Skip to main content
Pearson+ LogoPearson+ Logo
Start typing, then use the up and down arrows to select an option from the list.


Learn the toughest concepts covered in Physics with step-by-step video tutorials and practice problems by world-class tutors

29. Sources of Magnetic Field

Biot-Savart Law (Calculus)


Biot-Savart Law with Calculus

Play a video:
Was this helpful?
Hey, guys, in this video, we're going to be discussing the general calculus form of the videos of our PLA. All right, let's get to it for any current okay? Contained by some wire. If we want to measure the magnetic field at some position, our vector away. Okay, so we have this figure here above me where we have some arbitrary wire in this case, a curved one with some arbitrary current. I we want to measure the magnetic field here. Okay. What's that going to look like? We'll be use of our law tells us that this is mu not over four pi times that integral of the currents D l cross our vector over our cubes. Okay. We already know what are is the only thing we need to know is what d l is, okay. And D l is a very, very small vector, okay? In the direction of the current. Wherever this current is pointing, I can choose a really tiny, infinitesimally small vector D l in that direction. Okay. And the cross product right here is between that vector D l and the position vector are okay. BeOS of art law. This integral equation reduces to our familiar magnetic field equations. For instance, we have the magnetic field due to a point charge, and we have the magnetic field due to an infant long current carrying wire as just two examples of what the bills of our law reduces to. Okay, let's do an example. Show that the abuse of our law for occurring is the same as the equation above for a point charge. So if instead of having just some large current which is made up of a bunch of streaming electrons, we have a single charge, Q That's moving. And we wanna use bills of our law given to us the general form to find it for a point charge. Okay, the general form is just Muna over four pi integral of I d l cross our vector over are cute. Okay, What we're gonna do here is we're gonna substitute in the definition for current current by definition, is de que DT Okay, so I'll plug that in. This becomes mu not over four pi integral dick You d t d l cross our over are cute. Now there's something that you can do what you learned in calculus called implicit differentiation. Okay, if you treat these infinite testicles D Q d t d l as implicit differentials. Okay, we can reorder them. And we can just say that this is mu not over four pi integral de que d l DT Cross our vector over our cute. Okay, now what d l is is it's a very, very small amount of distance in the direction that the current is moving or in this case, in the direction of the charges moving the rate at which that's increasing in size is just the velocity of the charge. So it becomes you not over for pie. Integral de que the cross our over our cute. Now what we're integrating over is our charge, Dick. There is a single charge here, so the velocity doesn't change for the charge, and neither do these positions. Those positions are just the position that we want to measure the magnetic field in so we can pull all of that out. Simplifying the cross product. This becomes VR. Signed Fada over r cubed. Sorry, I'm missing the four pi integral of Dick. And there's just a single charge. The integral dick is just that charge Q So it becomes Muna over four. Pi que by the way we lose the power of our in the denominator Q v sine theta over r squared. And that is our familiar equation for the bios of art law for a single moving charge. All right, Thanks for watching guys.

Magnetic Field due to Finite Wire

Play a video:
Was this helpful?
Hey, guys, let's do an example. What is the magnetic field at the position shown in the following figure. Do Thio the finite current carrying wire. Okay, we already saw what the magnetic field, due to an infinitely long current carrying wire is now we want to find it due to a finite current carrying wire in this case, a wire of length to a Okay, I centered the Z axis so that the wire extends negative A to the left of the Z axis and positive a to the right of the Z axis. Okay, Now, what Bill Sabarwal tells us is that each chunk of this current carrying wire contributes a very small amount of a very small amount to the magnetic field equals, um, you not over four pi i d l cross our over our cute. That's the very, very small contribution of each piece. De l of this current. So if I were to grab an arbitrary piece of this current, let's say right here, I'm not gonna call it D l. I'm gonna call it the X because it's in the X direction Okay than this is my our vector. The position from my current d l to the point at which we're interested in measuring the magnetic fields. Okay. And what is our are simply whatever we call this distance which I'll call X And this distance the vertical distance which we called our is the square root of X squared plus Z squared. Okay, so let's simplify our DP right here. Okay? I This is gonna be dx okay and said it d l r sine theta because I'm doing the cross product between them over our cubes, we're gonna lose the value of our so it's gonna be Muna over four pi. I signed Fada over the square root of X squared plus Z squared DX. We're not quite done. The reason is, as we're integrating along X as we move from negative a across X all the way over to positive a this angle, right? Your data changes. So we do need to know what sign of data is. We can say, though that sign of data is just the opposite edge, which is easy over the high pot noose are, which is the square root of X squared plus Z squared. Ok, I did make one little typo right here. This is R squared. Are is the square root. So the square cancels the square root. Okay, this is what sign of fate it looks like, though. Okay, so now we can plug in sign of data. I'm gonna minimize myself to give us some room. Mu not over four pi I z over. This is to the power of one. This is to the power of one half. One plus one half is three halves. Okay, the X. Okay, So all we have to do is integrate this over our integration variable X, and that will tell us what the magnetic field strength is at that point. So be is just the integral along X from negative A too positive A of mu, not I over four pi z over x squared plus z squared to the three halves DX. Okay, Now you cannot use u substitution here because the denominator you would use Sorry you in the denominator as x squared plus z squared. But that means you need a next in the numerator. That doesn't work. This is an integral that we've actually seen before when dealing with cool OEMs law. And it uses trig and metric substitution. I'm not gonna do the integral again. I'm just going to show the result. This is something that you can find in your books in the table of integrations. It would be given to you on an exam. Okay, Unless your professor was a sadist and made you solve this from scratch on an exam. Okay, but the solution is just mu not I. Over four pi to a over Z square roots Z squared, plus a squared. That is the solution already plugging in the integration limits. Negative. A and positive A. Okay, so one thing that we could do right here is we could knock a two down, and that would be simplified. Okay, this is the correct answer right here to find the magnetic field at a point z for a finite wire of length to a Now, an interesting question is, does this result match up with the result that we know is true for an infinitely long wire. Okay. Meaning what does the limit as a go to infinity look like? Well, this is just mu, not I over two pi. None of that is involved with the limit. A over Z square root Z squared, plus a squared. The numerator ended a nominator. Both have the same power of a It's a in the numerator and square root of a square in the denominator. So we can't say for sure which wins the numerator or the denominator because they're both growing at the same rate. I need to use a little bit of algebra to manipulate our limit. This becomes you and I over two pi. Nothing changes there, Limit. What I'm going to do is I'm going to factor out this a squared. When I pull it out off the square root, it loses its power, okay, loses its power of two, and it just becomes a So this is a over Z a square roots Z squared over a squared plus one. Okay, that's the factored form. And now, luckily notice we could just lose the power A in the numerator and the denominator. So once again, what's wrong color continuing with this this is mu not I. Over two pi limit as a goes to infinity of one over z Z squared over a squared plus one. Now what happens when it goes to infinity? Well, this is e squared over a squared, so that goes to zero. Zero plus one is just one. So this whole thing is mu not I over two pi z. And that is exactly the equation that we have for a wire that's infinitely long and straight carrying a current I If we wanted to know the magnetic field, the distance z away, right? If we had some wire carrying some current and I wanted to know what was the magnetic field at this point a distance z away, it would be this equation. All right, guys, Thanks for watching.

What is the magnetic field at the center of the following ring of current?