Grammar 101: insider tips and tricks to instantly improve your writing (part 1)

Hannah Lawrence
Hannah Lawrence
woman uses highlighter on book
Reading time: 4 minutes

I've always been fascinated by language and writing: as a child, I wrote newsletters for my classmates and books about my imaginary friends' adventures. That love of words eventually led me into a career as a writer, editor and proofreader. Over my career, I've checked thousands of reports, articles and blogs – and I see the same grammatical mistakes time and time again.

In this blog series, I'll share my favourite tips and tricks to help you remember those tricky grammar rules; whether you're writing for work, to learn or just for fun, these posts will help you improve your English and write with more confidence. Here are the top three grammar rules that people ask me to explain:

1) "Which" or "that"?

2) "Less" or "fewer"? 

3) "Me" or "I"?

Grammar 101
Play
Privacy and cookies

By watching, you agree Pearson can share your viewership data for marketing and analytics for one year, revocable by deleting your cookies.

"Which" or "that"?

We use "that" to introduce a phrase that is essential for fully understanding a sentence. For example, if a colleague asks you to "Join me in the meeting room that has a red door", then this tells us that there is more than one meeting room, but only one has a red door. Without this piece of information, you won't know where to meet your colleague. Phrases like this that hold essential information are called "restrictive clauses".

In comparison, “which” introduces additional information that isn’t essential for understanding the sentence’s meaning. At a different office, if your colleague asks you to "Join me in the meeting room, which has a red door", then this tells us that there is only one meeting room and it happens to have a red door. You don't need to know the colour of the door to understand where to meet. These are called "non-restrictive clauses" and are separated with commas, unlike restrictive clauses.

Also compare: 
"Simon brought his dog that has three legs." (This tells us that Simon has more than one dog and only one of those dogs has three legs.)

"Jada brought her dog, which has three legs." (This tells us that Jada only has one dog. The dog also happens to have three legs.)

"Less" or "fewer"?

"Fewer" is for items that you can count: it means "not as many". 

"Less" is for mass concepts: it means "not as much". 

For example: "I'm trying to have less sugar in my diet. As part of this, I'm going to have fewer spoons of sugar in my coffee."

Another example: "I had less time to work this week, so I did fewer hours on the assignment."

"Time" is uncountable but "hours" are countable. 

"Me" or "I"?

Should you say “Jane, Carlos and I went to the movies?” or “Jane, Carlos and me went to the movies?”

Use "I" when you're doing something – when you are the "subject" of the sentence.

Use "me" when something is being done to you – when you are the "object" of the sentence. 

So, "I" is correct here. Here's the easiest way to know which one to use: remove the other people from the sentence and see if it still makes sense.

Incorrect: “Me went to the movies.”

Correct: “I went to the movies.”

Therefore, it's correct to say: “Jane, Carlos and I went to the movies.” 

That's when you're the subject of the sentence, now compare it to a case when you're the object. 

Incorrect: "Jane invited I to the movies." 

Correct: "Jane invited me to the movies."

Bonus tip: remember to always put other people first. So, in our first example, it is always "Jane, Carlos and I", rather than "I, Jane and Carlos". 

Grammar can be tricky, but it gets easier with practice – and a few insider secrets. Look out for the next post in this series, where we’ll explore more common grammar mistakes and how to avoid them.

More blogs from Pearson

  • Two women sat together in a university classroom talking
    Meeting modern demands in international education
    By Alice Bazzi
    Reading time: 2 minutes

    International education is undergoing a transformation. Today’s students are more mobile, more digitally connected and more determined than ever to seize global opportunities. As expectations evolve, institutions must keep pace – not only in how they teach but in how they assess the readiness of their potential students. 

    One area under increasing pressure is English language proficiency testing, where speed, flexibility, and trust are no longer just an option but are essential. 

    Why Pearson English Express Test meets the modern demands

    The traditional model of language testing, with fixed test centres and long result waiting times, does not reflect the reality of the modern student's journey. Application timelines are tighter, competition is fiercer, and students expect seamless experiences. 

    They want to:

    • Apply, test and receive results quickly 

    • Take the test anywhere and at any time 

    • Have confidence in the fairness and accuracy of the process

    For universities, this means rethinking how they evaluate language skill testing without compromising on quality or security. 

    Introducing the Pearson English Express Test

    The new Pearson English Express Test is designed for the pace and complexity of today’s global admissions. It offers students the freedom to take the test anywhere, any time – whether they are in a remote area or a bustling city. With certified results delivered in just 48 hours, it removes the delays that can stall applications and cause frustration for both students and the admissions team. 

