In this video, we're going to go into a little bit more depth on the major products of ortho para directed reactions. In general, whenever we have an EAS reaction on an ortho para director, we're just going to say that the product is a mixture of both the ortho and the para positions. If you want to play it safe, you can always just say that it's a mixture. And that's the way that most textbooks teach it. However, there are a few patterns that might be helpful for us to learn, especially later on when we start talking about specific groups called blocking groups. Let me tell you about the difference between the ortho position and the para position. Well, basically these positions are in competition with each other because they both have advantages. Let's say they have an electron donating group. That means it's pushing electrons into the ring and it's probably an ortho para director, right? Well, the ortho position has an advantage, a clear advantage right from the beginning because notice that it has two positions instead of one. The para position, there's only one para. But there are two ortho positions. So you might think, well we're going to get more ortho product because you have twice as many positions that could react. Okay? So that's one way to think about it. There are two times as many positions. But on the other hand, the para position also has an advantage which is that the para position is usually the one that's less hindered because it's furthest away from the donating group. So it's actually easier to add to that para position even though there's less of them. And in general, when you kind of pair these two together, when you compete them against each other in number versus steric hindrance, steric hindrance is usually going to win. So usually there's going to be a slight advantage for the para position over the ortho position. So if in a question you're asked to supply one major product instead of a mixture, if it says specifically which one is the major product, here we can see a sulfonation on toluene. You can see we've got our SO₃. We've got our fuming H₂SO₄ and look what we're going to get. What we are going to get is a major product of para. You would say that your para sulfonic acid is going to be the major product and your ortho is going to be the minor. Even though there are more ortho positions, the steric hindrance, the benefit of sterics is going to make the para the major product. Basically, that's going to be the rule that we always follow. We're going to say that para wins out over ortho if asked to supply one major product. Now there is one noted exception and that one exception is if the final product can hydrogen bond with itself. If the final product can hydrogen bond because of the orientation of the groups, then we would say that the ortho will slightly win. Here you guys can see the nitration of phenyl. Notice that here I have my nitric acid. I have my sulfuric acid. We know that we're going to generate what is it? It's going to be the Nitronium cation or nitronium ion. We know that OH is an ortho para director because it has a lone pair. That means that it's an electron donating. I mean it has two lone pairs. I'm just saying it has at least one lone pair. We know that it's going to direct either next to it, which is ortho, or at the bottom, which is para. But it turns out that in this case, ortho is slightly better. Why? Because if you make it ortho, then you can get a hydrogen bond between the phenyl and the nitrile group. If you make it para, it's less hindered. It's easier to add in that way but it can't interact with itself. It's not going to be quite as favored. This ratio actually isn't as big of a difference as you might think. It's actually only going to be a 60% to 35 percent ratio. Meaning that it's not even winning by that much but still this would be the only exception where we would expect more ortho. But for everything else, if asked to supply one major product, I mean you can always say it's a mixture. But if you're asked to supply one, you're usually going to go with the para product because it's the one that's less sterically hindered. All right, guys, so believe me, you don't need to know these percentages. I'm just giving them as a teaching moment so you guys can see actual examples in real life and you guys can understand how it plays out. But in general, you can just go with the rules that I'm telling you. All right, guys. Let's move on to the next video.
