Getting at the Concept Explain why a level of significance of α=0 is not used.
Table of contents
- 1. Intro to Stats and Collecting Data1h 14m
- 2. Describing Data with Tables and Graphs1h 56m
- 3. Describing Data Numerically2h 5m
- 4. Probability2h 16m
- 5. Binomial Distribution & Discrete Random Variables3h 6m
- 6. Normal Distribution and Continuous Random Variables2h 11m
- 7. Sampling Distributions & Confidence Intervals: Mean3h 23m
- Sampling Distribution of the Sample Mean and Central Limit Theorem19m
- Distribution of Sample Mean - ExcelBonus23m
- Introduction to Confidence Intervals15m
- Confidence Intervals for Population Mean1h 18m
- Determining the Minimum Sample Size Required12m
- Finding Probabilities and T Critical Values - ExcelBonus28m
- Confidence Intervals for Population Means - ExcelBonus25m
- 8. Sampling Distributions & Confidence Intervals: Proportion2h 10m
- 9. Hypothesis Testing for One Sample5h 8m
- Steps in Hypothesis Testing1h 6m
- Performing Hypothesis Tests: Means1h 4m
- Hypothesis Testing: Means - ExcelBonus42m
- Performing Hypothesis Tests: Proportions37m
- Hypothesis Testing: Proportions - ExcelBonus27m
- Performing Hypothesis Tests: Variance12m
- Critical Values and Rejection Regions28m
- Link Between Confidence Intervals and Hypothesis Testing12m
- Type I & Type II Errors16m
- 10. Hypothesis Testing for Two Samples5h 37m
- Two Proportions1h 13m
- Two Proportions Hypothesis Test - ExcelBonus28m
- Two Means - Unknown, Unequal Variance1h 3m
- Two Means - Unknown Variances Hypothesis Test - ExcelBonus12m
- Two Means - Unknown, Equal Variance15m
- Two Means - Unknown, Equal Variances Hypothesis Test - ExcelBonus9m
- Two Means - Known Variance12m
- Two Means - Sigma Known Hypothesis Test - ExcelBonus21m
- Two Means - Matched Pairs (Dependent Samples)42m
- Matched Pairs Hypothesis Test - ExcelBonus12m
- Two Variances and F Distribution29m
- Two Variances - Graphing CalculatorBonus16m
- 11. Correlation1h 24m
- 12. Regression3h 33m
- Linear Regression & Least Squares Method26m
- Residuals12m
- Coefficient of Determination12m
- Regression Line Equation and Coefficient of Determination - ExcelBonus8m
- Finding Residuals and Creating Residual Plots - ExcelBonus11m
- Inferences for Slope31m
- Enabling Data Analysis ToolpakBonus1m
- Regression Readout of the Data Analysis Toolpak - ExcelBonus21m
- Prediction Intervals13m
- Prediction Intervals - ExcelBonus19m
- Multiple Regression - ExcelBonus29m
- Quadratic Regression15m
- Quadratic Regression - ExcelBonus10m
- 13. Chi-Square Tests & Goodness of Fit2h 21m
- 14. ANOVA2h 28m
9. Hypothesis Testing for One Sample
Type I & Type II Errors
Multiple Choice
A public health agency claimed last year that the proportion of children vaccinated for measles met their goal of 85%, however, they want to test if the current proportion falls shy of that goal. What are the Type I & Type II Errors? Which is more serious?
A
We conclude that P > 0.85 when actually P = 0.85
We conclude that P = 0.85 when actually P > 0.85
Type I is more serious
B
We conclude that P < 0.85 when actually P = 0.85
We conclude that P = 0.85 when actually P < 0.85
Type I is more serious
C
We conclude that P > 0.85 when actually P = 0.85
We conclude that P = 0.85 when actually P > 0.85
Type II is more serious
D
We conclude that P < 0.85 when actually P = 0.85
We conclude that P = 0.85 when actually P < 0.85
Type II is more serious
0 Comments
Verified step by step guidance1
Step 1: Define the null hypothesis (H_0) and the alternative hypothesis (H_a). Since the agency claimed the proportion of vaccinated children is 85%, the null hypothesis is \(H_0: P = 0.85\). The alternative hypothesis, testing if the current proportion falls short, is \(H_a: P < 0.85\).
Step 2: Understand Type I error: This occurs when we reject the null hypothesis even though it is true. In this context, a Type I error means concluding that the proportion of vaccinated children is less than 0.85 when in fact it is exactly 0.85.
Step 3: Understand Type II error: This happens when we fail to reject the null hypothesis even though the alternative is true. Here, a Type II error means concluding that the proportion is 0.85 when actually it is less than 0.85.
Step 4: Identify the errors in terms of the problem statements: Type I error corresponds to concluding \(P < 0.85\) when actually \(P = 0.85\). Type II error corresponds to concluding \(P = 0.85\) when actually \(P < 0.85\).
Step 5: Consider which error is more serious: Since the agency wants to ensure the vaccination rate does not fall below 85%, failing to detect a drop (Type II error) could have more serious public health consequences. Therefore, Type II error is more serious in this context.
Related Videos
Related Practice
Textbook Question
49
views

