Which of the following best reflects how John Green reasoned about information from experts in the context of cognitive psychology?

• A. He dismissed expert opinions entirely, relying only on his own intuition.
• B. He used expert information solely to confirm his pre-existing beliefs, ignoring contradictory evidence.
• C. He accepted expert information without question, assuming all experts are always correct.
• D. He critically evaluated expert opinions, considering both evidence and potential biases before accepting their conclusions.

Answer: (D)

Verified step by step guidance

1. Understand the context of cognitive psychology, which studies how people think, learn, and reason, including how they evaluate information from others.
2. Recognize that effective reasoning about expert information involves critical evaluation rather than blind acceptance or outright dismissal.
3. Identify that John Green's approach involves weighing evidence and considering potential biases, which aligns with the concept of critical thinking in cognitive psychology.
4. Compare the given options to see which one reflects this balanced and analytical approach to expert opinions.
5. Conclude that the best reflection of John Green's reasoning is the option describing critical evaluation of expert opinions, considering both evidence and biases before acceptance.