- 1. A Review of General Chemistry5h 5m
- Summary23m
- Intro to Organic Chemistry5m
- Atomic Structure16m
- Wave Function9m
- Molecular Orbitals17m
- Sigma and Pi Bonds9m
- Octet Rule12m
- Bonding Preferences12m
- Formal Charges6m
- Skeletal Structure14m
- Lewis Structure20m
- Condensed Structural Formula15m
- Degrees of Unsaturation15m
- Constitutional Isomers14m
- Resonance Structures46m
- Hybridization23m
- Molecular Geometry16m
- Electronegativity22m
- 2. Molecular Representations1h 14m
- 3. Acids and Bases2h 46m
- 4. Alkanes and Cycloalkanes4h 19m
- IUPAC Naming29m
- Alkyl Groups13m
- Naming Cycloalkanes10m
- Naming Bicyclic Compounds10m
- Naming Alkyl Halides7m
- Naming Alkenes3m
- Naming Alcohols8m
- Naming Amines15m
- Cis vs Trans21m
- Conformational Isomers13m
- Newman Projections14m
- Drawing Newman Projections16m
- Barrier To Rotation7m
- Ring Strain8m
- Axial vs Equatorial7m
- Cis vs Trans Conformations4m
- Equatorial Preference14m
- Chair Flip9m
- Calculating Energy Difference Between Chair Conformations17m
- A-Values17m
- Decalin7m
- 5. Chirality3h 39m
- Constitutional Isomers vs. Stereoisomers9m
- Chirality12m
- Test 1:Plane of Symmetry7m
- Test 2:Stereocenter Test17m
- R and S Configuration43m
- Enantiomers vs. Diastereomers13m
- Atropisomers9m
- Meso Compound12m
- Test 3:Disubstituted Cycloalkanes13m
- What is the Relationship Between Isomers?16m
- Fischer Projection10m
- R and S of Fischer Projections7m
- Optical Activity5m
- Enantiomeric Excess20m
- Calculations with Enantiomeric Percentages11m
- Non-Carbon Chiral Centers8m
- 6. Thermodynamics and Kinetics1h 22m
- 7. Substitution Reactions1h 48m
- 8. Elimination Reactions2h 30m
- 9. Alkenes and Alkynes2h 9m
- 10. Addition Reactions3h 18m
- Addition Reaction6m
- Markovnikov5m
- Hydrohalogenation6m
- Acid-Catalyzed Hydration17m
- Oxymercuration15m
- Hydroboration26m
- Hydrogenation6m
- Halogenation6m
- Halohydrin12m
- Carbene12m
- Epoxidation8m
- Epoxide Reactions9m
- Dihydroxylation8m
- Ozonolysis7m
- Ozonolysis Full Mechanism24m
- Oxidative Cleavage3m
- Alkyne Oxidative Cleavage6m
- Alkyne Hydrohalogenation3m
- Alkyne Halogenation2m
- Alkyne Hydration6m
- Alkyne Hydroboration2m
- 11. Radical Reactions1h 58m
- 12. Alcohols, Ethers, Epoxides and Thiols2h 42m
- Alcohol Nomenclature4m
- Naming Ethers6m
- Naming Epoxides18m
- Naming Thiols11m
- Alcohol Synthesis7m
- Leaving Group Conversions - Using HX11m
- Leaving Group Conversions - SOCl2 and PBr313m
- Leaving Group Conversions - Sulfonyl Chlorides7m
- Leaving Group Conversions Summary4m
- Williamson Ether Synthesis3m
- Making Ethers - Alkoxymercuration4m
- Making Ethers - Alcohol Condensation4m
- Making Ethers - Acid-Catalyzed Alkoxylation4m
- Making Ethers - Cumulative Practice10m
- Ether Cleavage8m
- Alcohol Protecting Groups3m
- t-Butyl Ether Protecting Groups5m
- Silyl Ether Protecting Groups10m
- Sharpless Epoxidation9m
- Thiol Reactions6m
- Sulfide Oxidation4m
- 13. Alcohols and Carbonyl Compounds2h 17m
- 14. Synthetic Techniques1h 26m
- 15. Analytical Techniques:IR, NMR, Mass Spect6h 50m
- Purpose of Analytical Techniques5m
- Infrared Spectroscopy16m
- Infrared Spectroscopy Table31m
- IR Spect:Drawing Spectra40m
- IR Spect:Extra Practice26m
- NMR Spectroscopy10m
- 1H NMR:Number of Signals26m
- 1H NMR:Q-Test26m
- 1H NMR:E/Z Diastereoisomerism8m
- H NMR Table21m
- 1H NMR:Spin-Splitting (N + 1) Rule17m
- 1H NMR:Spin-Splitting Simple Tree Diagrams11m
- 1H NMR:Spin-Splitting Complex Tree Diagrams8m