  • A teacher in a classroom with his students raising their hands
    Why do you teach English?
    By Steffanie Zazulak
    Reading time: 3.5 minutes

    Once seen as the pursuit of gap-year students and those looking for a novel way to broaden their horizons, teaching English as a foreign language is now a powerful way to open doors worldwide. And with the benefits of learning English – including allowing you to communicate on a global scale, boosting productivity and building interpersonal skills – it's more important than ever. So, how has this impacted on why and how teachers do the job?

    Sharing the gift

    “When I applied to go and teach English, it was something I wanted to do for me,” recalls Anandi Vara, who taught English in Nepal. “That soon changed. As soon as I observed the students I was teaching embracing, and experiencing the benefits of, English – even at that fledgling stage – it became a reward in itself and sustained me for the rest of the time I was there. The idea that I was partly responsible for setting someone off on the first steps to a life richer in opportunities is a pretty unbeatable motivator, and it spurs you to be as good at the job as you can be.” This supports research released by Pearson, which suggests that it's this "lightbulb moment" that keeps the vast majority of teachers in the job.

    Thomas Stephen, who taught English in the Mexican city of Guadalajara, agrees. “I speak Spanish as well as my native English, so have personally experienced the numerous benefits of bilingualism; a gift I was keen to share with others and witness them appreciating,” explains Thomas. “Being a living, breathing example of what can be achieved is an added dimension in the classroom too,” says Thomas.

    Motivations and expectations

    The benefits of learning English are steadily evolving: are teachers’ motivations for – and methods of – facilitating this learning changing, too?
    “There is certainly the rapidly-aging stereotype of teaching English overseas being viewed as some sort of rite of passage,” says Anandi. “That makes it sound like a rather passive, selfish act on the part of the teacher, which couldn't be further from the truth – especially in this day and age.

    Teaching English is collaborative, because the students are steering you, as much as you’re steering them, towards a highly personalised way of learning. For example, what vocabulary will be useful to them in the hobbies and after-school jobs they do, which may well inform a future career. Students are savvier than ever about why they want to learn and what they want to learn and, as a result, can be very vocal about it, which can only be a good thing! Thinking back to your own aspirations as a student is a very helpful aid in reaching the people you're teaching and understanding their needs.”

    As Thomas highlights, you’ve also got to consider how your younger students ended up in your class to begin with. “It’s worth remembering that many will have been sent to the school you teach at because their parents probably learned English the same way, and many will be reaping the professional (and financial) benefits of having done so, so want the same for their children,” says Thomas. “That puts an added pressure on teachers, of course; as parents are keen to right the wrongs of their own path to learning, as well as trying to optimise their children’s learning to maximise the chances they’ll be able to study overseas and secure a good job in future.”

    Changes to the role

    Sophie Atkinson, who taught English in Sri Lanka, cites the internet as a big factor in sculpting the ambitions of learners. “Although the Internet was relatively scarce where I was teaching, even the briefest exposure to it offered a window into a richer life – not to mention a learning aid that's dominated by the language they're learning,” explains Sophie. “It's having those kinds of insights and adapting your lessons accordingly that are the reasons I wanted to teach. It's a role you can make your own that has selfless rewards that are second to none.”

    Opening doors one lesson at a time

    In the end, teaching English today is far more than a rite of passage; it’s a deliberate, collaborative act of opening doors. The “lightbulb moment” Anandi describes, the lived example Thomas brings to class and the digital windows Sophie navigates all point to the same truth: that learners are more purposeful than ever, and great teachers meet that purpose with empathy, personalization and rigor. You listen, adapt and guide. So every lesson connects to a real-world future.

    Keep centering what matters to your learners, tailoring language to their interests and contexts, partnering with families and making smart use of any tools at hand, even a brief glimpse of the internet. Wherever you teach, from Guadalajara to Nepal to Sri Lanka, each class is another key placed in a learner’s hand. Keep opening doors, one lesson at a time.

  • Teacher in class with students holding Brazil flag
    What’s it like to teach English in Brazil?
    By Steffanie Zazulak
    Reading time: 3 minutes

    Thinking about volunteering to teach English abroad? Caszara Lockett received her TESOL Certificate 4 in her home country, Australia. After teaching at an English summer camp in Barcelona, Spain, she volunteered to teach English in the favelas (slums) of Salvador, Brazil. There she taught everyone from disadvantaged children to middle-aged women, earning their respect with the intermediate Portuguese she had acquired thanks to her abilities in Spanish. Here she reveals five lessons she learnt during her time there.