Happy in Your Marriage? The General Social Survey asks questions about one’s happiness in marriage. Is there an association between gender and happiness in marriage? Use the data in the table to determine if gender is associated with happiness in marriage. Treat gender as the explanatory variable.
Table of contents
- 1. Intro to Stats and Collecting Data1h 14m
- 2. Describing Data with Tables and Graphs1h 55m
- 3. Describing Data Numerically2h 5m
- 4. Probability2h 16m
- 5. Binomial Distribution & Discrete Random Variables3h 6m
- 6. Normal Distribution and Continuous Random Variables2h 11m
- 7. Sampling Distributions & Confidence Intervals: Mean3h 23m
- Sampling Distribution of the Sample Mean and Central Limit Theorem19m
- Distribution of Sample Mean - Excel23m
- Introduction to Confidence Intervals15m
- Confidence Intervals for Population Mean1h 18m
- Determining the Minimum Sample Size Required12m
- Finding Probabilities and T Critical Values - Excel28m
- Confidence Intervals for Population Means - Excel25m
- 8. Sampling Distributions & Confidence Intervals: Proportion2h 10m
- 9. Hypothesis Testing for One Sample5h 9m
- Steps in Hypothesis Testing1h 6m
- Performing Hypothesis Tests: Means1h 4m
- Hypothesis Testing: Means - Excel42m
- Performing Hypothesis Tests: Proportions37m
- Hypothesis Testing: Proportions - Excel27m
- Performing Hypothesis Tests: Variance12m
- Critical Values and Rejection Regions28m
- Link Between Confidence Intervals and Hypothesis Testing12m
- Type I & Type II Errors17m
- 10. Hypothesis Testing for Two Samples5h 37m
- Two Proportions1h 13m
- Two Proportions Hypothesis Test - Excel28m
- Two Means - Unknown, Unequal Variance1h 3m
- Two Means - Unknown Variances Hypothesis Test - Excel12m
- Two Means - Unknown, Equal Variance15m
- Two Means - Unknown, Equal Variances Hypothesis Test - Excel9m
- Two Means - Known Variance12m
- Two Means - Sigma Known Hypothesis Test - Excel21m
- Two Means - Matched Pairs (Dependent Samples)42m
- Matched Pairs Hypothesis Test - Excel12m
- Two Variances and F Distribution29m
- Two Variances - Graphing Calculator16m
- 11. Correlation1h 24m
- 12. Regression3h 33m
- Linear Regression & Least Squares Method26m
- Residuals12m
- Coefficient of Determination12m
- Regression Line Equation and Coefficient of Determination - Excel8m
- Finding Residuals and Creating Residual Plots - Excel11m
- Inferences for Slope31m
- Enabling Data Analysis Toolpak1m
- Regression Readout of the Data Analysis Toolpak - Excel21m
- Prediction Intervals13m
- Prediction Intervals - Excel19m
- Multiple Regression - Excel29m
- Quadratic Regression15m
- Quadratic Regression - Excel10m
- 13. Chi-Square Tests & Goodness of Fit2h 21m
- 14. ANOVA1h 57m
13. Chi-Square Tests & Goodness of Fit
Contingency Tables
Problem 12.R.6
Textbook Question
Obligations to Vote and Serve In the General Social Survey, individuals were asked whether civic duty included voting and whether it included serving on a jury. The results of the survey are shown in the table. Is there a difference in the proportion of individuals who feel jury duty is a civic duty and the proportion of individuals who feel voting is a civic duty? Use the α = 0.05 level of significance.

Verified step by step guidance1
Step 1: Define the hypotheses for the test. The null hypothesis (H0) states that there is no difference in the proportion of individuals who feel jury duty is a civic duty and those who feel voting is a civic duty. The alternative hypothesis (H1) states that there is a difference in these proportions.
Step 2: Calculate the sample proportions for each category. For voting, calculate the proportion of individuals who consider voting a duty by dividing the number of 'Duty' responses by the total number of respondents. Similarly, calculate the proportion for jury duty.
Step 3: Use the data from the contingency table to set up a test for the difference between two proportions. The formula for the test statistic (z) is:
\[z = \frac{\hat{p}_1 - \hat{p}_2}{\sqrt{\hat{p}(1-\hat{p})(\frac{1}{n_1} + \frac{1}{n_2})}}\]
where \(\hat{p}_1\) and \(\hat{p}_2\) are the sample proportions, \(n_1\) and \(n_2\) are the sample sizes, and \(\hat{p}\) is the pooled proportion.
Step 4: Calculate the pooled proportion \(\hat{p}\) by combining the successes and total observations from both groups:
\[\hat{p} = \frac{x_1 + x_2}{n_1 + n_2}\]
where \(x_1\) and \(x_2\) are the counts of successes in each group.
Step 5: Compute the test statistic using the formula from Step 3, then compare the calculated z-value to the critical z-value for \(\alpha = 0.05\) (two-tailed test). Based on this comparison, decide whether to reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis.
Verified video answer for a similar problem:This video solution was recommended by our tutors as helpful for the problem above
Video duration:
4mPlay a video:
Was this helpful?
Key Concepts
Here are the essential concepts you must grasp in order to answer the question correctly.
Hypothesis Testing for Difference in Proportions
This concept involves comparing two population proportions to determine if there is a statistically significant difference between them. The null hypothesis typically states that the proportions are equal, while the alternative suggests a difference. Using sample data, a test statistic is calculated and compared to a critical value or p-value to decide whether to reject the null hypothesis at a given significance level (α).
Recommended video:
Guided course
Difference in Proportions: Hypothesis Tests
Contingency Table and Joint Probability
A contingency table displays the frequency distribution of variables and helps analyze the relationship between categorical variables. In this question, the table shows counts of individuals who consider voting and jury duty as civic duties. Understanding how to interpret these counts and calculate proportions or joint probabilities is essential for conducting the hypothesis test.
Recommended video:
Introduction to Contingency Tables
Significance Level (α) and Decision Rule
The significance level, α, is the threshold for rejecting the null hypothesis, commonly set at 0.05. It represents the probability of making a Type I error—incorrectly rejecting a true null hypothesis. The decision rule compares the p-value from the test to α; if p-value ≤ α, reject the null hypothesis, indicating a significant difference in proportions.
Recommended video:
Probability of Non-Mutually Exclusive Events Example
Watch next
Master Contingency Tables & Expected Frequencies with a bite sized video explanation from Patrick
Start learningRelated Videos
Related Practice
Textbook Question
8
views