- 1H NMR:Spin-Splitting Patterns8m
- NMR Integration18m
- NMR Practice14m
- Carbon NMR4m
- Structure Determination without Mass Spect47m
- Mass Spectrometry12m
- Mass Spect:Fragmentation28m
- Mass Spect:Isotopes27m
- 16. Conjugated Systems6h 13m
- Conjugation Chemistry13m
- Stability of Conjugated Intermediates4m
- Allylic Halogenation12m
- Reactions at the Allylic Position39m
- Conjugated Hydrohalogenation (1,2 vs 1,4 addition)26m
- Diels-Alder Reaction9m
- Diels-Alder Forming Bridged Products11m
- Diels-Alder Retrosynthesis8m
- Molecular Orbital Theory9m
- Drawing Atomic Orbitals6m
- Drawing Molecular Orbitals17m
- HOMO LUMO4m
- Orbital Diagram:3-atoms- Allylic Ions13m
- Orbital Diagram:4-atoms- 1,3-butadiene11m
- Orbital Diagram:5-atoms- Allylic Ions10m
- Orbital Diagram:6-atoms- 1,3,5-hexatriene13m
- Orbital Diagram:Excited States4m
- Pericyclic Reaction10m
- Thermal Cycloaddition Reactions26m
- Photochemical Cycloaddition Reactions26m
- Thermal Electrocyclic Reactions14m
- Photochemical Electrocyclic Reactions10m
- Cumulative Electrocyclic Problems25m
- Sigmatropic Rearrangement17m
- Cope Rearrangement9m
- Claisen Rearrangement15m
- 17. Ultraviolet Spectroscopy51m
- 18. Aromaticity2h 31m
- 19. Reactions of Aromatics: EAS and Beyond5h 1m
- Electrophilic Aromatic Substitution9m
- Benzene Reactions11m
- EAS:Halogenation Mechanism6m
- EAS:Nitration Mechanism9m
- EAS:Friedel-Crafts Alkylation Mechanism6m
- EAS:Friedel-Crafts Acylation Mechanism5m
- EAS:Any Carbocation Mechanism7m
- Electron Withdrawing Groups22m
- EAS:Ortho vs. Para Positions4m
- Acylation of Aniline9m
- Limitations of Friedel-Crafts Alkyation19m
- Advantages of Friedel-Crafts Acylation6m
- Blocking Groups - Sulfonic Acid12m
- EAS:Synergistic and Competitive Groups13m
- Side-Chain Halogenation6m
- Side-Chain Oxidation4m
- Reactions at Benzylic Positions31m
- Birch Reduction10m
- EAS:Sequence Groups4m
- EAS:Retrosynthesis29m
- Diazo Replacement Reactions6m
- Diazo Sequence Groups5m
- Diazo Retrosynthesis13m
- Nucleophilic Aromatic Substitution28m
- Benzyne16m
- 20. Phenols55m
- 21. Aldehydes and Ketones: Nucleophilic Addition4h 56m
- Naming Aldehydes8m
- Naming Ketones7m
- Oxidizing and Reducing Agents9m
- Oxidation of Alcohols28m
- Ozonolysis7m
- DIBAL5m
- Alkyne Hydration9m
- Nucleophilic Addition8m
- Cyanohydrin11m
- Organometallics on Ketones19m
- Overview of Nucleophilic Addition of Solvents13m
- Hydrates6m
- Hemiacetal9m
- Acetal12m
- Acetal Protecting Group16m
- Thioacetal6m
- Imine vs Enamine15m
- Addition of Amine Derivatives5m
- Wolff Kishner Reduction7m
- Baeyer-Villiger Oxidation39m
- Acid Chloride to Ketone7m
- Nitrile to Ketone9m
- Wittig Reaction18m
- Ketone and Aldehyde Synthesis Reactions14m
- 22. Carboxylic Acid Derivatives: NAS2h 51m
- Carboxylic Acid Derivatives7m
- Naming Carboxylic Acids9m
- Diacid Nomenclature6m
- Naming Esters5m
- Naming Nitriles3m
- Acid Chloride Nomenclature5m
- Naming Anhydrides7m
- Naming Amides5m
- Nucleophilic Acyl Substitution18m
- Carboxylic Acid to Acid Chloride6m
- Fischer Esterification5m
- Acid-Catalyzed Ester Hydrolysis4m
- Saponification3m
- Transesterification5m
- Lactones, Lactams and Cyclization Reactions10m
- Carboxylation5m
- Decarboxylation Mechanism14m
- Review of Nitriles46m
- 23. The Chemistry of Thioesters, Phophate Ester and Phosphate Anhydrides1h 10m
- 24. Enolate Chemistry: Reactions at the Alpha-Carbon1h 53m
- Tautomerization9m
- Tautomers of Dicarbonyl Compounds6m
- Enolate4m
