Skip to main content
Pearson+ LogoPearson+ Logo
Ch. 22 - Applications of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology
Klug - Concepts of Genetics  12th Edition
Klug12th EditionConcepts of Genetics ISBN: 9780135564776Not the one you use?Change textbook
Chapter 22, Problem 4a

One of the major causes of sickness, death, and economic loss in the cattle industry is Mannheimia haemolytica, which causes bovine pasteurellosis, or shipping fever. Noninvasive delivery of a vaccine using transgenic plants expressing immunogens would reduce labor costs and trauma to livestock. An early step toward developing an edible vaccine is to determine whether an injected version of an antigen (usually a derivative of the pathogen) is capable of stimulating the development of antibodies in a test organism. The following table assesses the ability of a transgenic portion of a toxin (Lkt) of M. haemolytica to stimulate development of specific antibodies in rabbits.
Table showing that injections of Lkt50 extracts induce antibody production, while mock injections do not.
What general conclusion can you draw from the data?

Verified step by step guidance
1
Step 1: Begin by analyzing the table provided in the problem. The table compares antibody production in rabbits after injection with different forms of the immunogen (Lkt50) and a mock injection. Note the '+' and '-' symbols indicating the presence or absence of antibody production.
Step 2: Understand the significance of Lkt50. It is a smaller derivative of the toxin Lkt from Mannheimia haemolytica, modified to lack hydrophobic regions, and is capable of neutralizing at least 50% of the toxicity of Lkt. This modification makes it a candidate for testing as an immunogen.
Step 3: Compare the results of the injections. Both the saline extract and column extract of Lkt50 stimulate antibody production (indicated by '+'), while the mock injection does not (indicated by '-'). This suggests that the Lkt50 derivative is immunogenic and capable of eliciting an immune response.
Step 4: Consider the implications of the data. The ability of Lkt50 to stimulate antibody production in rabbits supports its potential as a component of an edible vaccine. This is an important step in developing a noninvasive vaccine delivery system using transgenic plants.
Step 5: Formulate the general conclusion. The data indicates that the transgenic portion of the toxin (Lkt50) is effective in stimulating the development of specific antibodies in rabbits, which is a promising result for vaccine development against bovine pasteurellosis.

Verified video answer for a similar problem:

This video solution was recommended by our tutors as helpful for the problem above.
Video duration:
2m
Was this helpful?

Key Concepts

Here are the essential concepts you must grasp in order to answer the question correctly.

Antibody Production

Antibody production is a crucial aspect of the immune response, where the body generates specific proteins (antibodies) to identify and neutralize pathogens. In the context of vaccines, the goal is to stimulate this response through the introduction of antigens, which are components of the pathogen. The effectiveness of an antigen in eliciting an antibody response can be assessed by measuring the levels of antibodies in the serum after immunization.
Recommended video:

Transgenic Plants

Transgenic plants are genetically modified organisms that have had foreign genes inserted into their genome. This technology allows for the expression of specific proteins, such as immunogens from pathogens, in plant tissues. The use of transgenic plants for vaccine production offers a non-invasive method to deliver vaccines, potentially reducing costs and improving animal welfare by eliminating the need for injections.
Recommended video:
Guided course
02:56
Plant Gamete Terminology

Immunogenicity

Immunogenicity refers to the ability of a substance, such as an antigen, to provoke an immune response. In vaccine development, it is essential to determine whether a particular antigen can stimulate the production of antibodies. The data presented in the question indicates that the Lkt50 extracts are capable of inducing antibody production, suggesting their potential as effective immunogens in vaccine formulations against Mannheimia haemolytica.
Related Practice
Textbook Question

From GWAS, how do we know which genes are associated with a particular genetic disorder?

430
views
1
rank
Textbook Question

Write a short essay that summarizes the impacts that genomic applications are having on society and discuss which of the ethical issues presented by these applications is the most daunting to society.

467
views
Textbook Question

Why are most recombinant human proteins produced in animal or plant hosts instead of bacterial host cells?

584
views
Textbook Question

One of the major causes of sickness, death, and economic loss in the cattle industry is Mannheimia haemolytica, which causes bovine pasteurellosis, or shipping fever. Noninvasive delivery of a vaccine using transgenic plants expressing immunogens would reduce labor costs and trauma to livestock. An early step toward developing an edible vaccine is to determine whether an injected version of an antigen (usually a derivative of the pathogen) is capable of stimulating the development of antibodies in a test organism. The following table assesses the ability of a transgenic portion of a toxin (Lkt) of M. haemolytica to stimulate development of specific antibodies in rabbits.

With regards to development of a usable edible vaccine, what work remains to be done?

478
views
Textbook Question

Sequencing the human genome, the development of microarray technology, and personal genomics promise to improve our understanding of normal and abnormal cell behavior. How are these approaches dramatically changing our understanding and treatment of complex diseases such as cancer?

723
views
Textbook Question

A couple with European ancestry seeks genetic counseling before having children because of a history of cystic fibrosis (CF) in the husband's family. ASO testing for CF reveals that the husband is heterozygous for the Δ508 mutation and that the wife is heterozygous for the R117 mutation. You are the couple's genetic counselor. When consulting with you, they express their conviction that they are not at risk for having an affected child because they each carry different mutations and cannot have a child who is homozygous for either mutation. What would you say to them?

492
views