Reasonable Adjustments 2026-2027

View all tags

Welcome to the Functional Skills blog for November 2026. This month, we’re sharing our latest guidance on Reasonable Adjustments and providing guidance on what adjustments can be made. This is an update on our previous 2025/26 blog and to help you support every learner with confidence.

Functional Skills Writing and Scribes

Entry Level

Over the last few years, we have worked closely with providers to find the best solution for the use of scribes, a solution that allows learners to access as many marks as possible. Last year, scribes were allowed if the learners spelt out each word letter by letter. Moving forwards, we will continue to allow learners to spell out each word and gain access to the full range of marks. Alternatively, learners may dictate word by word and lose access to the spelling marks on the extended writing questions.

In addition to this, we would expect letter by letter spelling for the spelling tests on all levels and for the questions about the use of plurals on Entry 2 and Entry 3 assessments.

The Entry Level Scribe Cover Sheet has now been adjusted to reflect this.

Entry Level Functional Skills - Scribe Cover Sheet

Level 1 and 2

For Level 1 and 2 writing, your learners have the same choice: dictating letter by letter or dictating words. If they choose to dictate letter by letter, they will have access to the full remit of marks for Spelling, Punctuation and Grammar (SPaG). If they dictate word by word, they will be moved down a band for SPaG. SPaG is put into three bands. The highest mark they would be able to achieve would be from the middle band as they would not be demonstrating any spelling skills.

Evidencing 25% Extra Time

From September 2025 an application for 25% extra time must be supplemented by samples of evidence for inspection purposes:

  • a sample of internal tests, mock exam papers across relevant subjects showing the application of 25% extra time
  • comments and observations from teaching staff in relevant subjects as to why the candidate needs 25% extra time and how they use the 25% extra time awarded.

Evidence must demonstrate both:

  • the need for 25% extra time; and
  • the student’s normal way of working in timed tasks and assessments.

This has always been required. The 2025-26 JCQ regulations simply make these expectations more explicit, ensuring fairness and consistency across all centres.

Acceptable Forms of Evidence

Colleges do not need to create additional burdensome processes. Evidence should be drawn from naturally occurring work within existing teaching and assessment practice. Examples include:

  • Timed classroom assessments: short tests, past paper extracts or timed written tasks.
  • Mock exam papers (where available).
  • Simple recording methods: e.g. change of pen colour or change of font to show where the extra time was applied.
  • Teacher observations and comments: staff noting how the student uses their extra time in lessons or assessments.

Practical Considerations for Colleges

  • New students in September: Where students arrive without prior documentation, colleges should gather early evidence through short, timed classroom tasks and teacher feedback. Full mock exams are not required.
  • Range of qualifications: Evidence does not need to come from every subject studied. A sample from relevant curriculum areas is sufficient.
  • Tutor workload: Embedding the process into existing practice is key. Evidence can be collected at the point of marking or feedback of existing tests or assessments.
  • Deadlines: For qualifications with October deadlines (e.g. BTECs), colleges should prioritise short, practical evidence gathering. A simple class test, annotated with a note on the application of extra time, is sufficient. Applications can be made after the deadline of 21 October.

Rest Breaks

Samples of work showing the application of supervised rest breaks are not required. Where a candidate has an impairment other than a learning difficulty and 25% extra time is awarded rather than supervised rest breaks, e.g. a medical condition, the need for 25% extra time would be explained that supervised rest breaks were explored, trialled but proved to be ineffective and not appropriate to the student’s needs. This would be supported by teacher feedback.

Examples of Qualifications and the Assessment Evidence Required

Qualification Type

Assessment Evidence Required

Level 1 Functional Skills English and/or Mathematics One piece of assessment evidence.
Level 2 Functional Skills English and/or Mathematics One piece of assessment evidence.
Student moves from Level 1 Functional Skills English and/or Mathematics to Level 2 Functional Skills English and/or Mathematics Updated teacher feedback is not required. Updated assessment evidence is not required.
Student moves from a Level 1 or Level 2 Functional Skills English and/or Mathematics qualification to a GCSE English Language and/or Mathematics qualification Updated teacher feedback is not required but updated assessment evidence is. One piece of assessment evidence relating to the GCSE course which could be a timed classroom assessment or, where available, a mock examination.

Summary

These requirements do not represent a change in processes but rather reinforce what has always been expected: applications for 25% extra time are supported by evidence of need and evidence of the student’s normal way of working.

If you have any questions or concerns about reasonable adjustments, please do not hesitate to get in touch with us here at Pearson.

Filter by tag