Skip to main content
Pearson+ LogoPearson+ Logo
Ch. 45 - Animal Movement
Freeman - Biological Science 8th Edition
Freeman8th EditionBiological ScienceISBN: 9780138276263Not the one you use?Change textbook
Chapter 45, Problem 16

In 2023, Tigist Assefa of Ethiopia set a new record with a time of 2 hours, 11 minutes, and 53 seconds. Scientists, trainers, and athletes alike have wondered about the extent to which muscle structure and function contribute to success in athletes such as Assefa. What makes elite distance runners so good? Are their muscles somehow different from those of less successful athletes and non-athletes? Imagine that Tigist Assefa is racing against a bird and a fish, each with the same mass as Assefa. Which organism would have the highest cost of locomotion during the race?

Verified step by step guidance
1
Understand the concept of 'cost of locomotion', which refers to the amount of energy an organism expends to move a given distance. This cost is influenced by factors such as body structure, muscle composition, and the medium (air, water, land) through which the organism moves.
Consider the differences in muscle structure and function among the three competitors: a human (Tigist Assefa), a bird, and a fish. Humans have muscles optimized for endurance and long-distance running on land, birds have muscles adapted for flight which require quick bursts of energy, and fish have muscles suited for swimming with different resistance and buoyancy factors.
Analyze the medium of movement for each organism. Humans run on land where gravity plays a significant role, birds fly in the air which offers less resistance than water but requires energy to stay aloft, and fish swim in water where buoyancy reduces the impact of gravity but movement is met with more resistance.
Compare the efficiency of muscle use in each medium. Running on land generally requires more energy per unit of distance than swimming, due to the lack of buoyancy and continuous impact with the ground. Flying, while efficient over long distances, requires a lot of energy for takeoff and maintaining altitude.
Conclude which organism would likely have the highest cost of locomotion by considering the combined effects of muscle structure, function, and the medium of movement. Typically, organisms moving through air or on land tend to expend more energy compared to those moving in water, due to factors like gravity and resistance.

Verified video answer for a similar problem:

This video solution was recommended by our tutors as helpful for the problem above.
Video duration:
2m
Was this helpful?

Key Concepts

Here are the essential concepts you must grasp in order to answer the question correctly.

Muscle Fiber Types

Muscle fibers are categorized into two main types: slow-twitch (Type I) and fast-twitch (Type II). Slow-twitch fibers are more efficient for endurance activities, as they use oxygen to generate energy and are resistant to fatigue. In contrast, fast-twitch fibers are geared towards short bursts of power and speed but fatigue quickly. Elite distance runners typically have a higher proportion of slow-twitch fibers, which enhances their endurance and performance in long races.
Recommended video:
Guided course
02:40
Muscle Fibers and Sarcomeres

Cost of Locomotion

The cost of locomotion refers to the energy expenditure required for an organism to move over a certain distance. It is influenced by factors such as body mass, muscle efficiency, and the mode of locomotion (running, flying, swimming). In comparing Tigist Assefa with a bird and a fish, the cost of locomotion can vary significantly due to differences in biomechanics and energy use, with each organism adapting its movement to optimize efficiency in its environment.
Recommended video:
Guided course
02:08
Muscle System and Skeleton

Biomechanics of Locomotion

Biomechanics involves the study of the mechanical laws relating to the movement or structure of living organisms. In the context of locomotion, it examines how muscles, tendons, and skeletal structures work together to produce movement. For instance, the running mechanics of a human differ from the flight mechanics of a bird or the swimming mechanics of a fish, affecting their speed, efficiency, and ultimately the cost of locomotion during a race.
Recommended video:
Guided course
02:08
Muscle System and Skeleton
Related Practice
Textbook Question

In 2023, Tigist Assefa of Ethiopia set a new record with a time of 2 hours, 11 minutes, and 53 seconds. Scientists, trainers, and athletes alike have wondered about the extent to which muscle structure and function contribute to success in athletes such as Assefa. What makes elite distance runners so good? Are their muscles somehow different from those of less successful athletes and non-athletes? Predict the effect of training for a marathon on the number of muscle cells in the gastrocnemius. Explain.

179
views
Textbook Question

In 2023, Tigist Assefa of Ethiopia set a new record with a time of 2 hours, 11 minutes, and 53 seconds. Scientists, trainers, and athletes alike have wondered about the extent to which muscle structure and function contribute to success in athletes such as Assefa. What makes elite distance runners so good? Are their muscles somehow different from those of less successful athletes and non-athletes? To discover the relationship between muscle-fiber types and performance, researchers obtained tiny biopsies of the gastrocnemius of 14 elite distance runners, 18 trained but non-elite distance runners, and 19 untrained subjects. They categorized the fiber types as slow or fast. (At the time of the study, intermediate fibers had not been identified as a third type.) Some of their data are shown here (* means 𝑃<0.05; BioSkills 3). What conclusions can you draw from these data?


190
views
Textbook Question

In 2023, Tigist Assefa of Ethiopia set a new record with a time of 2 hours, 11 minutes, and 53 seconds. Scientists, trainers, and athletes alike have wondered about the extent to which muscle structure and function contribute to success in athletes such as Assefa. What makes elite distance runners so good? Are their muscles somehow different from those of less successful athletes and non-athletes? The researchers looked more closely at the data within the group of elite runners. Although the mean proportion of slow fibers was 79 percent in this group, individual values ranged from 27 percent in one runner to 98 percent in another. How does this finding affect your interpretation of the relationship between athletic performance and muscle-fiber types?

162
views