- Acid-Catalyzed Alpha-Halogentation4m
- Base-Catalyzed Alpha-Halogentation3m
- Haloform Reaction8m
- Hell-Volhard-Zelinski Reaction3m
- Overview of Alpha-Alkylations and Acylations5m
- Enolate Alkylation and Acylation12m
- Enamine Alkylation and Acylation16m
- Beta-Dicarbonyl Synthesis Pathway7m
- Acetoacetic Ester Synthesis13m
- Malonic Ester Synthesis15m
- 25. Condensation Chemistry2h 9m
- 26. Amines1h 43m
- 27. Heterocycles2h 0m
- Nomenclature of Heterocycles15m
- Acid-Base Properties of Nitrogen Heterocycles10m
- Reactions of Pyrrole, Furan, and Thiophene13m
- Directing Effects in Substituted Pyrroles, Furans, and Thiophenes16m
- Addition Reactions of Furan8m
- EAS Reactions of Pyridine17m
- SNAr Reactions of Pyridine18m
- Side-Chain Reactions of Substituted Pyridines20m
- 28. Carbohydrates5h 53m
- Monosaccharide20m
- Monosaccharides - D and L Isomerism9m
- Monosaccharides - Drawing Fischer Projections18m
- Monosaccharides - Common Structures6m
- Monosaccharides - Forming Cyclic Hemiacetals12m
- Monosaccharides - Cyclization18m
- Monosaccharides - Haworth Projections13m
- Mutarotation11m
- Epimerization9m
- Monosaccharides - Aldose-Ketose Rearrangement8m
- Monosaccharides - Alkylation10m
- Monosaccharides - Acylation7m
- Glycoside6m
- Monosaccharides - N-Glycosides18m
- Monosaccharides - Reduction (Alditols)12m
- Monosaccharides - Weak Oxidation (Aldonic Acid)7m
- Reducing Sugars23m
- Monosaccharides - Strong Oxidation (Aldaric Acid)11m
- Monosaccharides - Oxidative Cleavage27m
- Monosaccharides - Osazones10m
- Monosaccharides - Kiliani-Fischer23m
- Monosaccharides - Wohl Degradation12m
- Monosaccharides - Ruff Degradation12m
- Disaccharide30m
- Polysaccharide11m
- 29. Amino Acids3h 20m
- Proteins and Amino Acids19m
- L and D Amino Acids14m
- Polar Amino Acids14m
- Amino Acid Chart18m
- Acid-Base Properties of Amino Acids33m
- Isoelectric Point14m
- Amino Acid Synthesis: HVZ Method12m
- Synthesis of Amino Acids: Acetamidomalonic Ester Synthesis16m
- Synthesis of Amino Acids: N-Phthalimidomalonic Ester Synthesis13m
- Synthesis of Amino Acids: Strecker Synthesis13m
- Reactions of Amino Acids: Esterification7m
- Reactions of Amino Acids: Acylation3m
- Reactions of Amino Acids: Hydrogenolysis6m
- Reactions of Amino Acids: Nihydrin Test11m
- 32. Lipids 2h 50m
- 34. Nucleic Acids1h 32m
- 35. Transition Metals5h 33m
- Electron Configuration of Elements45m
- Coordination Complexes20m
- Ligands24m
- Electron Counting10m
- The 18 and 16 Electron Rule13m
- Cross-Coupling General Reactions40m
- Heck Reaction40m
- Stille Reaction13m
- Suzuki Reaction25m
- Sonogashira Coupling Reaction17m
- Fukuyama Coupling Reaction15m
- Kumada Coupling Reaction13m
- Negishi Coupling Reaction16m
- Buchwald-Hartwig Amination Reaction19m
- Eglinton Reaction17m
EAS:Ortho vs. Para Positions - Online Tutor, Practice Problems & Exam Prep
In electrophilic aromatic substitution (EAS) reactions, ortho and para positions are favored by electron-donating groups. While ortho positions have two reactive sites, para positions are less hindered, often making them the major product. An exception occurs when hydrogen bonding favors the ortho product, as seen in nitration reactions. Generally, for a single major product, the para product prevails due to steric hindrance, except when self-hydrogen bonding occurs, leading to a slight preference for ortho products.
In general, we refer to the products of an EAS o,p-director as a mixture – but there are some patterns we can learn.
