Build success beyond the classroom: Critical thinking and assessment

Christina Cavage
A group of children stood at a table with their teacher watching her write something down on paper
Okuma zamanı: 4 minutes

There are some common myths related to critical thinking and assessment. Many people believe that it’s impossible to assess critical thinking, especially in classes where language is limited. However, it can be done! Here, the key to success is crafting tasks and rubrics that allow you to separate language skills and cognitive skills. After all, a low language level doesn’t necessarily reflect your student’s ability to think critically.

So, how can we measure how a student knows rather than just what they know?

How to measure critical thinking

Well, we first have to consider two types of assessment—formal and informal. Formal assessments tend to happen at the end of a task, lesson or skill-building activity and usually focus on the work the student has produced. Then, we have informal assessments. Those are the assessments that involve on-the-spot interactions. These types of assessments play a crucial role in measuring critical thinking.

Tips for teaching and assessing critical thinking
Gizlilik ve çerezler

İçeriği izleyerek, Pearson'ın bir yıl boyunca pazarlama ve analiz amacıyla izleyici verilerinizi paylaşabileceğini ve bunu çerezlerinizi silerek geri alabileceğinizi onaylamış olursunuz. 

Formal assessment

There is a common misconception that assessment should only focus on the final work that your students produce. The final ‘product’ is undeniably important and often an ideal measure of linguistic abilities. But the process of producing the final work is where you can see your students’ critical thinking skills in action.

When designing rubrics to measure both language and critical thinking, make sure that you only focus on one at a time—either language or critical thinking. Keeping these different skills in mind will help you to differentiate language skills and critical thinking skills, and evaluate them separately, when it comes to formal assessment.

When measuring language skills, use Bloom’s early or foundational cognitive domains as a model:

If we measure these items, we are really measuring language skills. For example, with a reading activity, we might ask the following questions:

  • Who is the story about?
  • Where does the story take place?
  • What is the main idea of the story?

Can they understand the overall organization and the key vocabulary? These types of questions assess a student’s linguistic ability.

Then, when it comes to critical thinking, the more advanced levels of Bloom’s cognitive domains provide a useful guide:

These types of questions assess a student’s metacognition or critical thinking:

  • Which character is most important to the story?
  • Why?
  • Do you agree or disagree with the character’s actions?
  • Why or why not?

The clear separation of language and critical thinking in assessment will help you to get a measure of each student’s progress in both skills.

Informal assessment

What about those informal assessments? It can be harder to delineate critical thinking and language skills clearly in an on-the-spot assessment.

For example, if you’ve assigned group work, consider keeping a checklist of how students interact with one another. Some checklist items can be:

  • Who made an inference?
  • Who supplied reasoning for another student’s idea?
  • Who made a comparison?
  • Who drew a conclusion?

You can also ask your students to keep a checklist and post these questions on an electronic bulletin board. Like self-assessment, these peer-to-peer assessments can get students reflecting and noticing.

Rubrics can also be useful in informal assessment. Let’s say you’ve asked students to prepare or write an essay. To measure critical thinking, you can look at each student’s ideation process when they’ve been working on their essays:

  • Is a student looking at all possible topics?
  • What are the factors that make a student select the option they did?
  • Are they demonstrating an awareness of other ideas?

The answers to these questions will tell you whether or not your students are thinking critically.

Just like with any other skills, the assessment of critical thinking needs to happen both formally and informally. We need to consider both the process and the final product. And in doing so, we need to carefully design rubrics that differentiate language skills and metacognition.

Learn about our English courses

More blogs from Pearson

  • A young woman studying in a university library with a laptop
    Admissions integrity, built-in: What "secure by design" means for PTE Express
    By Alice Bazzi
    Okuma zamanı: 2 minutes

    Admissions teams rely on English test scores to make high-stakes decisions. If there is any doubt about the integrity of those scores, the entire process can be compromised. Fraudulent results or weak security measures can lead to delays, rejections and reputational damage for institutions and for agents who recommended the test. That is why security is a top priority for Pearson and a defining feature of PTE Express.

