What evidence did Watson and Crick have at their disposal in 1953? What was their approach in arriving at the structure of DNA?

Verified step by step guidance

1. Understand the historical context: Watson and Crick worked in 1953 when the structure of DNA was unknown, but several key pieces of experimental evidence were already available.
2. Identify the main evidence they used: They had access to X-ray diffraction images of DNA, particularly the famous Photo 51 taken by Rosalind Franklin, which suggested a helical structure.
3. Consider Chargaff's rules: They knew from Erwin Chargaff's findings that the amount of adenine (A) equals thymine (T), and the amount of guanine (G) equals cytosine (C), indicating base pairing.
4. Recognize their approach: Watson and Crick used model building, combining the chemical knowledge of nucleotide components and the physical constraints suggested by the X-ray data to propose a double helix structure.
5. Summarize their reasoning: They integrated experimental data (X-ray diffraction and base composition) with chemical principles to deduce that DNA consists of two antiparallel strands forming a double helix with complementary base pairing.

Key Concepts

X-ray Crystallography

X-ray crystallography is a technique used to determine the three-dimensional structure of molecules by analyzing the pattern of X-rays diffracted through crystallized samples. Rosalind Franklin's X-ray diffraction images of DNA, especially Photo 51, provided critical evidence about the helical structure and dimensions of DNA that guided Watson and Crick.

Base Pairing and Complementarity

Base pairing refers to the specific hydrogen bonding between nucleotide bases: adenine pairs with thymine, and guanine pairs with cytosine. Watson and Crick used Chargaff's rules, which showed equal amounts of A and T and equal amounts of G and C, to propose complementary base pairs that explained DNA's uniform width and replication mechanism.

Model Building Approach

Watson and Crick used a model-building approach, assembling physical models of DNA components to test structural hypotheses. By integrating experimental data and chemical knowledge, they iteratively refined their model to fit the known constraints, ultimately proposing the double helix structure that explained DNA's properties.