When conducting a hypothesis test for two population means where the variances are assumed equal but unknown, the pooled t test is the appropriate method. This test is a specific type of two-sample t test that combines the variances from both samples to estimate a common variance, enhancing the accuracy of the test when the assumption of equal variances holds true. The pooled t test follows the same fundamental steps as other hypothesis tests but requires specifying the test type accordingly in Excel’s T.TEST function.
In this context, the null hypothesis (\(H_0\)) states that the two population means are equal, expressed as \(H_0: \mu_1 = \mu_2\), where \(\mu_1\) and \(\mu_2\) represent the average values of the two groups being compared. The alternative hypothesis (\(H_a\)) is that the means are not equal, \(H_a: \mu_1 \neq \mu_2\), indicating a two-tailed test since the direction of difference is not specified.
Using Excel’s T.TEST function, the syntax for a pooled t test requires four inputs: the first dataset, the second dataset, the number indicating the type of test tail (1 for left-tailed, 2 for two-tailed), and the test type code. For a pooled t test, the test type code is 2, which instructs Excel to assume equal variances. This differs from the default two-sample t test for unequal variances, which uses a different code.
The function call looks like this:
\[\text{=T.TEST(array1, array2, tails, type)}\]
where array1 and array2 are the sample data ranges, tails is 2 for a two-tailed test, and type is 2 for the pooled t test.
After calculating the p-value, it is compared to the significance level \(\alpha\) (commonly 0.05). If the p-value is less than \(\alpha\), the null hypothesis is rejected, indicating sufficient evidence to conclude that the population means differ. Conversely, if the p-value is greater than \(\alpha\), there is insufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis, supporting the claim that the means are equal.
For example, if the p-value is 0.003 and \(\alpha = 0.05\), since 0.003 < 0.05, the null hypothesis is rejected. This means there is strong evidence that the average number of cookies in the new packaging differs from that in the old packaging, contradicting the company’s claim of equal averages.
Understanding the pooled t test and its implementation in Excel is essential for accurately comparing two population means when equal variances are assumed. This method streamlines hypothesis testing by leveraging combined variance estimates, providing a robust statistical approach for evaluating claims about population parameters.
