progress to your partners, your agency gains wider recognition.

    When you offer a secure and efficient English test, families feel more confident in your process. That trust supports stronger partnerships, repeat business, and referrals.

    Lead with value in every interaction

    When discussing PTE Express with students or institutions, emphasize the benefits of what matters the most:

    • Pearson’s global reputation
    • Secure testing environment that is also flexible for the student
    • Rapid turnaround for results

    Elevate your brand today and find out more about PTE Express here.

  • Teacher talking to girl working on laptop in classroom smiling
    Designed for learning, built for growth: How Big Ben Education Group reimagined short-term programs
    By Emma Currie
    Reading time: 3 minutes

    The challenge: Creating meaningful learning in short-term programs

    In recent years, Big Ben Education Group faced a challenge: how to deliver meaningful learning within short-term programs. Although teachers were passionate and students motivated, their short-term courses lacked a clear academic structure, making learning feel rushed and less impactful. At the same time, they relied heavily on a single market and sought to attract a more diverse, global student mix.

    This raised a critical question: How do you design a short-term program that is both academically meaningful and appealing to a global student audience? That question led to the launch of their first Winter Camp in 2024.

    The turning point: From camp to structured learning experience

    The Winter Camp marked a major shift. For the first time, students from across China, Korea, Japan, Central Asia and the Middle East were brought together. Managing this level of cultural and linguistic diversity required more than enthusiasm; it required structure.

    The school introduced Big English as a core academic framework, giving teachers clarity on learning objectives and ensuring consistency across levels, even within a condensed timeframe.

    But the transformation didn’t stop in the classroom. Excursions were redesigned with clear learning goals, turning them into opportunities for real-world language application. This shift from activities to outcomes required careful planning and strong collaboration between academic and operations teams.  What emerged was something new – a structured, student-centered learning experience that balanced academic rigor with real-world engagement.

  • Students sat at a table with microphones talking
    Building fluent, confident speakers: better ways to assess speaking
    By Charlotte Guest
    Reading time: 6 minutes

    Why traditional speaking assessments can make students feel stressed

    Traditional speaking tests often feel high-stakes and performative. Students are asked to respond on demand, usually in front of a teacher or peers, with little room for hesitation or self-correction. This setup can make it harder for students to show what they can really do because:

    • Time pressure shifts focus from communicating meaning to avoiding mistakes
    • Teacher-centered evaluation can feel judgmental rather than supportive
    • One-off testing may not capture a learner's true abilitiy, especially if they're nervous. 

    When people feel anxious, it often affects their fluency. They find it harder to think so they pause more, forget words and feel less confident. As a result, assessments may reflect how comfortable someone feels under pressure, rather than how effectively they can communicate.

    Key components of speaking fluency to evaluate

    Fluency isn't just about talking fast. It involves several clear signs.