Ortho, Para major products
Video transcript
There is one exception to this rule – which occurs if the final product can hydrogen-bond with itself. Then, we would expect more ortho, than para product.
Do you want more practice?
More setsHere’s what students ask on this topic:
What is the difference between ortho and para positions in EAS reactions?
In electrophilic aromatic substitution (EAS) reactions, ortho and para positions refer to the locations on the benzene ring where substituents can attach. The ortho positions are adjacent to the substituent (positions 2 and 6), while the para position is directly opposite the substituent (position 4). Ortho positions have two reactive sites, making them statistically more likely to react. However, the para position is less sterically hindered, often making it the major product. The choice between ortho and para products depends on factors like steric hindrance and potential hydrogen bonding.
Why is the para product usually favored over the ortho product in EAS reactions?
The para product is usually favored over the ortho product in EAS reactions due to steric hindrance. The para position is further away from the electron-donating group, making it less crowded and easier for the electrophile to attack. Although there are two ortho positions compared to one para position, the reduced steric hindrance at the para position generally makes it the major product. An exception occurs when hydrogen bonding can stabilize the ortho product, as seen in some nitration reactions.
What is the role of steric hindrance in determining the major product in EAS reactions?
Steric hindrance plays a crucial role in determining the major product in EAS reactions. Steric hindrance refers to the physical crowding around a reactive site, which can impede the approach of an electrophile. In the context of ortho and para positions, the para position is less sterically hindered because it is further away from the electron-donating group. This makes it easier for the electrophile to attack the para position, often resulting in the para product being the major product. However, if hydrogen bonding can occur, the ortho product may be favored.
Can hydrogen bonding influence the preference for ortho products in EAS reactions?
Yes, hydrogen bonding can influence the preference for ortho products in EAS reactions. When the final product can form hydrogen bonds with itself, the ortho product may be favored. This is because hydrogen bonding can provide additional stability to the ortho product. For example, in the nitration of phenol, the ortho product is slightly favored over the para product due to the ability to form a hydrogen bond between the hydroxyl group and the nitro group. However, this is an exception, and generally, the para product is favored due to reduced steric hindrance.
What are blocking groups and how do they affect ortho and para positions in EAS reactions?
Blocking groups are substituents that are intentionally added to a benzene ring to control the position of subsequent substitutions in EAS reactions. They can either block or direct electrophiles to specific positions on the ring. For example, a bulky blocking group can be placed at the ortho position to prevent further substitution there, thereby directing the electrophile to the para position. Blocking groups are useful in synthetic chemistry for achieving selective substitution patterns on aromatic rings.