Skip to main content
Ch. 11 - Goodness-of-Fit and Contingency Tables
Triola - Elementary Statistics 14th Edition
Triola14th EditionElementary StatisticsISBN: 9780137366446Not the one you use?Change textbook
Chapter 11, Problem 11.1.8

In Exercises 5–20, conduct the hypothesis test and provide the test statistic and the P-value and/or critical value, and state the conclusion.


Flat Tire and Missed Class A classic story involves four carpooling students who missed a test and gave as an excuse a flat tire. On the makeup test, the instructor asked the students to identify the particular tire that went flat. If they really didn’t have a flat tire, would they be able to identify the same tire? The author asked 41 other students to identify the tire they would select. The results are listed in the following table (except for one student who selected the spare). Use a 0.05 significance level to test the author’s claim that the results fit a uniform distribution. What does the result suggest about the likelihood of four students identifying the same tire when they really didn’t have a flat?


<IMAGE>

Verified step by step guidance
1
Step 1: Define the null and alternative hypotheses. The null hypothesis (H₀) states that the tire selections follow a uniform distribution, meaning each tire is equally likely to be selected. The alternative hypothesis (H₁) states that the tire selections do not follow a uniform distribution.
Step 2: Calculate the expected frequency for each tire under the assumption of a uniform distribution. Since there are 41 students and 4 tires, the expected frequency for each tire is calculated as: 414.
Step 3: Use the observed frequencies from the table (11 for Left Front, 15 for Right Front, 8 for Left Rear, and 6 for Right Rear) and the expected frequencies to compute the test statistic. The test statistic for a chi-square goodness-of-fit test is calculated using the formula: (O-E)2E, where O represents the observed frequency and E represents the expected frequency.
Step 4: Determine the degrees of freedom for the chi-square test. The degrees of freedom are calculated as: df=k-1, where k is the number of categories (in this case, 4 tires).
Step 5: Compare the calculated test statistic to the critical value from the chi-square distribution table at a significance level of 0.05, or use the P-value approach. If the test statistic exceeds the critical value or if the P-value is less than 0.05, reject the null hypothesis. Otherwise, fail to reject the null hypothesis. Interpret the result in the context of the problem to determine the likelihood of four students identifying the same tire when they really didn’t have a flat.

Verified video answer for a similar problem:

This video solution was recommended by our tutors as helpful for the problem above.
Video duration:
4m
Was this helpful?

Key Concepts

Here are the essential concepts you must grasp in order to answer the question correctly.

Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis testing is a statistical method used to make decisions about a population based on sample data. It involves formulating a null hypothesis (H0) that represents no effect or no difference, and an alternative hypothesis (H1) that indicates the presence of an effect. The test assesses the evidence against H0 using a test statistic and a significance level, leading to a conclusion about whether to reject or fail to reject H0.
Recommended video:
Guided course
06:21
Step 1: Write Hypotheses

Uniform Distribution

A uniform distribution is a type of probability distribution where all outcomes are equally likely. In the context of this question, testing for a uniform distribution means evaluating whether the selection of tires by the students is evenly distributed across the available options. If the results significantly deviate from what would be expected under a uniform distribution, it suggests that the selections are not random and may indicate a bias or pattern.
Recommended video:
Guided course
06:38
Intro to Frequency Distributions

P-value

The P-value is a measure that helps determine the strength of the evidence against the null hypothesis in hypothesis testing. It represents the probability of observing the test results, or something more extreme, assuming that the null hypothesis is true. A smaller P-value indicates stronger evidence against H0, and if it is less than the predetermined significance level (e.g., 0.05), the null hypothesis is rejected, suggesting that the observed data is unlikely under the null hypothesis.
Recommended video:
Guided course
06:50
Step 3: Get P-Value
Related Practice
Textbook Question

Benford’s Law

According to Benford’s law, a variety of different data sets include numbers with leading (first) digits that follow the distribution shown in the table below. In Exercises 21–24, test for goodness-of-fit with the distribution described by Benford’s law.



Detecting Fraud When working for the Brooklyn district attorney, investigator Robert Burton analyzed the leading digits of the amounts from 784 checks issued by seven suspect companies. The frequencies were found to be 0, 15, 0, 76, 479, 183, 8, 23, and 0, and those digits correspond to the leading digits of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9, respectively. If the observed frequencies are substantially different from the frequencies expected with Benford’s law, the check amounts appear to result from fraud. Use a 0.01 significance level to test for goodness-of-fit with Benford’s law. Does it appear that the checks are the result of fraud?

216
views
Textbook Question

Equivalent Tests A x^2 test involving a 2 x 2 table is equivalent to the test for the difference between two proportions, as described in Section 9-1. Using Table 11-1 from the Chapter Problem, verify that the x^2 test statistic and the z test statistic (found from the test of equality of two proportions) are related as follows: z^2 = x^2 Also show that the critical values have that same relationship.

157
views
Textbook Question

Clinical Trial of Echinacea In a clinical trial of the effectiveness of echinacea for preventing colds, the results in the table below were obtained (based on data from “An Evaluation of Echinacea Angustifolia in Experimental Rhinovirus Infections,” by Turner et al., New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 353, No. 4). Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that getting a cold is independent of the treatment group. What do the results suggest about the effectiveness of echinacea as a prevention against colds?

162
views
Textbook Question

Accuracy of Fingerprint Identifications An experiment was conducted to compare the accuracy of fingerprint experts to the accuracy of novices (based on data from “Identifying Fingerprint Expertise,” by Tangen, Thompson, and McCarthy, Psychological Science, Vol. 22, No. 8). The data in the table are based on trials in which the evaluators were given matching fingerprints. Use a 0.05 significance level to determine whether correct identification is independent of whether the evaluator is an expert or a novice.


105
views
Textbook Question

Gender and Eye Color The following table describes the distribution of eye colors reported by male and female statistics students (based on data from “Does Eye Color Depend on Gender? It Might Depend on Who or How You Ask,” by Froelich and Stephenson, Journal of Statistics Education, Vol. 21, No. 2). Is there sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the belief that gender and eye color are independent traits? Use a 0.01 significance level.


151
views
Textbook Question

Ghosts The following table summarizes results from a Pew Research Center survey in which subjects were asked whether they had seen or been in the presence of a ghost. Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that gender is independent of response. Does the conclusion change if the significance level is changed to 0.05?


111
views