    "Secure by design" and what sets PTE Express apart

    PTE Express incorporates multiple layers of protection to guarantee authenticity and fairness:

    • Biometric ID verification: Every test taker's identity is confirmed using advanced biometric checks, reducing risks of impersonation.
    • AI-Enabled monitoring: AI continuously monitors the test session to detect any suspicious behaviour in real time.
    • Fraud detection protocols: Our built-in algorithms flag anomalies and prevent any score manipulation.
    • Remote proctoring: Live and automated proctoring ensures that the test environment remains secure when taken from home.

    These measures work together to create a testing experience that institutions can trust and students can feel confident about.

    Transparency builds confidence

    Security is not just about technology: it is also about communication. Pearson provides clear guidelines on how PTE Express maintains its integrity, giving universities and families peace of mind. When you share these details with your customers, you reinforce your role as a knowledgeable advisor who prioritizes quality and fairness.

    The impact on institutions and agents

    For universities, security means reliability. Admissions officers can confidently accept PTE Express scores, as they know they meet a rigorous standard. For agents, recommending PTE Express strengthens your reputation. You are not just offering speed and convenience: you are also providing a solution backed by global expertise and a commitment to integrity.

    Speed without compromise

    One of the most impressive aspects of PTE Express is its combination of robust security and rapid turnaround. Students can receive certified results within 48 hours, enabling them to meet tight deadlines without sacrificing quality. This balance of speed and security is what makes PTE Express a game-changer for US-bound students and the agents that support them.

    Lead with security in your conversations

    When presenting PTE Express to students or institutional partners, emphasize its security features alongside its convenience. Highlight biometric checks, AI-monitoring and fraud prevention as key differentiators. These elements resonate strongly with universities that prioritize integrity and families who value fairness when making investments. 

  • Business people stood together in a office talking to eachother, one is holding a laptop
    Daily conversation practice tips for busy adults
    By Charlotte Guest
    Okuma zamanı: 4 minutes

    Adults often spend over half the workday on "busywork" plus hours each week on email: long study sessions aren’t realistic. But busy schedules don’t have to stop your progress in English. The solution is short, consistent, contextual speaking practice with fast feedback. With the right system, 10–20 minutes a day is enough to build confidence, fluency and clearer pronunciation. This learner-friendly guide shares a step-by-step, time-efficient approach grounded in microlearning and real-life conversation.

    Core principle:

    Consistent speaking practice improves fluency and pronunciation more than an occasional long study session does, especially when the speaking practice mirrors real situations such as ordering food, joining meetings or interviewing.

    What does this look like in practice?

    • Predictable routines: Same time, short sessions.
    • Real-life contexts: Work, travel, daily interactions.
    • Quick feedback loops: Record → adjust → repeat.

    Use microlearning to turbocharge your sessions: essentially, focus on one skill only for each session, and keep it under 20 minutes. These powerful, focused and – crucially – short sessions fit rest periods and commutes, making daily practice easier to repeat and track. With exercises like quick role-plays, mini-dialogues and brief listening-then-speaking bursts, practice can be fun and energizing too. Follow our five practice tips and make learning work for your lifestyle.

  • A group of students at a table talking to their teacher
    Strategies for teaching large language classes effectively
    By Charlotte Guest
    Okuma zamanı: 5 minutes

    Teaching large language classes can feel overwhelming, but research and practice consistently show that scale is a design challenge, not an impossible challenge. With intentional course structure, active learning routines and the right technology, instructors can create engaging, rigorous and humane learning environments even in high-enrolment contexts. The strategies below focus on what works at scale.

    Challenges of large language classes

    A “large class” has no universal definition. In the UK it may begin around 25–30 students; in the U.S., 35+; in many developing contexts, 60 or more. Regardless of the threshold, size amplifies common teaching challenges: