[DATA] Political Affiliation In the Sullivan Statistics Survey, respondents were asked to disclose their political affiliation (Democrat, Independent, Republican) and also answer the question: “Would you be willing to pay higher taxes if the tax revenue went directly toward deficit reduction?” Go to www.pearsonhighered.com/sullivanstats to obtain the data file SullivanSurveyI using the file format of your choice for the version of the text you are using. Create a contingency table and determine whether the results suggest there is an association between political affiliation and willingness to pay higher taxes to directly reduce the federal debt. Use the alpha = 0.05 level of significance.
Table of contents
- 1. Intro to Stats and Collecting Data1h 14m
- 2. Describing Data with Tables and Graphs1h 55m
- 3. Describing Data Numerically2h 5m
- 4. Probability2h 16m
- 5. Binomial Distribution & Discrete Random Variables3h 6m
- 6. Normal Distribution and Continuous Random Variables2h 11m
- 7. Sampling Distributions & Confidence Intervals: Mean3h 23m
- Sampling Distribution of the Sample Mean and Central Limit Theorem19m
- Distribution of Sample Mean - Excel23m
- Introduction to Confidence Intervals15m
- Confidence Intervals for Population Mean1h 18m
- Determining the Minimum Sample Size Required12m
- Finding Probabilities and T Critical Values - Excel28m
- Confidence Intervals for Population Means - Excel25m
- 8. Sampling Distributions & Confidence Intervals: Proportion1h 25m
- 9. Hypothesis Testing for One Sample3h 29m
- 10. Hypothesis Testing for Two Samples4h 50m
- Two Proportions1h 13m
- Two Proportions Hypothesis Test - Excel28m
- Two Means - Unknown, Unequal Variance1h 3m
- Two Means - Unknown Variances Hypothesis Test - Excel12m
- Two Means - Unknown, Equal Variance15m
- Two Means - Unknown, Equal Variances Hypothesis Test - Excel9m
- Two Means - Known Variance12m
- Two Means - Sigma Known Hypothesis Test - Excel21m
- Two Means - Matched Pairs (Dependent Samples)42m
- Matched Pairs Hypothesis Test - Excel12m
- 11. Correlation1h 24m
- 12. Regression1h 50m
- 13. Chi-Square Tests & Goodness of Fit2h 21m
- 14. ANOVA1h 57m
13. Chi-Square Tests & Goodness of Fit
Independence Tests
Struggling with Statistics?
Join thousands of students who trust us to help them ace their exams!Watch the first videoMultiple Choice
In a chi-square test for independence, how does the difference between the expected frequency and the observed frequency affect the value of the chi-square statistic?
A
A larger difference between and increases the chi-square statistic, making it more likely to reject the null hypothesis.
B
A larger difference between and decreases the chi-square statistic, making it less likely to reject the null hypothesis.
C
The difference between and has no effect on the chi-square statistic.
D
A smaller difference between and increases the chi-square statistic.
Verified step by step guidance1
Recall the formula for the chi-square statistic in a test for independence:
\[\chi^2 = \sum \frac{(f_o - f_e)^2}{f_e}\]
where \(f_o\) is the observed frequency and \(f_e\) is the expected frequency for each cell in the contingency table.
Understand that the numerator \((f_o - f_e)^2\) represents the squared difference between observed and expected frequencies. This means that larger differences will increase the value of this term.
Since the chi-square statistic sums these squared differences divided by the expected frequencies, larger differences between \(f_o\) and \(f_e\) will contribute more to the overall chi-square value.
A higher chi-square statistic indicates a greater discrepancy between observed and expected data, which makes it more likely to reject the null hypothesis of independence.
Therefore, the difference between \(f_o\) and \(f_e\) directly affects the chi-square statistic: the larger the difference, the larger the chi-square value, increasing the chance of rejecting the null hypothesis.
Related Videos
Related Practice
Textbook Question
14
views
Independence Tests practice set

