- 1. Critical Thinking & Problem Solving1h 59m
- 2. Sets4h 25m
- 3. Logic4h 33m
- 4. Numeration Systems3h 14m
- 5. The Real Number System3h 5m
- 6. Algebra Review8h 53m
- Evaluating Algebraic Expressions15m
- Simplifying Algebraic Expressions1h 2m
- Linear Equations38m
- Direct & Inverse Variation27m
- Linear Inequalities in One Variable41m
- Quadratic Equations1h 24m
- Rectangular Coordinate System28m
- Intro to Functions and Notation29m
- Domain and Range10m
- Using Intercepts to Graph Lines4m
- Slope and Slope-Intercept Form1h 8m
- Systems of Linear Equations1h 25m
- Systems of Linear Inequalities37m
- 10. Geometry3h 37m
- 11. Voting and Apportionment3h 3m
Pairwise Comparison Method: 동영상 및 연습문제
The Pairwise Comparison Method focuses on comparing every possible pair of candidates in an election. A key idea is that the number of voters is not needed when finding how many candidate pairs there are; only the number of candidates matters. This helps organize election comparisons clearly and efficiently.
If there are \(n\) candidates, the number of pairs of candidates is \(C=\frac{n(n-1)}{2}\) . This formula counts each unique pair once. The same result can also be found by listing the candidates and pairing each candidate with those below it on the list, but the formula is usually quicker as the number of candidates grows.
Pairwise Comparison Method

Determine the number of pairs of candidates in each of the following elections.
An election with 7 candidates and 200 voters.
7
14
21
1400
Determine the number of pairs of candidates in each of the following elections.
An election with 10 candidates and 50 voters.
9 pairs
10 pairs
45 pairs
90 pairs
Pairwise Comparison Method Example 1
학생들이 이 주제에 대해 묻는 질문은 다음과 같습니다:
The Pairwise Comparison Method is a voting system that compares every possible pair of candidates in an election to determine which candidate is preferred over the other. Instead of focusing on the total number of votes each candidate receives, this method looks at how candidates perform head-to-head against each other. This approach helps to organize election results clearly and efficiently, especially when there are multiple candidates. It is useful because it only requires knowing the number of candidates, not the number of voters, to calculate the total number of candidate pairs. This method can reveal the most preferred candidate by analyzing all pairwise matchups.
To calculate the number of candidate pairs in the Pairwise Comparison Method, you use the formula for combinations of candidates taken two at a time. If there are candidates, the number of unique pairs is given by:
This formula counts each pair only once, ensuring no duplicates. It is often faster than listing all pairs, especially as the number of candidates grows.
The Pairwise Comparison Method focuses on the relationships between candidates rather than the total number of voters. The number of candidate pairs depends solely on how many candidates there are, not on how many people vote. This is because the method compares candidates in pairs, and the total pairs are determined by the combination of candidates taken two at a time. Therefore, the number of voters does not affect the calculation of candidate pairs, making the method efficient and straightforward for organizing election comparisons.
The Pairwise Comparison Method offers several advantages in elections. First, it provides a clear and systematic way to compare candidates by evaluating every possible pair, which can reveal the most preferred candidate more accurately than simple vote counts. Second, it handles multiple candidates well, avoiding issues like vote splitting. Third, it does not require knowing the number of voters to calculate candidate pairs, simplifying the process. Lastly, it can identify situations where no candidate is a clear winner, highlighting ties or cycles in preferences, which helps in understanding voter preferences more deeply.
In the Pairwise Comparison Method, ties or cycles occur when candidates beat each other in a circular manner, such as Candidate A beating B, B beating C, and C beating A. This situation is known as a Condorcet cycle. The method identifies these cycles by comparing all pairs, but it does not always provide a straightforward winner in such cases. To resolve this, additional rules or methods, like the Condorcet winner criterion or tie-breaking procedures, are applied. Recognizing these cycles is important because it shows that voter preferences are not always transitive, and the method helps highlight these complexities.